Bayhan Hasan Ali, Aslan Bayhan Seray, Can Izzet
Department of Ophthalmology, Bozok University Faculty of Medicine,Y ozgat 66200, Turkey.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302-8. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19. eCollection 2014.
To compare the RTVue spectral optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, Lenstar optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) devices in terms of their agreement and repeatability of measuring central corneal thickness (CCT).
In this prospective study, 50 eyes of 50 patients were included. Three repeated measures were obtained using SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer and USP and five measurements were determined with the OLCR. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement among the instruments, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for each comparison were calculated. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
The mean CCT by SD-OCT, Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, OLCR, and USP were 525.90±34.08 µm, 525.92±34.10 µm, 530.30±35.62 µm, and 543.50±37.11 µm respectively. All 4 modalities of CCT measurements correlated closely with each other, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.977 to 0.995. The mean differences (and upper/lower LoA) for CCT measurements were -0.05±6.77 µm (13.3/-13.3) between SD-OCT and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 4.38±3.79 µm (11.8/-3.1) between OLCR and SD-OCT, 4.38±6.03 µm (16.2/-7.5) between OLCR and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer, 13.20±6.46 µm (25.9/0.5) between USP and OLCR, 17.59±6.76 µm (30.8/4.3) between USP and SD-OCT, and 17.58±8.13 µm (33.5/1.6) between USP and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs>0.98.
For most practical purposes, CCT measurements with the RTVue, Sirius and Lenstar can be used interchangeably. Although highly correlated, CCT measurement differences between USP and these 3 optical instruments can be significant depending on the clinical situation.
比较RTVue光谱光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)、Sirius Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、Lenstar光学低相干反射测量仪(OLCR)和超声测厚仪(USP)在测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)方面的一致性和可重复性。
在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了50例患者的50只眼睛。使用SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪和USP进行三次重复测量,使用OLCR进行五次测量。采用Bland-Altman图评估仪器之间的一致性,并计算每次比较的95%一致性界限(LoA)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估检查者内部的可重复性。
SD-OCT、Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪、OLCR和USP测量的平均CCT分别为525.90±34.08 µm、525.92±34.10 µm、530.30±35.62 µm和543.50±37.11 µm。所有4种CCT测量方式彼此密切相关,Pearson相关系数范围为0.977至0.995。CCT测量的平均差异(及上下LoA)在SD-OCT和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为-0.05±6.77 µm(13.3/-13.3),在OLCR和SD-OCT之间为4.38±3.79 µm(11.8/-3.1),在OLCR和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为4.38±6.03 µm(16.2/-7.5),在USP和OLCR之间为13.20±6.46 µm(25.9/0.5),在USP和SD-OCT之间为17.59±6.76 µm(30.8/4.3),在USP和Scheimpflug-普拉西多角膜地形图仪之间为17.58±8.13 µm(33.5/1.6)。所有设备的检查者内部可重复性均极佳,ICC>0.98。
对于大多数实际应用而言,使用RTVue、Sirius和Lenstar进行的CCT测量可以互换使用。尽管相关性很高,但USP与这3种光学仪器之间的CCT测量差异在不同临床情况下可能会很显著。