• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算表型分析:利用模型理解人格、发展和精神疾病中的个体差异。

Computational Phenotyping: Using Models to Understand Individual Differences in Personality, Development, and Mental Illness.

作者信息

Patzelt Edward H, Hartley Catherine A, Gershman Samuel J

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Personal Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;1:e18. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.14. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1017/pen.2018.14
PMID:32435735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7219680/
Abstract

This paper reviews progress in the application of computational models to personality, developmental, and clinical neuroscience. We first describe the concept of a computational phenotype, a collection of parameters derived from computational models fit to behavioral and neural data. This approach represents individuals as points in a continuous parameter space, complementing traditional trait and symptom measures. One key advantage of this representation is that it is mechanistic: The parameters have interpretations in terms of cognitive processes, which can be translated into quantitative predictions about future behavior and brain activity. We illustrate with several examples how this approach has led to new scientific insights into individual differences, developmental trajectories, and psychopathology. We then survey some of the challenges that lay ahead.

摘要

本文回顾了计算模型在人格、发展和临床神经科学中的应用进展。我们首先描述计算表型的概念,即从拟合行为和神经数据的计算模型中得出的一组参数。这种方法将个体表示为连续参数空间中的点,对传统的特质和症状测量起到补充作用。这种表示的一个关键优势在于它是机械性的:这些参数可以根据认知过程进行解释,进而转化为对未来行为和大脑活动的定量预测。我们通过几个例子来说明这种方法如何为个体差异、发展轨迹和精神病理学带来新的科学见解。然后,我们探讨了未来面临的一些挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d35/7219680/16722cda32dc/S2513988618000147_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d35/7219680/16722cda32dc/S2513988618000147_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d35/7219680/16722cda32dc/S2513988618000147_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Computational Phenotyping: Using Models to Understand Individual Differences in Personality, Development, and Mental Illness.计算表型分析:利用模型理解人格、发展和精神疾病中的个体差异。
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Oct 18;1:e18. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.14. eCollection 2018.
2
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
3
Parameters as Trait Indicators: Exploring a Complementary Neurocomputational Approach to Conceptualizing and Measuring Trait Differences in Emotional Intelligence.作为特质指标的参数:探索一种用于概念化和测量情商特质差异的互补性神经计算方法。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 18;10:848. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00848. eCollection 2019.
4
Different Ways of Linking Behavioral and Neural Data via Computational Cognitive Models.通过计算认知模型将行为数据与神经数据相联系的不同方法。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Mar;1(2):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Computational Phenotyping in Psychiatry: A Worked Example.精神病学中的计算表型:一个实例研究。
eNeuro. 2016 Aug 2;3(4). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0049-16.2016. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
6
Using personality neuroscience to study personality disorder.运用人格神经科学研究人格障碍。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):2-13. doi: 10.1037/per0000195.
7
Testing the role of reward and punishment sensitivity in avoidance behavior: a computational modeling approach.测试奖惩敏感性在回避行为中的作用:一种计算建模方法。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Apr 15;283:121-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.033. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
8
Individual differences in the acquisition of affectively valenced associations.情感效价联想习得中的个体差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Apr;74(4):1024-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.1024.
9
What motivates adolescents? Neural responses to rewards and their influence on adolescents' risk taking, learning, and cognitive control.是什么激励着青少年?对奖励的神经反应及其对青少年冒险、学习和认知控制的影响。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Nov;70:135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
10
Individual differences and the neural representations of reward expectation and reward prediction error.个体差异与奖励预期和奖励预测误差的神经表现。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Mar;2(1):20-30. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl021.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning Improves Parameter Estimation in Reinforcement Learning Models.深度学习改进强化学习模型中的参数估计。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jun 18:2025.03.21.644663. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.21.644663.
2
A computational cognitive neuroscience approach for characterizing individual differences in autism: Introduction to Special Issue.一种用于刻画自闭症个体差异的计算认知神经科学方法:特刊引言
Personal Neurosci. 2025 Apr 10;8:e2. doi: 10.1017/pen.2025.2. eCollection 2025.
3
Test-retest reliability of computational parameters versus manifest behavior for decisional flexibility in psychosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational Nosology and Precision Psychiatry.计算疾病分类学与精准精神病学
Comput Psychiatr. 2017;1:2-23. doi: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00001. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
2
Cost-Benefit Arbitration Between Multiple Reinforcement-Learning Systems.多强化学习系统的成本效益仲裁。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1321-1333. doi: 10.1177/0956797617708288. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
When Habits Are Dangerous: Alcohol Expectancies and Habitual Decision Making Predict Relapse in Alcohol Dependence.当习惯变得危险:酒精预期和习惯性决策预测酒精依赖的复发。
精神病患者决策灵活性的计算参数与明显行为的重测信度
Psychol Assess. 2025 Jun-Jul;37(6-7):273-287. doi: 10.1037/pas0001383. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
4
Sensation seeking and risk adjustment: the role of reward sensitivity in dynamic risky decisions.寻求刺激与风险调整:奖励敏感性在动态风险决策中的作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Feb 7;19:1492312. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1492312. eCollection 2025.
5
Computational Phenotyping of Cognitive Decline With Retest Learning.基于重测学习的认知衰退计算表型分析
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jun 10;80(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf030.
6
Interpretation of individual differences in computational neuroscience using a latent input approach.使用潜在输入方法对计算神经科学中的个体差异进行解释。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Apr;72:101512. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101512. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
7
Introducing ActiveInference.jl: A Julia Library for Simulation and Parameter Estimation with Active Inference Models.介绍ActiveInference.jl:一个用于使用主动推理模型进行模拟和参数估计的Julia库。
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Jan 12;27(1):62. doi: 10.3390/e27010062.
8
Increasing the Construct Validity of Computational Phenotypes of Mental Illness Through Active Inference and Brain Imaging.通过主动推理和脑成像提高精神疾病计算表型的结构效度
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1278. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121278.
9
Individual differences in autism-like traits are associated with reduced goal emulation in a computational model of observational learning.在观察学习的计算模型中,类自闭症特征的个体差异与目标模仿减少有关。
Nat Ment Health. 2024 Sep;2(9):1032-1044. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00287-1. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
10
Test-retest reliability of behavioral and computational measures of advice taking under volatility.在波动性下,采取建议的行为和计算测量的重测信度。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0312255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312255. eCollection 2024.
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;82(11):847-856. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 May 22.
4
Computational Psychosomatics and Computational Psychiatry: Toward a Joint Framework for Differential Diagnosis.计算心身医学和计算精神病学:迈向差异化诊断的联合框架。
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 25.
5
Model-Based Control in Dimensional Psychiatry.基于模型的精神医学维度控制。
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 15;82(6):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
6
The new field of 'precision psychiatry'.“精准精神病学”这一新兴领域。
BMC Med. 2017 Apr 13;15(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0849-x.
7
Factor analysis linking functions for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data.因子分析连接函数,用于同时对神经和行为数据进行建模。
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:28-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.044. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
8
No association of goal-directed and habitual control with alcohol consumption in young adults.年轻人的目标导向控制和习惯控制与饮酒量无关。
Addict Biol. 2018 Jan;23(1):379-393. doi: 10.1111/adb.12490. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
9
Using personality neuroscience to study personality disorder.运用人格神经科学研究人格障碍。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):2-13. doi: 10.1037/per0000195.
10
A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry.应用计算精神病学发展路线图
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Sep;1(5):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.05.001.