Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Pharos, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):306-317. doi: 10.1111/hex.13034. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
This study aimed to explore whether positive impacts were sustained and unanticipated ripple effects had occurred four years after the implementation of interventions to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care.
Sustaining the implementation of change using complex interventions is challenging. The EU-funded "RESTORE" study implemented guidelines and training on cross-cultural communication in five Primary Care sites in Europe, combining implementation theory (Normalisation Process Theory) with participatory methodology (participatory learning and action-PLA). There were positive impacts on knowledge, skills and clinical routines.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Four of the five original sites (England, Ireland, Greece, The Netherlands) were available for this qualitative follow-up study. The study population (N = 44) was primary healthcare staff and migrants, most of whom had participated in RESTORE. INTERVENTION; MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PLA-style focus groups and interviews explored routine practice during consultations with migrants. Etic cards based on the effects of RESTORE stimulated the discussion. Deductive framework analysis was performed in each country followed by comparative data analysis and synthesis.
Changes in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour with regard to consultations with migrants were sustained and migrants felt empowered by their participation in RESTORE. There were ongoing concerns about macro level factors, like the political climate and financial policies, negatively affecting migrant healthcare.
There were sustained effects in clinical settings, and additional unanticipated positive ripple effects, due in part, from the participatory approach employed.
本研究旨在探讨在实施改善初级保健中跨文化交流的干预措施四年后,是否仍能保持积极影响,以及是否出现了意想不到的连锁反应。
使用复杂干预措施维持变革的实施具有挑战性。这项由欧盟资助的“RESTORE”研究在欧洲的五个初级保健点实施了跨文化交流的指南和培训,将实施理论(常规化进程理论)与参与性方法(参与式学习和行动-PLA)相结合。该研究对知识、技能和临床常规产生了积极影响。
设计、设置和参与者:本研究对最初的五个地点中的四个(英国、爱尔兰、希腊、荷兰)进行了定性随访研究。研究人群(N=44)为初级保健工作人员和移民,其中大多数人曾参与过“RESTORE”项目。
干预措施;主要观察指标:以 PLA 风格进行的焦点小组和访谈探讨了与移民进行咨询时的常规做法。基于“RESTORE”效果的伦理卡片激发了讨论。在每个国家都进行了演绎框架分析,然后进行了比较数据分析和综合。
与移民进行咨询的知识、态度和行为方面的变化得到了维持,移民们通过参与“RESTORE”项目感到自己有了力量。他们仍然对宏观层面的因素感到担忧,例如政治气候和财政政策对移民医疗保健的负面影响。
临床环境中仍有持续的效果,部分原因是采用了参与性方法,还出现了意想不到的积极连锁反应。