McAdams Harrison, Kaiser Eric A, Igdalova Aleksandra, Haggerty Edda B, Cucchiara Brett, Brainard David H, Aguirre Geoffrey K
Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):17320-17329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007402117. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
Second only to headache, photophobia is the most debilitating symptom reported by people with migraine. While the melanopsin-containing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) are thought to play a role, how cone and melanopsin signals are integrated in this pathway to produce visual discomfort is poorly understood. We studied 60 people: 20 without headache and 20 each with interictal photophobia from migraine with or without visual aura. Participants viewed pulses of spectral change that selectively targeted melanopsin, the cones, or both and rated the degree of visual discomfort produced by these stimuli while we recorded pupil responses. We examined the data within a model that describes how cone and melanopsin signals are weighted and combined at the level of the retina and how this combined signal is transformed into a rating of discomfort or pupil response. Our results indicate that people with migraine do not differ from headache-free controls in the manner in which melanopsin and cone signals are combined. Instead, people with migraine demonstrate an enhanced response to integrated ipRGC signals for discomfort. This effect of migraine is selective for ratings of visual discomfort, in that an enhancement of pupil responses was not seen in the migraine group, nor were group differences found in surveys of other behaviors putatively linked to ipRGC function (chronotype, seasonal sensitivity, presence of a photic sneeze reflex). By revealing a dissociation in the amplification of discomfort vs. pupil response, our findings suggest a postretinal alteration in processing of ipRGC signals for photophobia in migraine.
畏光仅次于头痛,是偏头痛患者报告的最使人衰弱的症状。虽然含黑视蛋白的内在光敏视网膜神经节细胞(ipRGCs)被认为发挥了作用,但锥体和黑视蛋白信号如何在这条通路中整合以产生视觉不适却知之甚少。我们研究了60人:20名无头痛者以及20名分别患有发作间期偏头痛性畏光且伴有或不伴有视觉先兆的患者。参与者观看选择性针对黑视蛋白、锥体或两者的光谱变化脉冲,并在我们记录瞳孔反应时对这些刺激产生的视觉不适程度进行评分。我们在一个模型中检查了数据,该模型描述了锥体和黑视蛋白信号如何在视网膜水平加权和组合,以及这个组合信号如何转化为不适评分或瞳孔反应。我们的结果表明,偏头痛患者在黑视蛋白和锥体信号的组合方式上与无头痛对照组没有差异。相反,偏头痛患者对整合的ipRGC信号产生不适的反应增强。偏头痛的这种效应在视觉不适评分方面具有选择性,因为在偏头痛组中未观察到瞳孔反应增强,在对其他假定与ipRGC功能相关的行为(昼夜节律类型、季节敏感性、光喷嚏反射的存在)的调查中也未发现组间差异。通过揭示不适放大与瞳孔反应之间的分离,我们的研究结果表明偏头痛患者畏光时ipRGC信号处理存在视网膜后改变。