• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用稀疏实验室数据预测急诊科发热患者的不良结局:一种时间自适应模型的开发

Predicting Adverse Outcomes for Febrile Patients in the Emergency Department Using Sparse Laboratory Data: Development of a Time Adaptive Model.

作者信息

Lee Sungjoo, Hong Sungjun, Cha Won Chul, Kim Kyunga

机构信息

Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 26;8(3):e16117. doi: 10.2196/16117.

DOI:10.2196/16117
PMID:32213477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7146241/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A timely decision in the initial stages for patients with an acute illness is important. However, only a few studies have determined the prognosis of patients based on insufficient laboratory data during the initial stages of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate time adaptive prediction models to predict the severity of illness in the emergency department (ED) using highly sparse laboratory test data (test order status and test results) and a machine learning approach.

METHODS

This retrospective study used ED data from a tertiary academic hospital in Seoul, Korea. Two different models were developed based on laboratory test data: order status only (OSO) and order status and results (OSR) models. A binary composite adverse outcome was used, including mortality or hospitalization in the intensive care unit. Both models were evaluated using various performance criteria, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and balanced accuracy (BA). Clinical usefulness was examined by determining the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR).

RESULTS

Of 9491 eligible patients in the ED (mean age, 55.2 years, SD 17.7 years; 4839/9491, 51.0% women), the model development cohort and validation cohort included 6645 and 2846 patients, respectively. The OSR model generally exhibited better performance (AUC=0.88, BA=0.81) than the OSO model (AUC=0.80, BA=0.74). The OSR model was more informative than the OSO model to predict patients at low or high risk of adverse outcomes (P<.001 for differences in both PLR and NLR).

CONCLUSIONS

Early-stage adverse outcomes for febrile patients could be predicted using machine learning models of highly sparse data including test order status and laboratory test results. This prediction tool could help medical professionals who are simultaneously treating the same patient share information, lead dynamic communication, and consequently prevent medical errors.

摘要

背景

对于急性病患者,在初始阶段做出及时决策很重要。然而,仅有少数研究基于治疗初始阶段不充分的实验室数据来确定患者的预后。

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证时间自适应预测模型,以使用高度稀疏的实验室检测数据(检测医嘱状态和检测结果)及机器学习方法来预测急诊科患者的疾病严重程度。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用了韩国首尔一家三级学术医院的急诊科数据。基于实验室检测数据开发了两种不同模型:仅医嘱状态(OSO)模型和医嘱状态与结果(OSR)模型。采用二元复合不良结局,包括死亡或入住重症监护病房。使用包括受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和平衡准确性(BA)在内的各种性能标准对两种模型进行评估。通过确定阳性似然比(PLR)和阴性似然比(NLR)来检验临床实用性。

结果

在急诊科的9491例符合条件的患者中(平均年龄55.2岁,标准差17.7岁;4839/9491,51.0%为女性),模型开发队列和验证队列分别包括6645例和2846例患者。OSR模型总体表现(AUC = 0.88,BA = 0.81)优于OSO模型(AUC = 0.80,BA = 0.74)。在预测不良结局低风险或高风险患者方面,OSR模型比OSO模型更具信息量(PLR和NLR的差异均P<0.001)。

结论

使用包括检测医嘱状态和实验室检测结果在内的高度稀疏数据的机器学习模型,可以预测发热患者的早期不良结局。这种预测工具可以帮助同时治疗同一患者的医疗专业人员共享信息、进行动态沟通,从而预防医疗差错。

相似文献

1
Predicting Adverse Outcomes for Febrile Patients in the Emergency Department Using Sparse Laboratory Data: Development of a Time Adaptive Model.利用稀疏实验室数据预测急诊科发热患者的不良结局:一种时间自适应模型的开发
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 26;8(3):e16117. doi: 10.2196/16117.
2
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
3
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
4
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
5
Machine Learning to Predict Three Types of Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Data at Admission: A Multi-Center Study for Development and Validation.机器学习使用入院时的数据预测创伤性脑损伤后的三种结局:一项用于开发和验证的多中心研究。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Aug;40(15-16):1694-1706. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0515. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
6
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Need for Hospitalization for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation at the Time of Emergency Department Triage.一种机器学习方法,用于预测儿科哮喘急诊分诊时需要住院治疗的情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1463-1470. doi: 10.1111/acem.13655. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
7
Prediction of bacteremia at the emergency department during triage and disposition stages using machine learning models.使用机器学习模型预测分诊和处置阶段急诊科的菌血症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.12.065. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.
10
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Classification Model Predicting Postoperative Adverse Outcomes in Older Surgical Patients Using a Machine Learning Algorithm: Retrospective Observational Network Study.基于机器学习算法的老年外科患者术后不良结局预测预后分类模型的建立与验证:回顾性观察性网络研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 13;25:e42259. doi: 10.2196/42259.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of artificial intelligence predicting emergency department dispositions.人工智能预测急诊科处置情况诊断测试准确性的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 May 15;25(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03010-x.
2
Has the Flood Entered the Basement? A Systematic Literature Review about Machine Learning in Laboratory Medicine.洪水已侵入地下室了吗?关于检验医学中机器学习的系统文献综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 22;11(2):372. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020372.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting in-hospital mortality and unanticipated admissions to the intensive care unit using routinely collected blood tests and vital signs: Development and validation of a multivariable model.利用常规采集的血液检测和生命体征预测院内死亡率和 ICU 非预期转入:多变量模型的建立和验证。
Resuscitation. 2018 Dec;133:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
2
Enhancing the Clinical Value of Medical Laboratory Testing.提高医学检验的临床价值。
Clin Biochem Rev. 2017 Nov;38(3):107-114.
3
Routine blood tests are associated with short term mortality and can improve emergency department triage: a cohort study of >12,000 patients.
常规血液检查与短期死亡率相关,并能改善急诊科分诊:一项超过 12000 名患者的队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 28;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0458-x.
4
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
6
Multidisciplinary in-hospital teams improve patient outcomes: A review.多学科院内团队改善患者治疗效果:一项综述。
Surg Neurol Int. 2014 Aug 28;5(Suppl 7):S295-303. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.139612. eCollection 2014.
7
Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.净重新分类改善:计算、解释和争议:文献综述及临床医生指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):122-31. doi: 10.7326/M13-1522.
8
Fever in sepsis: is it cool to be hot?脓毒症中的发热:发热是否有益?
Crit Care. 2014 Feb 13;18(1):109. doi: 10.1186/cc13726.
9
The International Federation for Emergency Medicine framework for quality and safety in the emergency department.国际急诊医学联合会急诊科质量与安全框架
Emerg Med J. 2014 Nov;31(11):926-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203000. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Index blood tests and national early warning scores within 24 hours of emergency admission can predict the risk of in-hospital mortality: a model development and validation study.入院 24 小时内进行的指数血液检查和国家早期预警评分可以预测住院死亡率的风险:一项模型开发和验证研究。
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064340. Print 2013.