Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, and Detroit, MI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Biomedical Research Center, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, and Detroit, MI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI; Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Florida International University, Miami, FL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;223(1):114.e1-114.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.043.
Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (PPROM) is frequently complicated by intraamniotic inflammatory processes such as intraamniotic infection and sterile intraamniotic inflammation. Antibiotic therapy is recommended to patients with PPROM to prolong the interval between this complication and delivery (latency period), reduce the risk of clinical chorioamnionitis, and improve neonatal outcome. However, there is a lack of information regarding whether the administration of antibiotics can reduce the intensity of the intraamniotic inflammatory response or eradicate microorganisms in patients with PPROM.
The first aim of the study was to determine whether antimicrobial agents can reduce the magnitude of the intraamniotic inflammatory response in patients with PPROM by assessing the concentrations of interleukin-6 in amniotic fluid before and after antibiotic treatment. The second aim was to determine whether treatment with intravenous clarithromycin changes the microbial load of Ureaplasma spp DNA in amniotic fluid.
A retrospective cohort study included patients who had (1) a singleton gestation, (2) PPROM between 24+0 and 33+6 weeks, (3) a transabdominal amniocentesis at the time of admission, and (4) intravenous antibiotic treatment (clarithromycin for patients with intraamniotic inflammation and benzylpenicillin/clindamycin in the cases of allergy in patients without intraamniotic inflammation) for 7 days. Follow-up amniocenteses (7 day after admission) were performed in the subset of patients with a latency period lasting longer than 7 days. Concentrations of interleukin-6 were measured in the samples of amniotic fluid with a bedside test, and the presence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was assessed with culture and molecular microbiological methods. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as a bedside interleukin-6 concentration ≥745 pg/mL in the samples of amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic infection was defined as the presence of both microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intraamniotic inflammation; sterile intraamniotic inflammation was defined as the presence of intraamniotic inflammation without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity.
A total of 270 patients with PPROM were included in this study: 207 patients delivered within 7 days and 63 patients delivered after 7 days of admission. Of the 63 patients who delivered after 7 days following the initial amniocentesis, 40 underwent a follow-up amniocentesis. Patients with intraamniotic infection (n = 7) and sterile intraamniotic inflammation (n = 7) were treated with intravenous clarithromycin. Patients without either microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity or intraamniotic inflammation (n = 26) were treated with benzylpenicillin or clindamycin. Treatment with clarithromycin decreased the interleukin-6 concentration in amniotic fluid at the follow-up amniocentesis compared to the initial amniocentesis in patients with intraamniotic infection (follow-up: median, 295 pg/mL, interquartile range [IQR], 72-673 vs initial: median, 2973 pg/mL, IQR, 1750-6296; P = .02) and in those with sterile intraamniotic inflammation (follow-up: median, 221 pg/mL, IQR 118-366 pg/mL vs initial: median, 1446 pg/mL, IQR, 1300-2941; P = .02). Samples of amniotic fluid with Ureaplasma spp DNA had a lower microbial load at the time of follow-up amniocentesis compared to the initial amniocentesis (follow-up: median, 1.8 × 10 copies DNA/mL, 2.9 × 10 to 6.7 × 10 vs initial: median, 4.7 × 10 copies DNA/mL, interquartile range, 2.9 × 10 to 3.6 × 10; P = .03).
Intravenous therapy with clarithromycin was associated with a reduction in the intensity of the intraamniotic inflammatory response in patients with PPROM with either intraamniotic infection or sterile intraamniotic inflammation. Moreover, treatment with clarithromycin was related to a reduction in the load of Ureaplasma spp DNA in the amniotic fluid of patients with PPROM <34 weeks of gestation.
早产胎膜早破(PPROM)常并发羊膜腔内炎症过程,如羊膜腔内感染和无菌性羊膜腔炎症。推荐对有 PPROM 的患者使用抗生素治疗,以延长该并发症与分娩之间的潜伏期,降低临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险,并改善新生儿结局。然而,关于抗生素治疗是否可以降低 PPROM 患者羊膜腔内炎症反应的强度或消除微生物,信息仍然缺乏。
本研究的首要目的是通过评估抗生素治疗前后羊水中白细胞介素-6 的浓度,确定抗菌药物是否可以降低 PPROM 患者羊膜腔内炎症反应的程度。第二个目的是确定静脉滴注克拉霉素是否改变 Ureaplasma spp DNA 在羊水的微生物负荷。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了以下患者:(1)单胎妊娠;(2)妊娠 24+0 至 33+6 周的胎膜早破;(3)入院时行经腹羊膜穿刺术;(4)静脉用抗生素治疗(羊膜腔内炎症患者用克拉霉素,羊膜腔内炎症患者无过敏者用苄星青霉素/克林霉素)7 天。在潜伏期超过 7 天的患者亚组中进行了后续羊膜穿刺术。使用床边检测测量羊水样本中的白细胞介素-6 浓度,并通过培养和分子微生物学方法评估羊膜腔微生物入侵情况。羊膜腔内炎症定义为羊水样本中白细胞介素-6 浓度≥745 pg/mL。羊膜腔内感染定义为羊膜腔微生物入侵和羊膜腔内炎症同时存在;无菌性羊膜腔内炎症定义为存在羊膜腔内炎症而无羊膜腔微生物入侵。
本研究共纳入 270 例有 PPROM 的患者:207 例在 7 天内分娩,63 例在入院后 7 天分娩。在初始羊膜穿刺术后 7 天进行后续羊膜穿刺术的 63 例患者中,40 例进行了后续羊膜穿刺术。羊膜腔内感染(n=7)和无菌性羊膜腔内炎症(n=7)患者接受了静脉克拉霉素治疗。无羊膜腔微生物入侵或羊膜腔内炎症的患者(n=26)接受了苄星青霉素或克林霉素治疗。与初始羊膜穿刺术相比,羊膜腔内感染(随访:中位数 295 pg/mL,四分位距 72-673 与初始:中位数 2973 pg/mL,四分位距 1750-6296;P=0.02)和无菌性羊膜腔内炎症(随访:中位数 221 pg/mL,四分位距 118-366 pg/mL 与初始:中位数 1446 pg/mL,四分位距 1300-2941;P=0.02)患者的克拉霉素治疗降低了羊水中白细胞介素-6 的浓度。与初始羊膜穿刺术相比,随访时 Ureaplasma spp DNA 样本的微生物负荷降低(随访:中位数 1.8×10 拷贝 DNA/mL,2.9×10 至 6.7×10 与初始:中位数 4.7×10 拷贝 DNA/mL,四分位距 2.9×10 至 3.6×10;P=0.03)。
对于有 PPROM 伴羊膜腔内感染或无菌性羊膜腔内炎症的患者,静脉滴注克拉霉素治疗与减轻羊膜腔内炎症反应的强度有关。此外,克拉霉素治疗与降低妊娠<34 周胎膜早破患者羊水中 Ureaplasma spp DNA 的负荷有关。