Lee Hogarth, School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Building, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK.
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield.
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Sep 15;394:112815. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112815. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
Behavioural economic theories of addiction contend that greater expected value of drug relative to alternative non-drug rewards is the core mechanism underpinning vulnerability to and recovery from addiction. To evaluate this claim, we exhaustively review studies with human drug users that have measured concurrent choice between drugs vs. alternative rewards, and explored individual differences. These studies show that drug choice can be modulated by drug cues, drug devaluation, imposition of costs/punishment and negative mood induction. Regarding individual differences, dependence severity was reliably associated with overall drug preference, and self-reported drug use to cope with negative affect was reliably associated with greater sensitivity to mood induced increases in drug choice. By contrast, there were no reliable individual differences in sensitivity to the effect of drug cues, drug devaluation or punishment on drug choice. These findings provide insight into the mechanisms that underpin vulnerability to dependence: vulnerability is conferred by greater relative value ascribed to drugs, and relative drug value is further augmented by negative affective states in those who report drug use coping motives. However, dependence does not appear to be characterised by abnormal cue-reactivity, habit learning or compulsion. We then briefly review emerging literature which demonstrates that therapeutic interventions and recovery from addiction might be attributed to changes in the expected relative value of drug versus alternative rewards. Finally, we outline a speculative computational account of the distortions in decision-making that precede action selection in addiction, and we explain how this account provides a blueprint for future research on the determinants of drug choice, and mechanisms of treatment and recovery from addiction. We conclude that a unified economic decision-making account of addiction has great promise in reconciling diverse addiction theories, and neuropsychological evaluation of the underlying decision mechanisms is a fruitful area for future research and treatment.
成瘾的行为经济学理论认为,相对于其他非药物奖励,药物的预期价值更高,这是易感性和成瘾恢复的核心机制。为了评估这一说法,我们详尽地回顾了有人类药物使用者参与的研究,这些研究测量了药物与其他奖励之间的同时选择,并探讨了个体差异。这些研究表明,药物选择可以通过药物线索、药物贬值、施加成本/惩罚和负面情绪诱导来调节。关于个体差异,依赖严重程度与整体药物偏好可靠相关,而报告药物使用来应对负面情绪与对情绪诱导的药物选择增加更敏感可靠相关。相比之下,对药物线索、药物贬值或惩罚对药物选择的影响的敏感性方面,并没有可靠的个体差异。这些发现为理解易感性的机制提供了线索:易感性归因于对药物赋予的相对更高价值,而那些报告有药物使用应对动机的人,其药物的相对价值会因负面情绪状态而进一步增加。然而,依赖似乎并不以异常的线索反应性、习惯学习或强迫为特征。然后,我们简要回顾了新兴文献,该文献表明治疗干预和成瘾恢复可能归因于药物与其他奖励的预期相对价值的变化。最后,我们概述了一个关于成瘾者在行动选择之前的决策扭曲的推测性计算模型,并解释了该模型如何为未来关于药物选择的决定因素以及成瘾治疗和恢复的机制的研究提供蓝图。我们得出的结论是,成瘾的统一经济决策模型有很大的希望来调和各种成瘾理论,对潜在决策机制的神经心理学评估是未来研究和治疗的一个富有成果的领域。