Suppr超能文献

深度学习在免疫组织化学中检测淋巴细胞的应用

Learning to detect lymphocytes in immunohistochemistry with deep learning.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Med Image Anal. 2019 Dec;58:101547. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101547. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

Abstract

The immune system is of critical importance in the development of cancer. The evasion of destruction by the immune system is one of the emerging hallmarks of cancer. We have built a dataset of 171,166 manually annotated CD3 and CD8 cells, which we used to train deep learning algorithms for automatic detection of lymphocytes in histopathology images to better quantify immune response. Moreover, we investigate the effectiveness of four deep learning based methods when different subcompartments of the whole-slide image are considered: normal tissue areas, areas with immune cell clusters, and areas containing artifacts. We have compared the proposed methods in breast, colon and prostate cancer tissue slides collected from nine different medical centers. Finally, we report the results of an observer study on lymphocyte quantification, which involved four pathologists from different medical centers, and compare their performance with the automatic detection. The results give insights on the applicability of the proposed methods for clinical use. U-Net obtained the highest performance with an F1-score of 0.78 and the highest agreement with manual evaluation (κ=0.72), whereas the average pathologists agreement with reference standard was κ=0.64. The test set and the automatic evaluation procedure are publicly available at lyon19.grand-challenge.org.

摘要

免疫系统对癌症的发展至关重要。免疫系统的逃避破坏是癌症的新兴特征之一。我们构建了一个包含 171166 个手动注释的 CD3 和 CD8 细胞的数据集,我们使用该数据集来训练深度学习算法,以自动检测组织病理学图像中的淋巴细胞,从而更好地量化免疫反应。此外,我们研究了四种基于深度学习的方法在考虑全幻灯片图像的不同子区域时的有效性:正常组织区域、免疫细胞簇区域和包含伪影的区域。我们比较了这些方法在来自九个不同医疗中心的乳腺癌、结肠癌和前列腺癌组织幻灯片中的效果。最后,我们报告了一项关于淋巴细胞定量的观察者研究的结果,该研究涉及来自不同医疗中心的四位病理学家,并将他们的表现与自动检测进行了比较。结果为这些方法在临床应用中的适用性提供了见解。U-Net 获得了最高的性能,F1 得分为 0.78,与手动评估的一致性最高(κ=0.72),而平均病理学家与参考标准的一致性为 κ=0.64。测试集和自动评估过程可在 lyon19.grand-challenge.org 上公开获取。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验