• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

主观可能性与未来事件的构建水平:对 Wakslak、Trope、Liberman 和 Alony(2006)的研究的复制。

Subjective likelihood and the construal level of future events: A replication study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006).

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):e27-e37. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000214. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

DOI:10.1037/pspa0000214
PMID:32673044
Abstract

C. J. Wakslak, Y. Trope, N. Liberman, and R. Alony (2006) examined the effect of manipulating the likelihood of future events on level of construal (i.e., mental abstraction). Over 7 experiments, they consistently found that subjectively unlikely (vs. likely) future events were more abstractly (vs. concretely) construed. This well-cited, but understudied finding has had a major influence on the construal level theory (CLT) literature: Likelihood is considered to be 1 of 4 psychological distances assumed to influence mental abstraction in similar ways (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Contrary to the original empirical findings, we present 2 close replication attempts ( = 115 and = 120; the original studies had = 20 and = 34) that failed to find the effect of likelihood on construal level. Bayesian analyses provided diagnostic support for the absence of an effect. In light of the failed replications, we present a meta-analytic summary of the accumulated evidence on the effect. It suggests a strong trend of declining effect sizes as a function of larger samples. These results call into question the previous conclusion that likelihood has a reliable influence on construal level. We discuss the implications of these findings for CLT and advise against treating likelihood as a psychological distance until further tests have established the relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

C. J. Wakslak、Y. Trope、N. Liberman 和 R. Alony(2006 年)研究了操纵未来事件可能性对构念水平(即心理抽象)的影响。在 7 项实验中,他们一致发现,主观上不太可能(相对于可能)的未来事件被更抽象地(相对于具体地)构建。这一被广泛引用但研究不足的发现对构念水平理论(CLT)文献产生了重大影响:可能性被认为是影响心理抽象的 4 种心理距离之一,其影响方式相似(Trope & Liberman,2010)。与最初的实证发现相反,我们提出了 2 项密切的复制尝试(=115 和=120;原始研究的样本量分别为=20 和=34),均未发现可能性对构念水平的影响。贝叶斯分析为不存在影响提供了诊断支持。鉴于复制失败,我们对关于该效应的累积证据进行了元分析总结。它表明,随着样本量的增加,效应大小呈下降趋势。这些结果对可能性对构念水平有可靠影响的先前结论提出了质疑。我们讨论了这些发现对 CLT 的影响,并建议在进一步的测试确定这种关系之前,不要将可能性视为一种心理距离。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Subjective likelihood and the construal level of future events: A replication study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006).主观可能性与未来事件的构建水平:对 Wakslak、Trope、Liberman 和 Alony(2006)的研究的复制。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):e27-e37. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000214. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Politeness and psychological distance: a construal level perspective.礼貌与心理距离:构念水平视角。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Feb;98(2):268-80. doi: 10.1037/a0016960.
3
The association between psychological distance and construal level: evidence from an implicit association test.心理距离与解释水平之间的关联:来自内隐联想测验的证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):609-22. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609.
4
Power differences in the construal of a crisis: the immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001.权力差异在危机解读中的体现:2001 年 9 月 11 日事件的余波。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;36(3):354-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167209360418.
5
Beliefs about abstraction: Low-level and high-level construal signal different lay theories.关于抽象的信念:低水平和高水平的构建暗示了不同的浅层理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 May;152(5):1351-1367. doi: 10.1037/xge0001332. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance.时间视角和解释水平对社会距离的影响。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2011 Mar 1;47(2):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.001.
7
The effect of psychological distance on perceptual level of construal.心理距离对构建感知水平的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;33(7):1330-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01061.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
8
Mental traveling along psychological distances: The effects of cultural syndromes, perspective flexibility, and construal level.沿着心理距离的心理游历:文化综合征、视角灵活性和解释水平的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul;111(1):17-33. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000048.
9
Do True and False Intentions Differ in Level of Abstraction? A Test of Construal Level Theory in Deception Contexts.真实意图与虚假意图在抽象程度上有差异吗?欺骗情境下的解释水平理论检验。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 21;8:2037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02037. eCollection 2017.
10
The level of construal involved in the elicitation of core versus moral disgust.诱发核心情绪与道德情绪时涉及的解释水平。
Emotion. 2021 Mar;21(2):391-404. doi: 10.1037/emo0000709. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal relevance affects the perceived immorality of politically-charged threats.个人相关性会影响人们对带有政治色彩的威胁的感知不道德程度。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 29;18(12):e0296177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296177. eCollection 2023.