Stefaniak A B, Johnson A R, du Preez S, Hammond D R, Wells J R, Ham J E, LeBouf R F, Martin S B, Duling M G, Bowers L N, Knepp A K, de Beer D J, du Plessis J L
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
North-West University, Occupational Hygiene and Health Research Initiative, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa.
Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Emerging reports suggest the potential for adverse health effects from exposure to emissions from some additive manufacturing (AM) processes. There is a paucity of real-world data on emissions from AM machines in industrial workplaces and personal exposures among AM operators.
Airborne particle and organic chemical emissions and personal exposures were characterized using real-time and time-integrated sampling techniques in four manufacturing facilities using industrial-scale material extrusion and material jetting AM processes.
Using a condensation nuclei counter, number-based particle emission rates (ERs) (number/min) from material extrusion AM machines ranged from 4.1 × 10 (Ultem filament) to 2.2 × 10 [acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polycarbonate filaments). For these same machines, total volatile organic compound ERs (μg/min) ranged from 1.9 × 10 (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polycarbonate) to 9.4 × 10 (Ultem). For the material jetting machines, the number-based particle ER was higher when the lid was open (2.3 × 10 number/min) than when the lid was closed (1.5-5.5 × 10 number/min); total volatile organic compound ERs were similar regardless of the lid position. Low levels of acetone, benzene, toluene, and -xylene were common to both AM processes. Carbonyl compounds were detected; however, none were specifically attributed to the AM processes. Personal exposures to metals (aluminum and iron) and eight volatile organic compounds were all below National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-recommended exposure levels.
Industrial-scale AM machines using thermoplastics and resins released particles and organic vapors into workplace air. More research is needed to understand factors influencing real-world industrial-scale AM process emissions and exposures.
新出现的报告表明,接触某些增材制造(AM)工艺排放物可能对健康产生不良影响。关于工业工作场所增材制造机器的排放以及增材制造操作人员的个人暴露情况,实际数据匮乏。
在四个使用工业规模材料挤出和材料喷射增材制造工艺的制造设施中,采用实时和时间积分采样技术对空气中的颗粒物和有机化学物质排放以及个人暴露情况进行了表征。
使用凝结核计数器,材料挤出增材制造机器基于数量的颗粒物排放率(ERs)(个/分钟)范围为4.1×10(聚醚酰亚胺长丝)至2.2×10[丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯和聚碳酸酯长丝]。对于这些相同的机器,总挥发性有机化合物ERs(微克/分钟)范围为从(丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯和聚碳酸酯)的1.9×10至(聚醚酰亚胺)的9.4×10。对于材料喷射机器,盖子打开时基于数量的颗粒物ER更高(2.3×10个/分钟),而盖子关闭时为(1.5 - 5.5×10个/分钟);无论盖子位置如何,总挥发性有机化合物ERs相似。两种增材制造工艺中均常见低水平的丙酮、苯、甲苯和二甲苯。检测到了羰基化合物;然而,没有一种被明确归因于增材制造工艺。个人对金属(铝和铁)和八种挥发性有机化合物的暴露均低于美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)推荐的暴露水平。
使用热塑性塑料和树脂的工业规模增材制造机器向工作场所空气中释放颗粒物和有机蒸气。需要更多研究来了解影响实际工业规模增材制造工艺排放和暴露的因素。