• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.三种新型光学设备与标准超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19. eCollection 2014.
2
Comparison of anterior segment parameter values obtained with Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, optical low coherence reflectometry and noncontact specular microscopy in morbid obesity.病态肥胖患者中使用Scheimpflug - Placido角膜地形图仪、光学低相干反射测量法和非接触式镜面显微镜获得的眼前节参数值比较。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 Feb;21(3):438-445.
3
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.标准超声角膜测厚法、角膜地形图、眼压-角膜测厚法及眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):866-872. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
4
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera.使用光学低相干反射测量法、傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描术和Scheimpflug相机测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Nov-Dec;77(6):345-50. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140087.
5
Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.Scheimpflug-Placido topography 仪和光学低相干反射生物测量仪:重复性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.三种不同光学设备测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 23;13:2515841421995633. doi: 10.1177/2515841421995633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.中央角膜厚度测量值与标准超声测厚法及光学设备的比较。
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Mar;102(2):126-130. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12865. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Precision of Corneal Aberrations Measured by a New SD-OCT/Placido Topographer and Its Agreement With a Scheimpflug/Placido Topographer.新型 SD-OCT/Placido 眼前节断层扫描仪与 Scheimpflug/Placido 眼前节断层扫描仪测量角膜像差的精确性及其一致性。
J Refract Surg. 2023 Jun;39(6):405-412. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230426-02. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
9
Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry.使用Pentacam眼前节分析系统、光学低相干反射测量法角膜测厚仪和超声角膜测厚法测量中央角膜厚度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Sep;31(9):1729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058.
10
Comparison of Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness with Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Ultrasonic Pachymeter in Premature Infants.早产儿中使用光谱域光学相干断层扫描和标准超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:129269. doi: 10.1155/2015/129269. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal epithelial thickness profile at different corneal zones of normal eyes in a population sample from northern Iran: A cross-sectional study.伊朗北部人群样本中正常眼睛不同角膜区域的角膜上皮厚度分布:一项横断面研究。
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 24;18(2):144-149. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_236_23. eCollection 2025 May-Aug.
2
Comparison of the repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness mapping using optical coherence tomography according to tear film break-up time.根据泪膜破裂时间比较光学相干断层扫描测量角膜厚度的重复性和可再现性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 5;24(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03536-0.
3
Repeatability and agreement of AOCT-1000 M, RTVue XR and IOL master 500 in measuring corneal thickness mapping and axial length applying principle of optical coherence tomography.应用光学相干断层扫描原理的 AOCT-1000 M、RTVue XR 和 IOL master 500 测量角膜厚度图和眼轴重复性和一致性。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01147-7.
4
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.比较四种新设备和超声角膜测厚仪的中央角膜厚度测量值。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 28;52(5):318-323. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465.
5
Monitoring of central corneal thickness after phacoemulsification-comparison of statical and rotating Scheimpflug pachymetry, and spectral-domain OCT.白内障超声乳化术后中央角膜厚度的监测——静态与旋转式Scheimpflug角膜厚度测量法及频域光学相干断层扫描的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;15(8):1266-1272. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.08.07. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.健康眼睛中央角膜厚度测量六种方法的比较
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Feb 12;6(1):7-13. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.17894. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.三种不同光学设备测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 23;13:2515841421995633. doi: 10.1177/2515841421995633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis.用于测量中央角膜厚度的Sirius Scheimpflug - Placido与超声测厚法:荟萃分析
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Feb 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00227-5.
9
Morphogeometric analysis for characterization of keratoconus considering the spatial localization and projection of apex and minimum corneal thickness point.考虑圆锥角膜顶点和最小角膜厚度点的空间定位及投影的形态几何分析,用于圆锥角膜的特征描述。
J Adv Res. 2020 Mar 30;24:261-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.03.012. eCollection 2020 Jul.
10
Changes in the corneal thickness and limbus after 1 year of scleral contact lens use.巩膜接触镜使用 1 年后角膜厚度和角膜缘的变化。
Eye (Lond). 2020 Sep;34(9):1654-1661. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0729-z. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.一种新型 Scheimpflug 和 Placido 盘分析仪测量角膜厚度的精度及其与超声角膜测厚仪的一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.不同成像设备和超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度。
Cornea. 2013 Jun;32(6):766-71. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318269938d.
3
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes.在正常眼睛中使用超声角膜测厚法、超声生物显微镜和Artemis-2甚高频扫描仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1037-43. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S32955. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
4
Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.Scheimpflug-Placido topography 仪和光学低相干反射生物测量仪:重复性和一致性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
5
Corneal thickness, curvature, and elevation readings in normal corneas: combined Placido-Scheimpflug system versus combined Placido-scanning-slit system.正常角膜的角膜厚度、曲率和高度读数:组合式 Placido- Scheimpflug 系统与组合式 Placido-扫描狭缝系统。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7):1198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.033.
6
Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.应用 Orbscan、Pentacam、Galilei 和超声角膜测厚仪测量正常眼和飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后眼的角膜厚度。
Cornea. 2012 Sep;31(9):978-82. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823d03fc.
7
Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness.富克斯内皮性角膜营养不良严重程度与中央角膜厚度的关系。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;130(4):433-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1626.
8
Comparison of central corneal thickness using optical low-coherence reflectometry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.光学低相干反射法与谱域光相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 May;38(5):758-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.039. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
9
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with optical low-coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry and reproducibility of both devices.光学低相干反射计与超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较及两种仪器的可重复性。
Cornea. 2012 Nov;31(11):1278-81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f7701.
10
Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.中央角膜厚度测量:使用超声仪器和 4 种光学仪器。
Cornea. 2011 Nov;30(11):1238-43. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051.

三种新型光学设备与标准超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较。

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

作者信息

Bayhan Hasan Ali, Aslan Bayhan Seray, Can Izzet

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine,Y ozgat 66200, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19
PMID:24790874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4003086/
Abstract

AIM

To compare the RTVue spectral optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, Lenstar optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) devices in terms of their agreement and repeatability of measuring central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 eyes of 50 patients were included. Three repeated measures were obtained using SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and USP and five measurements were determined with the OLCR. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement among the instruments, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each comparison were calculated. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

The mean CCT by SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, OLCR, and USP were 525.90±34.08 µm, 525.92±34.10 µm, 530.30±35.62 µm, and 543.50±37.11 µm respectively. All 4 modalities of CCT measurements correlated closely with each other, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.977 to 0.995. The mean differences (and upper/lower LoA) for CCT measurements were -0.05±6.77 µm (13.3/-13.3) between SD-OCT and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 4.38±3.79 µm (11.8/-3.1) between OLCR and SD-OCT, 4.38±6.03 µm (16.2/-7.5) between OLCR and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 13.20±6.46 µm (25.9/0.5) between USP and OLCR, 17.59±6.76 µm (30.8/4.3) between USP and SD-OCT, and 17.58±8.13 µm (33.5/1.6) between USP and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs>0.98.

CONCLUSION

For most practical purposes, CCT measurements with the RTVue, Sirius and Lenstar can be used interchangeably. Although highly correlated, CCT measurement differences between USP and these 3 optical instruments can be significant depending on the clinical situation.

摘要

目的

比较RTVue光谱光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)、Sirius Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、Lenstar光学低相干反射测量仪(OLCR)和超声测厚仪(USP)在测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)方面的一致性和可重复性。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了50例患者的50只眼睛。使用SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪和USP进行三次重复测量,使用OLCR进行五次测量。采用Bland-Altman图评估仪器之间的一致性,并计算每次比较的95%一致性界限(LoA)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估检查者内部的可重复性。

结果

SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、OLCR和USP测量的平均CCT分别为525.90±34.08 µm、525.92±34.10 µm、530.30±35.62 µm和543.50±37.11 µm。所有4种CCT测量方式彼此密切相关,Pearson相关系数范围为0.977至0.995。CCT测量的平均差异(及上下LoA)在SD-OCT和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为-0.05±6.77 µm(13.3/-13.3),在OLCR和SD-OCT之间为4.38±3.79 µm(11.8/-3.1),在OLCR和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为4.38±6.03 µm(16.2/-7.5),在USP和OLCR之间为13.20±6.46 µm(25.9/0.5),在USP和SD-OCT之间为17.59±6.76 µm(30.8/4.3),在USP和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为17.58±8.13 µm(33.5/1.6)。所有设备的检查者内部可重复性均极佳,ICC>0.98。

结论

对于大多数实际应用而言,使用RTVue、Sirius和Lenstar进行的CCT测量可以互换使用。尽管相关性很高,但USP与这3种光学仪器之间的CCT测量差异在不同临床情况下可能会很显著。