Suppr超能文献

超声角膜测厚仪、Scheimpflug 相机和眼前节 OCT 测量不同程度角膜水肿中心角膜厚度的重复性和可靠性。

Reproducibility and reliability of central corneal thickness determination in more and less profound corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera and anterior segment OCT.

机构信息

Dept. of Ophthalmology, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwels Str. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb;258(2):351-358. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04536-3. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of different degrees of corneal edema on the reliability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness(CCT) measurements by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), anterior segment optical coherence tomography(AS-OCT) and ultrasound pachymetry(USP).

METHODS

Forty-four patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery were included in this prospective study. All measurements were acquired by two investigators. The Pentacam and AS-OCT measurements were performed in randomized order followed by USP. Two measurements were taken by each investigator with each device. CCT was evaluated by using the apex value provided by the Pentacam, the corneal apex cut in the AS-OCT and averaging 2 cycles of 4 measurements for USP. Coefficients of variation (COV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined. To investigate the reproducibility in different degrees of corneal edema, patients were subdivided into edema more/less than 10% of CCT, ≥/< 600 μm and > 650 μm CCT.

RESULTS

No significant differences were recorded for each individual investigator and measuring device. However, overall the devices differed significantly in the < 600 μm group (ANOVA p < 0.04). The reproducibility decreased with higher degrees of corneal edema in particular for investigator 1 and USP measurements. No significant overestimation of corneal thickness by the Pentacam was recorded in higher degrees of corneal edema.

CONCLUSION

USP measurements are highly user dependent especially in higher degrees of corneal edema. Nevertheless, all methods were able to reach a high level of agreement in CCT measurement in higher degrees of corneal edema. Interestingly lower degrees of corneal edema revealed the only significant differences in-between the 3 devices.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定不同程度角膜水肿对角膜厚度(CCT)测量的可靠性和可重复性的影响,该测量由Scheimpflug 相机(Pentacam)、眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)和超声角膜测厚仪(USP)进行。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入 44 名接受眼科手术的患者。所有测量均由两名研究者进行。按照随机顺序进行 Pentacam 和 AS-OCT 测量,然后进行 USP。每位研究者使用每种设备进行两次测量。使用 Pentacam 提供的顶点值、AS-OCT 角膜顶点切口和 USP 测量的 4 次测量的 2 个周期平均值评估 CCT。计算变异系数(COV)和组内相关系数(ICC)。为了研究不同程度角膜水肿的可重复性,将患者分为水肿程度超过/少于 CCT 的 10%、≥/< 600μm 和> 650μm CCT 的患者。

结果

每位研究者和测量设备之间未记录到显著差异。然而,在<600μm 组中,所有设备总体上差异显著(ANOVA p<0.04)。角膜水肿程度越高,设备的可重复性越低,特别是对于研究者 1 和 USP 测量。在角膜水肿程度较高时,Pentacam 并未记录到明显的角膜厚度高估。

结论

USP 测量对使用者的依赖性较高,特别是在角膜水肿程度较高时。尽管如此,所有方法在角膜水肿程度较高时均能达到 CCT 测量的高度一致性。有趣的是,在较低程度的角膜水肿时,3 种设备之间仅显示出显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验