Suppr超能文献

人际心理治疗与常规治疗对与工作压力相关的重度抑郁症的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的初步研究

Interpersonal Psychotherapy vs. Treatment as Usual for Major Depression Related to Work Stress: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

作者信息

Schramm Elisabeth, Mack Simon, Thiel Nicola, Jenkner Carolin, Elsaesser Moritz, Fangmeier Thomas

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Hochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 18;11:193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00193. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Depressive disorders are among the leading causes of sick leave and long-term work incapacity in most modern countries. Work related stress is described by patients as the most common context of depression. It is vital to know what types of treatments are effective in improving work related problems and occupational health. However, there is only limited evidence on work-focused interventions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and generate first data on the effectiveness of Interpersonal Psychotherapy (IPT) adapted as a group program to focus on the work context (W-IPT). In total, 28 outpatients (22 women; = 49.8 years old) with Major Depressive Disorder related to work stress were randomized to 8 weekly group sessions of W-IPT or to treatment as usual (TAU; guideline oriented treatment). Primary endpoint was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24) score. Key secondary endpoints were, among others, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), Work Ability Index (WAI), Return to Work Attitude (RTW-SE), and the Effort-Reward-Imbalance (ERI). In addition, we evaluated the participants' overall satisfaction with the W-IPT program by two items. A follow-up assessment was conducted 3 months after end of acute treatment. W-IPT was significantly more effective than TAU in reducing clinician-assessed depressive symptoms at follow-up (HRSD-24 W-IPT/TAU: = 6.6/12.0, SE: 1.46/2.17, t = -2.24, = 0.035, = 0.79) and self-assessed depression (BDI-II W-IPT/TAU post-treatment: = 8.8/18.8, SE: 1.69/2.70, t = -3.82, = 0.001, = 1.28; follow-up: = 8.8/16.1, SE: 1.62/2.26, t = -2.62, = 0.015, = 0.99). Furthermore, W-IPT was superior in improving work-ability (WAI), return-to-work attitude (RTW-SE), and the effort-reward-ratio (ERI). No dropouts were observed in both groups. The vast majority (89 percent) of participants in the W-IPT condition were "very satisfied" with the program, although wishing for a greater number of sessions (75 percent). A work-focused IPT program for the treatment of depression associated to work stress was feasible and highly acceptable. W-IPT turned out to be more effective than standard treatment in reducing depression and work-related problems. However, further evidence in a multicenter trial extending this pilot study is necessary.

摘要

在大多数现代国家,抑郁症是病假和长期工作能力丧失的主要原因之一。患者将工作相关压力描述为抑郁症最常见的背景。了解哪些类型的治疗方法对改善工作相关问题和职业健康有效至关重要。然而,关于以工作为重点的干预措施的证据有限。我们研究的目的是评估人际心理治疗(IPT)作为一种针对工作背景的团体项目(W-IPT)的可行性,并生成关于其有效性的初步数据。共有28名与工作压力相关的重度抑郁症门诊患者(22名女性;平均年龄49.8岁)被随机分为接受8次每周一次的W-IPT团体治疗或常规治疗(TAU;基于指南的治疗)。主要终点是汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD-24)得分。关键次要终点包括贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)、工作能力指数(WAI)、重返工作态度(RTW-SE)和努力-回报失衡(ERI)等。此外,我们通过两个项目评估了参与者对W-IPT项目的总体满意度。在急性治疗结束后3个月进行随访评估。在随访时,W-IPT在减轻临床医生评估的抑郁症状方面比TAU显著更有效(HRSD-24 W-IPT/TAU:分别为6.6/12.0,标准误:1.46/2.17,t=-2.24,p=0.035,效应量=0.79)以及自我评估的抑郁(治疗后BDI-II W-IPT/TAU:分别为8.8/18.8,标准误:1.69/2.70,t=-3.82,p=0.001,效应量=1.28;随访时:分别为8.8/16.1,标准误:1.62/2.26,t=-2.62,p=0.015,效应量=0.99)。此外,W-IPT在改善工作能力(WAI)、重返工作态度(RTW-SE)和努力-回报比(ERI)方面更具优势。两组均未观察到退出者。W-IPT组绝大多数(89%)参与者对该项目“非常满意”,尽管希望增加治疗次数(75%)。一种针对与工作压力相关抑郁症治疗的以工作为重点的IPT项目是可行的且高度可接受。事实证明,W-IPT在减轻抑郁和工作相关问题方面比标准治疗更有效。然而,有必要在一项扩展该试点研究的多中心试验中获取更多证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/458e/7093578/5d1fd310ae7a/fpsyt-11-00193-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验