Suppr超能文献

三种新型光学设备与标准超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度的比较。

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

作者信息

Bayhan Hasan Ali, Aslan Bayhan Seray, Can Izzet

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine,Y ozgat 66200, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the RTVue spectral optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, Lenstar optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) devices in terms of their agreement and repeatability of measuring central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHODS

In this prospective study, 50 eyes of 50 patients were included. Three repeated measures were obtained using SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and USP and five measurements were determined with the OLCR. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement among the instruments, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each comparison were calculated. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

The mean CCT by SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, OLCR, and USP were 525.90±34.08 µm, 525.92±34.10 µm, 530.30±35.62 µm, and 543.50±37.11 µm respectively. All 4 modalities of CCT measurements correlated closely with each other, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.977 to 0.995. The mean differences (and upper/lower LoA) for CCT measurements were -0.05±6.77 µm (13.3/-13.3) between SD-OCT and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 4.38±3.79 µm (11.8/-3.1) between OLCR and SD-OCT, 4.38±6.03 µm (16.2/-7.5) between OLCR and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 13.20±6.46 µm (25.9/0.5) between USP and OLCR, 17.59±6.76 µm (30.8/4.3) between USP and SD-OCT, and 17.58±8.13 µm (33.5/1.6) between USP and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs>0.98.

CONCLUSION

For most practical purposes, CCT measurements with the RTVue, Sirius and Lenstar can be used interchangeably. Although highly correlated, CCT measurement differences between USP and these 3 optical instruments can be significant depending on the clinical situation.

摘要

目的

比较RTVue光谱光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)、Sirius Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、Lenstar光学低相干反射测量仪(OLCR)和超声测厚仪(USP)在测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)方面的一致性和可重复性。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了50例患者的50只眼睛。使用SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪和USP进行三次重复测量,使用OLCR进行五次测量。采用Bland-Altman图评估仪器之间的一致性,并计算每次比较的95%一致性界限(LoA)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估检查者内部的可重复性。

结果

SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、OLCR和USP测量的平均CCT分别为525.90±34.08 µm、525.92±34.10 µm、530.30±35.62 µm和543.50±37.11 µm。所有4种CCT测量方式彼此密切相关,Pearson相关系数范围为0.977至0.995。CCT测量的平均差异(及上下LoA)在SD-OCT和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为-0.05±6.77 µm(13.3/-13.3),在OLCR和SD-OCT之间为4.38±3.79 µm(11.8/-3.1),在OLCR和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为4.38±6.03 µm(16.2/-7.5),在USP和OLCR之间为13.20±6.46 µm(25.9/0.5),在USP和SD-OCT之间为17.59±6.76 µm(30.8/4.3),在USP和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为17.58±8.13 µm(33.5/1.6)。所有设备的检查者内部可重复性均极佳,ICC>0.98。

结论

对于大多数实际应用而言,使用RTVue、Sirius和Lenstar进行的CCT测量可以互换使用。尽管相关性很高,但USP与这3种光学仪器之间的CCT测量差异在不同临床情况下可能会很显著。

相似文献

1
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19. eCollection 2014.
5
Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 23;13:2515841421995633. doi: 10.1177/2515841421995633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
7
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.
Clin Exp Optom. 2019 Mar;102(2):126-130. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12865. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Precision of Corneal Aberrations Measured by a New SD-OCT/Placido Topographer and Its Agreement With a Scheimpflug/Placido Topographer.
J Refract Surg. 2023 Jun;39(6):405-412. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230426-02. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Corneal epithelial thickness profile at different corneal zones of normal eyes in a population sample from northern Iran: A cross-sectional study.
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 24;18(2):144-149. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_236_23. eCollection 2025 May-Aug.
4
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Four Different New Devices and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct 28;52(5):318-323. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.22465.
6
Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Feb 12;6(1):7-13. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.17894. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 23;13:2515841421995633. doi: 10.1177/2515841421995633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis.
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Feb 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00227-5.
10
Changes in the corneal thickness and limbus after 1 year of scleral contact lens use.
Eye (Lond). 2020 Sep;34(9):1654-1661. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0729-z. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.034. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
2
Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry.
Cornea. 2013 Jun;32(6):766-71. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318269938d.
4
Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer: repeatability and agreement.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Relationship of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy severity to central corneal thickness.
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;130(4):433-9. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1626.
8
Comparison of central corneal thickness using optical low-coherence reflectometry and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 May;38(5):758-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.11.039. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.
Cornea. 2011 Nov;30(11):1238-43. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验