Kim Hyeun Sung, Raorane Harshavardhan D, Wu Pang Hung, Heo Dong Hwa, Sharma Sagar B, Jang Il-Tae
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanoori Hospital Gangnam, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:e13-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.242. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
We sought to review the types of incidental durotomies (IDs) that occurred during the endoscopic stenosis lumbar decompression through interlaminar approach (ESLD) and discuss the management strategies according to our classification.
A retrospective evaluation was performed for patients with spinal stenosis who underwent ESLD. Out of 330 patients, 27 patients of ID were clinically evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively on the basis of a visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, and MacNab's criteria. ID patterns are classified according to the size, location, and involvement of neural elements. Intraoperative and postoperative surgical management was evaluated.
Intraoperative incidence of ID was 8.2%. According to lumbar levels, 11 (40.7%) occurred at L3-4, 12 (44.4%) at L4-5, and 4 (14.8%) at L5-S1 ID cases. IDs were divided into 4 types: 29.6% are type 1, 70% are type 2, 7.4% are type 3, and 3.7% are type 4. Overall for mean and standard deviation preoperative, 1 week postoperative, 3 months, and final follow-up for visual analog scale are 7.6 ± 1.4, 3.3 ± 1.1, 2.6 ± 1.1, and 1.9 ± 1.3, and for Oswestry Disability Index are 74.5 ± 9.0, 32.3 ± 9.4, 27.3 ± 7.2, and 24.4 ± 6.5 after patch blocking dura repair of ID.
ID is a more common surgical complication in ESLD compared with the transforaminal approach. The endoscopic patch blocking dura repair technique should be considered in type 1 to type 3A of dura tear with good prognosis and clinical outcome. Consideration is made for conversion to open repair in types 3B, 3C and 4 dura tears with fair to poor outcome.
我们试图回顾经椎间孔入路内镜下腰椎管狭窄减压术(ESLD)期间发生的意外硬膜切开术(ID)的类型,并根据我们的分类讨论管理策略。
对接受ESLD的腰椎管狭窄患者进行回顾性评估。在330例患者中,27例ID患者在术前和术后根据视觉模拟量表评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数和MacNab标准进行临床评估。ID模式根据大小、位置和神经元件受累情况进行分类。评估术中及术后的手术管理。
ID的术中发生率为8.2%。根据腰椎节段,11例(40.7%)发生在L3 - 4,12例(44.4%)发生在L4 - 5,4例(14.8%)发生在L5 - S1的ID病例。ID分为4种类型:1型占29.6%,2型占70%,3型占7.4%,4型占3.7%。总体而言,术前、术后1周、3个月及最终随访时,ID修补硬膜后的视觉模拟量表平均及标准差分别为7.6±1.4、3.3±1.1、2.6±1.1和1.9±1.3,Oswestry功能障碍指数分别为74.5±9.0、32.3±9.4、27.3±7.2和24.4±6.5。
与经椎间孔入路相比,ID是ESLD中更常见的手术并发症。对于预后和临床结果良好的1型至3A型硬膜撕裂,应考虑采用内镜修补硬膜技术。对于预后一般至较差的3B型、3C型和4型硬膜撕裂,考虑转为开放修复。