Suppr超能文献

主观可能性与未来事件的构建水平:对 Wakslak、Trope、Liberman 和 Alony(2006)的研究的复制。

Subjective likelihood and the construal level of future events: A replication study of Wakslak, Trope, Liberman, and Alony (2006).

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Nov;119(5):e27-e37. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000214. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Abstract

C. J. Wakslak, Y. Trope, N. Liberman, and R. Alony (2006) examined the effect of manipulating the likelihood of future events on level of construal (i.e., mental abstraction). Over 7 experiments, they consistently found that subjectively unlikely (vs. likely) future events were more abstractly (vs. concretely) construed. This well-cited, but understudied finding has had a major influence on the construal level theory (CLT) literature: Likelihood is considered to be 1 of 4 psychological distances assumed to influence mental abstraction in similar ways (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Contrary to the original empirical findings, we present 2 close replication attempts ( = 115 and = 120; the original studies had = 20 and = 34) that failed to find the effect of likelihood on construal level. Bayesian analyses provided diagnostic support for the absence of an effect. In light of the failed replications, we present a meta-analytic summary of the accumulated evidence on the effect. It suggests a strong trend of declining effect sizes as a function of larger samples. These results call into question the previous conclusion that likelihood has a reliable influence on construal level. We discuss the implications of these findings for CLT and advise against treating likelihood as a psychological distance until further tests have established the relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

C. J. Wakslak、Y. Trope、N. Liberman 和 R. Alony(2006 年)研究了操纵未来事件可能性对构念水平(即心理抽象)的影响。在 7 项实验中,他们一致发现,主观上不太可能(相对于可能)的未来事件被更抽象地(相对于具体地)构建。这一被广泛引用但研究不足的发现对构念水平理论(CLT)文献产生了重大影响:可能性被认为是影响心理抽象的 4 种心理距离之一,其影响方式相似(Trope & Liberman,2010)。与最初的实证发现相反,我们提出了 2 项密切的复制尝试(=115 和=120;原始研究的样本量分别为=20 和=34),均未发现可能性对构念水平的影响。贝叶斯分析为不存在影响提供了诊断支持。鉴于复制失败,我们对关于该效应的累积证据进行了元分析总结。它表明,随着样本量的增加,效应大小呈下降趋势。这些结果对可能性对构念水平有可靠影响的先前结论提出了质疑。我们讨论了这些发现对 CLT 的影响,并建议在进一步的测试确定这种关系之前,不要将可能性视为一种心理距离。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验