Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jun 19;12(6):405. doi: 10.3390/toxins12060405.
Ruminal microbiota of cattle are not able to detoxify all mycotoxins. In addition, detoxification can be hampered by adverse ruminal conditions (e.g., low ruminal pH). Hence, in the cattle husbandry, mycotoxin binders and modifiers could be used to prevent animal exposure to mycotoxins. In this study, an in vitro rumen model, including feed matrix, was established as first screening tool to test the efficacy of five products claiming to detoxify mycotoxins. The detoxifiers had different modes of action: (a) binding (three products); (b) enzymatic detoxification of zearalenone (ZEN; one product, ZenA); and (c) bacterial transformation of trichothecenes (one product, BBSH 797). For the mycotoxin binders, the binding to the mycotoxins enniatin B (ENN B), roquefortine C (ROQ-C), mycophenolic acid (MPA), deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol (NIV), and zearalenone (ZEN) were tested at a dose recommended by the manufacturers. The in vitro model demonstrated that all binders adsorbed ENN B to a certain extent, while only one of the binders also partially adsorbed ROQ-C. The binders did not change the concentrations of the other mycotoxins in the ruminal fluid. The enzyme ZenA detoxified ZEN very quickly and prevented the formation of the more toxic metabolite α-zearalenol (α-ZEL), both at normal (6.8) and low ruminal pH (5.8). The addition of BBSH 797 enhanced detoxification of DON and NIV, both at normal and low ruminal pH. The in vitro rumen model demonstrated that the addition of ZenA seems to be a very promising strategy to prevent estrogenic effects of ZEN contaminated feed, and BBSH 797 is efficient in the detoxification of trichothecenes.
牛瘤胃微生物群无法解毒所有霉菌毒素。此外,解毒作用可能会受到瘤胃条件不利(例如,低瘤胃 pH)的阻碍。因此,在畜牧业中,可以使用霉菌毒素结合剂和修饰剂来防止动物接触霉菌毒素。在这项研究中,建立了一个包含饲料基质的体外瘤胃模型,作为首先筛选工具,以测试五种声称可解毒霉菌毒素的产品的功效。这些解毒剂具有不同的作用方式:(a)结合(三种产品);(b)玉米赤霉烯酮(ZEN;一种产品,Zena)的酶解毒;和(c)三萜烯的细菌转化(一种产品,BBSH 797)。对于霉菌毒素结合剂,在制造商建议的剂量下,对其与恩镰孢菌素 B(ENN B)、洛克福毒素 C(ROQ-C)、麦角酸(MPA)、脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(DON)、雪腐镰刀菌烯醇(NIV)和玉米赤霉烯酮(ZEN)的结合进行了测试。体外模型表明,所有结合剂都在一定程度上吸附了 ENN B,而只有一种结合剂还部分吸附了 ROQ-C。结合剂没有改变瘤胃液中其他霉菌毒素的浓度。ZenA 酶迅速解毒 ZEN,并防止了更有毒的代谢物α-玉米赤霉烯醇(α-ZEL)的形成,在正常(6.8)和低瘤胃 pH(5.8)下都是如此。添加 BBSH 797 增强了 DON 和 NIV 的解毒作用,在正常和低瘤胃 pH 下都是如此。体外瘤胃模型表明,添加 ZenA 似乎是防止 ZEN 污染饲料产生雌激素作用的非常有前途的策略,而 BBSH 797 对三萜烯的解毒非常有效。