Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;40(1):81-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683896. Epub 2019 May 6.
Mechanical ventilation practices in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have progressed with a growing understanding of the disease pathophysiology. Paramount to the care of affected patients is the delivery of lung-protective mechanical ventilation which prioritizes tidal volume and plateau pressure limitation. Lung protection can probably be further enhanced by scaling target tidal volumes to the specific respiratory mechanics of individual patients. The best procedure for selecting optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS remains uncertain; several relevant issues must be considered when selecting PEEP, particularly lung recruitability. Noninvasive ventilation must be used with caution in ARDS as excessively high respiratory drive can further exacerbate lung injury; newer modes of delivery offer promising approaches in hypoxemic respiratory failure. Airway pressure release ventilation offers an alternative approach to maximize lung recruitment and oxygenation, but clinical trials have not demonstrated a survival benefit of this mode over conventional ventilation strategies. Rescue therapy with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation is an important option in refractory hypoxemia. Despite a disappointing lack of benefit (and possible harm) in patients with moderate or severe ARDS, possibly due to lung hyperdistention and right ventricular dysfunction, high-frequency oscillation may improve outcome in patients with very severe hypoxemia.
机械通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者中的应用随着对疾病病理生理学认识的不断深入而不断发展。对受影响患者的护理至关重要的是提供肺保护性机械通气,这优先考虑潮气量和平台压限制。通过将目标潮气量与个体患者的特定呼吸力学相匹配,肺保护可能会进一步增强。在 ARDS 中选择最佳呼气末正压(PEEP)的最佳方法仍然不确定;在选择 PEEP 时,必须考虑几个相关问题,特别是肺可复张性。ARDS 中必须谨慎使用无创通气,因为过高的呼吸驱动可能会进一步加重肺损伤;新型输送模式为低氧性呼吸衰竭提供了有前途的方法。气道压力释放通气提供了一种替代方法,可最大限度地提高肺复张和氧合,但临床试验并未证明这种模式比传统通气策略具有生存优势。高频振荡通气的抢救治疗是难治性低氧血症的重要选择。尽管在中度或重度 ARDS 患者中高频振荡通气没有带来益处(甚至可能有害),可能是由于肺过度膨胀和右心室功能障碍,但高频振荡通气可能会改善非常严重低氧血症患者的预后。