Suppr超能文献

卷积专家混合模型:视网膜光学相干断层扫描成像中自动黄斑诊断的比较研究

Convolutional Mixture of Experts Model: A Comparative Study on Automatic Macular Diagnosis in Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging.

作者信息

Rasti Reza, Mehridehnavi Alireza, Rabbani Hossein, Hajizadeh Fedra

机构信息

Department of Bioelectric and Biomedical Engineering, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

J Med Signals Sens. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):1-14. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_27_17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Macular disorders, such as diabetic macular edema (DME) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) are among the major ocular diseases. Having one of these diseases can lead to vision impairments or even permanent blindness in a not-so-long time span. So, the early diagnosis of these diseases are the main goals for researchers in the field.

METHODS

This study is designed in order to present a comparative analysis on the recent convolutional mixture of experts (CMoE) models for distinguishing normal macular OCT from DME and AMD. For this purpose, we considered three recent CMoE models called Mixture ensemble of convolutional neural networks (ME-CNN), Multi-scale Convolutional Mixture of Experts (MCME), and Wavelet-based Convolutional Mixture of Experts (WCME) models. For this research study, the models were evaluated on a database of three different macular OCT sets. Two first OCT sets were acquired by Heidelberg imaging systems consisting of 148 and 45 subjects respectively and set3 was constituted of 384 Bioptigen OCT acquisitions. To provide better performance insight into the CMoE ensembles, we extensively analyzed the models based on the 5-fold cross-validation method and various classification measures such as precision and average area under the ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Experimental evaluations showed that the MCME and WCME outperformed the ME-CNN model and presented overall precisions of 98.14% and 96.06% for aligned OCTs respectively. For non-aligned retinal OCTs, these values were 93.95% and 95.56%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the comparative analysis, although the MCME model outperformed the other CMoE models in the analysis of aligned retinal OCTs, the WCME offers a robust model for diagnosis of non-aligned retinal OCTs. This allows having a fast and robust computer-aided system in macular OCT imaging which does not rely on the routine computerized processes such as denoising, segmentation of retinal layers, and also retinal layers alignment.

摘要

背景

黄斑疾病,如糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)和年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是主要的眼部疾病。患有一种此类疾病可能在不长的时间内导致视力受损甚至永久性失明。因此,这些疾病的早期诊断是该领域研究人员的主要目标。

方法

本研究旨在对用于区分正常黄斑光学相干断层扫描(OCT)与DME和AMD的近期卷积专家混合(CMoE)模型进行比较分析。为此,我们考虑了三种近期的CMoE模型,即卷积神经网络混合集成(ME-CNN)、多尺度卷积专家混合(MCME)和基于小波的卷积专家混合(WCME)模型。对于本研究,在三个不同的黄斑OCT数据集上对模型进行评估。前两个OCT数据集由海德堡成像系统采集,分别包含148名和45名受试者,数据集3由384次Bioptigen OCT采集组成。为了更好地了解CMoE集成的性能,我们基于5折交叉验证方法和各种分类指标(如精度和ROC曲线下的平均面积(AUC))对模型进行了广泛分析。

结果

实验评估表明,MCME和WCME的表现优于ME-CNN模型,对齐的OCT的总体精度分别为98.14%和96.06%。对于未对齐的视网膜OCT,这些值分别为93.95%和95.56%。

结论

基于比较分析,尽管MCME模型在对齐的视网膜OCT分析中表现优于其他CMoE模型,但WCME为未对齐的视网膜OCT诊断提供了一个强大的模型。这使得在黄斑OCT成像中能够拥有一个快速且强大的计算机辅助系统,该系统不依赖于诸如去噪、视网膜层分割以及视网膜层对齐等常规计算机处理过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b86/6419560/8555335648de/JMSS-9-1-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验