Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 3;17(11):3971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113971.
Nudge interventions are widely used to promote health in schools, yet implementation metrics are seldom used to understand intervention outcomes. A multi-component intervention consisting of cafeteria decorations, creative names, social norming taste tests, and flavor station components was implemented in three rural elementary school cafeterias by school nutrition services (SNS) and extension staff. Selection and consumption of fruits and vegetables at lunch were measured through monthly plate waste assessments over eight months ( = 1255 trays). Interviews were conducted with SNS staff ( = 3) upon completion of the intervention to assess implementation outcomes using validated acceptability and feasibility metrics. Consumption findings were generally inconsistent across schools and time points, yet fruit consumption increased at School 1 ( < 0.05) during the taste test and flavor station intervention months and School 2 ( < 0.001) during the creative names intervention months compared to baseline. Odds of selecting a vegetable at School 3 were three times higher than baseline during the taste test intervention months (odds ratio (OR), 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-6.5). Cafeteria decorations and taste tests had higher reported implementation metrics for acceptability and feasibility than other interventions. Thematic analysis underscored the facilitating role of extension support, as well as systems factors, which served as facilitators and barriers across schools and interventions. These findings suggest that nudge interventions are a promising strategy to improve vegetable selection and fruit consumption in school meal programs.
推动干预措施被广泛用于促进学校健康,但很少使用实施指标来了解干预结果。一项由学校营养服务(SNS)和推广人员在三所农村小学餐厅实施的多组分干预措施,包括餐厅装饰、创意名称、社会规范品尝测试和风味站组件。通过每月的餐盘浪费评估( = 1255 个托盘),在 8 个月内测量午餐时水果和蔬菜的选择和消耗情况。干预完成后,与 SNS 工作人员( = 3)进行访谈,使用经过验证的可接受性和可行性指标评估实施结果。尽管各学校和时间点的消费结果不一致,但在品尝测试和风味站干预月份,学校 1 的水果消费增加( < 0.05),而在创意名称干预月份,学校 2 的水果消费增加( < 0.001),与基线相比。与基线相比,在品尝测试干预月份,学校 3 选择蔬菜的几率增加了两倍(优势比(OR),3.0;95%置信区间(CI),1.3-6.5)。餐厅装饰和品尝测试的可接受性和可行性报告实施指标较高,而其他干预措施的报告实施指标较低。主题分析强调了推广支持的促进作用,以及系统因素,这些因素在各学校和干预措施中起到了促进和障碍的作用。这些发现表明,推动干预措施是改善学校膳食计划中蔬菜选择和水果消费的一种有前途的策略。