• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Moving from risk communication to food information communication and consumer engagement.从风险沟通转向食品信息传播与消费者参与。
NPJ Sci Food. 2018 Nov 30;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41538-018-0031-7. eCollection 2018.
2
Consumers' Food Safety Risk Communication on Social Media Following the Suan Tang Zi Accident: An Extended Protection Motivation Theory Perspective.社交媒体中“苏丹红事件”后的消费者食品安全风险沟通:扩展保护动机理论视角
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158080.
3
Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.食品掺假与欧洲输华食品的可信度感知
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195817. eCollection 2018.
4
Consumers' Awareness and Trust Toward Food Safety News on Social Media in Malaysia.马来西亚消费者对社交媒体食品安全新闻的认知和信任。
J Food Prot. 2020 Mar 1;83(3):452-459. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-415.
5
How Do Consumers' Food Values across Countries Lead to Changes in the Strategy of Food Supply-Chain Management?不同国家消费者的食品价值观如何导致食品供应链管理策略的变化?
Foods. 2021 Jul 1;10(7):1523. doi: 10.3390/foods10071523.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Determinants of the willingness to buy products certified by omics technology: differences between regular and occasional consumers of organic food.消费者购买基于组学技术认证产品意愿的决定因素:常规消费者和偶然消费者对有机食品的差异。
Food Res Int. 2023 Feb;164:112324. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112324. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
8
Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: The role of perceived consumer effectiveness.消费者的环境和道德意识以及对相关食品产品信息的使用:感知消费者效能的作用。
Appetite. 2016 Dec 1;107:311-322. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.097. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
9
Development of strategies for effective communication of food risks and benefits across Europe: design and conceptual framework of the FoodRisC project.制定在整个欧洲有效沟通食品风险和益处的策略:FoodRisC 项目的设计和概念框架。
BMC Public Health. 2011 May 13;11:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-308.
10
Food Safety Trust, Risk Perception, and Consumers' Response to Company Trust Repair Actions in Food Recall Crises.食品安全信托、风险感知与消费者对食品召回危机中公司信任修复行为的反应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1270. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041270.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive and preference disparities of Chinese consumers regarding the disclosure of unsafe food recall information.中国消费者在不安全食品召回信息披露方面的认知与偏好差异
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 9;12:1467518. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467518. eCollection 2024.
2
Updated review on contaminant communication experiences in the circumpolar Arctic.北极圈污染物沟通经验的最新综述。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024 Dec;83(1):2371623. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2371623. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
3
Food Risk Analysis: Towards a Better Understanding of "Hazard" and "Risk" in EU Food Legislation.食品风险分析:深入理解欧盟食品立法中的“危害”与“风险”
Foods. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):2857. doi: 10.3390/foods12152857.
4
Theoretical and practical aspects of risk communication in food safety: A review study.食品安全风险沟通的理论与实践层面:一项综述研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 11;9(7):e18141. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18141. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
How Perspectives on Food Safety of Vendors and Consumers Translate into Food-Choice Behaviors in 6 African and Asian Countries.在6个非洲和亚洲国家,摊贩与消费者对食品安全的看法如何转化为食物选择行为。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;7(1):100015. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2022.100015. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Integrating science to address food and health within Global Agenda 2030.结合科学以在《2030年全球议程》中解决粮食与健康问题。
NPJ Sci Food. 2021 Apr 7;5(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s41538-021-00088-1.
7
Behavioral Ethics and the Incidence of Foodborne Illness Outbreaks.行为伦理学与食源性疾病暴发的发生率
J Agric Environ Ethics. 2020;33(3-6):531-548. doi: 10.1007/s10806-020-09837-w. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
8
#Healthy: smart digital food safety and nutrition communication strategies-a critical commentary.#健康:智能数字食品安全与营养传播策略——一篇批判性评论。
NPJ Sci Food. 2020 Oct 1;4:14. doi: 10.1038/s41538-020-00074-z. eCollection 2020.
9
What makes smartphone games successful in food information communication?是什么让智能手机游戏在食品信息传播方面取得成功?
NPJ Sci Food. 2020 Jan 30;4:2. doi: 10.1038/s41538-020-0062-8. eCollection 2020.
10
Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial opportunities in the food value chain.食品价值链中的创业与创业机会。
NPJ Sci Food. 2019 Apr 16;3:6. doi: 10.1038/s41538-019-0039-7. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Four years post-horsegate: an update of measures and actions put in place following the horsemeat incident of 2013.马肉丑闻四年后:2013年马肉事件后所采取措施及行动的最新情况
NPJ Sci Food. 2017 Nov 6;1:5. doi: 10.1038/s41538-017-0007-z. eCollection 2017.
2
The Effects of Digital Marketing of Unhealthy Commodities on Young People: A Systematic Review.《不健康商品的数字营销对年轻人的影响:系统评价》。
Nutrients. 2018 Jan 29;10(2):148. doi: 10.3390/nu10020148.
3
Medical Education in the Era of Alternative Facts.“另类事实”时代的医学教育。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):607-609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1706528.
4
A Systematic Review of the Use of Social Media for Food Safety Risk Communication.社交媒体用于食品安全风险沟通的系统评价
J Food Prot. 2017 Sep;80(9):1537-1549. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-345.
5
Reasons for measles cases not being vaccinated with MMR: investigation into parents' and carers' views following a large measles outbreak.麻疹病例未接种麻腮风疫苗的原因:在一次大规模麻疹疫情后对家长和照顾者观点的调查
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Mar;144(4):870-5. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815001909. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
6
Social media campaigns that make a difference: what can public health learn from the corporate sector and other social change marketers?产生影响的社交媒体活动:公共卫生领域能从企业部门及其他社会变革营销者身上学到什么?
Public Health Res Pract. 2015 Mar 30;25(2):e2521517. doi: 10.17061/phrp2521517.
7
Risk/Benefit Communication about Food-A Systematic Review of the Literature.食品风险/效益沟通的文献系统综述。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016 Jul 26;56(10):1728-45. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.801337.
8
Potential of social media as a tool to combat foodborne illness.社交媒体作为对抗食源性疾病工具的潜力。
Perspect Public Health. 2014 Jul;134(4):225-30. doi: 10.1177/1757913914538015.
9
Origins of the E. coli strain causing an outbreak of hemolytic-uremic syndrome in Germany.导致德国爆发溶血性尿毒综合征的大肠杆菌菌株的起源。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 25;365(8):709-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1106920. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
10
Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food: its two-dimensional structure and determinants.理解消费者对食品安全的信心:其二维结构及决定因素。
Risk Anal. 2007 Jun;27(3):729-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00917.x.

从风险沟通转向食品信息传播与消费者参与。

Moving from risk communication to food information communication and consumer engagement.

作者信息

Wall Patrick G, Chen Junshi

机构信息

1Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Chinese Centre for Food Safety and Risk Assessment, Chaoyang, China.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Food. 2018 Nov 30;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41538-018-0031-7. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1038/s41538-018-0031-7
PMID:31304271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6550139/
Abstract

Consumers in most developed countries have greater access to safer food than ever before, yet the issue of consumer perception on the safety of the food supply, the control infrastructure and existing and new process technologies is often not positive. A series of high profile food incidents, which have been ineffectively managed by both the regulators and the industry, and where there has been a failure to be open and transparent, have sensitised a proportion of consumers to scary stories about the food supply. There has been concomitant damage to consumer confidence in (i) the safety of food, (ii) the food industry's commitment to producing safe food and (iii) the authorities' ability to oversee the food chain. Threats to consumers' health and their genuine concerns have to be addressed with effective risk management and the protection of public health has to be paramount. Dealing with incorrect fears and misperceptions of risk has also to be addressed but achieving this is very difficult. The competencies of social scientists are needed to assist in gaining insights into consumer perceptions of risk, consumer behaviour and the determinants of trust. Conventional risk communication will not succeed on its own and more innovative and creative communication strategies are needed to engage with consumers using all available media channels in an open and transparent way. The digital media affords the opportunity to revolutionise engagement with consumers on food safety and nutrition-related issues.

摘要

在大多数发达国家,消费者比以往任何时候都更容易获得更安全的食品,然而,消费者对食品供应安全、控制基础设施以及现有和新的加工技术的看法往往并不乐观。一系列备受瞩目的食品事件,监管机构和行业都未能有效处理,而且缺乏公开透明,这使得一部分消费者对有关食品供应的可怕故事变得敏感起来。这同时损害了消费者对以下方面的信心:(一)食品的安全性;(二)食品行业生产安全食品的承诺;(三)当局监管食品链的能力。必须通过有效的风险管理来应对对消费者健康的威胁及其真正关切,并且保护公众健康必须是首要任务。还必须解决对风险的错误恐惧和误解,但要做到这一点非常困难。需要社会科学家的能力来帮助深入了解消费者对风险的认知、消费者行为以及信任的决定因素。传统的风险沟通单靠自身是不会成功的,需要更具创新性和创造性的沟通策略,以开放透明的方式利用所有可用的媒体渠道与消费者互动。数字媒体为彻底改变在食品安全和营养相关问题上与消费者互动提供了机会。