• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Network Analysis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in a National Sample of U.S. Adults: Implications for the Phenotype and the ICD-11 Model of PTSD.美国成年人全国样本中创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析:对表型和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍模型的影响。
J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):52-63. doi: 10.1002/jts.22481. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
2
Network models of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for ICD-11.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍的网络模型:对《国际疾病分类》第11版的启示
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Apr;126(3):355-366. doi: 10.1037/abn0000252. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
3
An evaluation of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder criteria in two samples of adolescents and young adults exposed to mass shootings: factor analysis and comparisons to ICD-10 and DSM-IV.对遭受大规模枪击事件的青少年和青年两个样本中ICD - 11创伤后应激障碍标准的评估:因素分析以及与ICD - 10和DSM - IV的比较
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:140. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0849-y.
4
Evaluating the stability of DSM-5 PTSD symptom network structure in a national sample of U.S. military veterans.评估 DSM-5 PTSD 症状网络结构在美退役军人全国样本中的稳定性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Posttraumatic stress disorder among older adults: A differential item functioning analysis of PTSD in ICD-11 and DSM-5.老年人创伤后应激障碍:ICD-11 和 DSM-5 中 PTSD 的差异项目功能分析。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Oct;12(7):799-806. doi: 10.1037/tra0000596. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in DSM-5 and ICD-11: Clinical and Behavioral Correlates.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 中的创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍:临床和行为相关性。
J Trauma Stress. 2018 Apr;31(2):174-180. doi: 10.1002/jts.22272. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
Examining the diagnostic utility of the DSM-5 PTSD symptoms among male and female returning veterans.研究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版创伤后应激障碍症状在退伍男性和女性中的诊断效用。
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Aug;34(8):752-760. doi: 10.1002/da.22667. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
8
Exploring mood symptoms overlap in PTSD diagnosis: ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria compared in a sample of subjects with Bipolar Disorder.探讨创伤后应激障碍诊断中情绪症状的重叠:在双相情感障碍患者样本中比较 ICD-11 和 DSM-5 标准。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.056. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
A comparison of ICD-11 and DSM criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in two national samples of U.S. military veterans.美国退伍军人两个全国性样本中创伤后应激障碍的国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)标准比较
J Affect Disord. 2017 Dec 1;223:17-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
Comparing diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder in a diverse sample of trauma-exposed youth.比较创伤后应激障碍在不同创伤暴露青年样本中的诊断标准。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Aug;37(4):606-616. doi: 10.1002/jts.23037. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the 5C model to understand COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy across a National and South Carolina sample.利用 5C 模型理解全国和南卡罗来纳州样本中的 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫情况。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Apr;160:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
2
The Italian Version of the International Trauma Questionnaire: Symptom and Network Structure of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in a Sample of Late Adolescents Exposed to a Natural Disaster.国际创伤问卷的意大利语版本:在经历自然灾害的青少年晚期样本中创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的症状及网络结构
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 25;13:859877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859877. eCollection 2022.
3
Examining the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a black community sample using item response theory.采用项目反应理论考察黑人社区样本中 PCL-5 的心理测量特性。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102555. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria.基于 DSM-5 与 ICD-11 标准的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的验证性因子分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jan 19;13(1):2010995. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2010995. eCollection 2022.
5
Cross-cultural investigation of COVID-19 related acute stress: A network analysis.跨文化调查 COVID-19 相关急性应激:网络分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Nov;143:309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
6
The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: Psychometric Properties among Earthquake Survivors.儿童创伤后应激症状量表:地震幸存者中的心理测量特性。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Dec;52(6):1184-1193. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01097-z. Epub 2020 Nov 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Examination of posttraumatic stress disorder symptom networks using clinician-rated and patient-rated data.使用临床医生评定和患者自评数据来检查创伤后应激障碍症状网络。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Aug;127(6):541-547. doi: 10.1037/abn0000368.
2
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.正则化偏相关网络教程。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634. doi: 10.1037/met0000167. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
False alarm? A comprehensive reanalysis of "Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability" by Forbes, Wright, Markon, and Krueger (2017).误报?对福布斯、赖特、马尔科恩和克鲁格(2017年)所著的《心理病理学症状网络的可复制性有限的证据》进行全面重新分析
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):989-999. doi: 10.1037/abn0000306.
4
Evidence that psychopathology symptom networks have limited replicability.精神病理学症状网络具有有限可重复性的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Oct;126(7):969-988. doi: 10.1037/abn0000276.
5
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.估计心理网络及其准确性:教程论文。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1.
6
What are psychological constructs? On the nature and statistical modelling of emotions, intelligence, personality traits and mental disorders.什么是心理构念?关于情绪、智力、人格特质和精神障碍的本质及统计建模。
Health Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;11(2):130-134. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2017.1306718.
7
Network models of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder: Implications for ICD-11.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版创伤后应激障碍的网络模型:对《国际疾病分类》第11版的启示
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Apr;126(3):355-366. doi: 10.1037/abn0000252. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
8
A network theory of mental disorders.精神障碍的网络理论。
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/wps.20375.
9
Networks and Nosology in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.创伤后应激障碍中的网络与疾病分类学
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):124-125. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3344.
10
A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in U.S. military veterans.DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍症状与美国退伍军人相关因素的网络分析。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Jan;45:49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

美国成年人全国样本中创伤后应激障碍症状的网络分析:对表型和 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍模型的影响。

Network Analysis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in a National Sample of U.S. Adults: Implications for the Phenotype and the ICD-11 Model of PTSD.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2020 Feb;33(1):52-63. doi: 10.1002/jts.22481. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1002/jts.22481
PMID:32103539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8996824/
Abstract

The phenotype for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases (DSM-5) includes 20 symptoms in four clusters. In contrast, the PTSD model in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) includes six symptoms in three clusters. Whether those six symptoms are, in fact, the most central symptoms of the PTSD phenotype remains an open question. In a previous network analysis of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms, Mitchell and colleagues (2017) reported limited overlap between central PTSD symptoms and those in the ICD-11 model in a national sample of U.S. veterans. The present study sought to replicate and extend upon these findings in a large national sample of U.S. adults (N = 2,953). Centrality statistics from both a replication sample (i.e., participants with DSM-5 PTSD, n = 173) and an extension sample (i.e., participants who had been exposed to potentially traumatic events, n = 2,468) were moderately strongly convergent with the findings reported by Mitchell et al., rs = .54-.73. Additionally, only three of the six most central symptoms in both the replication and extension samples overlapped with the ICD-11 model, indicating that the ICD-11 model (a) failed to include network-central symptoms of the PTSD phenotype and (b) included extra symptoms that were not network-central. Several symptoms from the DSM-5 Criterion D cluster (negative alterations in cognition and mood) that were excluded in ICD-11 were found to be among the most central PTSD symptoms.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的表型在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)中包括四个集群的 20 个症状。相比之下,《国际疾病分类》第 11 版(ICD-11)中的 PTSD 模型包括三个集群中的六个症状。这六个症状是否实际上是 PTSD 表型的最核心症状仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在 Mitchell 及其同事(2017 年)对 DSM-5 PTSD 症状的网络分析中,报告称在美国退伍军人的全国样本中,核心 PTSD 症状与 ICD-11 模型之间存在有限的重叠。本研究试图在美国成年人的大型全国样本(N=2953)中复制和扩展这些发现。来自复制样本(即患有 DSM-5 PTSD 的参与者,n=173)和扩展样本(即经历过可能创伤性事件的参与者,n=2468)的中心性统计数据与 Mitchell 等人报告的结果中度强烈一致,rs=.54-.73。此外,在复制样本和扩展样本中,仅有六个最核心症状中的三个与 ICD-11 模型重叠,这表明 ICD-11 模型(a)未能包括 PTSD 表型的网络中心症状,(b)包括了不是网络中心的额外症状。在 ICD-11 中被排除的 DSM-5 标准 D 集群(认知和情绪的负性改变)中的几个症状被发现是最核心的 PTSD 症状之一。