• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知识共享的乐趣:利他主义对隐性知识共享行为的影响。

The Enjoyment of Knowledge Sharing: Impact of Altruism on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Behavior.

作者信息

Obrenovic Bojan, Jianguo Du, Tsoy Diana, Obrenovic Slobodan, Khan Muhammad Aamir Shafique, Anwar Farooq

机构信息

School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.

School of Media and Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1496. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01496. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01496
PMID:32765348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7378797/
Abstract

Knowledge sharing between individuals is a key process for knowledge-intensive organizations to create value and gain a competitive edge. An individual is in the center of a complex set of factors, which are conducive to the knowledge-sharing process. The purpose of this empirical study is to explain the interaction mechanisms between personality and knowledge-sharing behavior and to examine the mediating effects of willingness to share knowledge and subjective norm. The theory of planned behavior, the social exchange theory, and the big five personality traits theory are combined to explain tacit knowledge-sharing behavior. A survey strategy and purposive sampling was applied, and the analysis was conducted on a sample of 288 employees from Croatia working on knowledge-intensive tasks for which high levels of tacit knowledge sharing are characteristic. A standard online questionnaire consisted of items evaluated on a 7-point Likert-scale, ranging from strongly agree (7) to strongly disagree (1). In the structural model, relationships between altruism, willingness, subjective norm, and tacit knowledge sharing were tested. Confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation was performed by using SEM software AMOS version 23. The findings of the study suggest that altruism has a direct impact on tacit knowledge sharing, reaffirming a relationship with knowledge sharing but distinguishing between sharing of different types of knowledge, assessing tacit knowledge sharing as a construct separate from general knowledge sharing. Our findings suggest that willingness to share is a predictive factor of knowledge sharing behavior between employees, having both direct impact on tacit knowledge sharing and being a mediator between the trait of altruism and tacit knowledge sharing. The mediation test also indicates that altruism has an indirect influence on tacit knowledge sharing when subjective norm was a mediator. The findings suggest that personality traits relying on social capital, such as altruism, have more influence on tacit knowledge sharing compared to personality traits that have accentuated intrinsic components. The study contributes to the better understanding of factors stimulating knowledge-sharing behaviors and provides recommendations based on empirical evidence, which may later be applied in the development of knowledge-sharing leadership styles, employee hiring, and auxiliary initiatives.

摘要

个体之间的知识共享是知识密集型组织创造价值和获得竞争优势的关键过程。个体处于一系列复杂因素的中心,这些因素有利于知识共享过程。本实证研究的目的是解释个性与知识共享行为之间的相互作用机制,并检验知识共享意愿和主观规范的中介作用。将计划行为理论、社会交换理论和大五人格特质理论结合起来解释隐性知识共享行为。采用了调查策略和目的抽样法,对来自克罗地亚的288名从事知识密集型任务的员工样本进行了分析,这些任务具有高水平隐性知识共享的特点。一份标准的在线问卷由在7点李克特量表上评估的项目组成,从强烈同意(7)到强烈不同意(1)。在结构模型中,测试了利他主义、意愿、主观规范和隐性知识共享之间的关系。使用SEM软件AMOS 23版本进行了最大似然估计的验证性因素分析。研究结果表明,利他主义对隐性知识共享有直接影响,重申了与知识共享的关系,但区分了不同类型知识的共享,将隐性知识共享评估为与一般知识共享不同的结构。我们的研究结果表明,共享意愿是员工之间知识共享行为的一个预测因素,对隐性知识共享既有直接影响,又是利他主义特质与隐性知识共享之间的中介。中介测试还表明,当主观规范作为中介时,利他主义对隐性知识共享有间接影响。研究结果表明,与强调内在成分的人格特质相比,依赖社会资本的人格特质,如利他主义,对隐性知识共享的影响更大。该研究有助于更好地理解刺激知识共享行为的因素,并根据实证证据提供建议,这些建议随后可能应用于知识共享领导风格的发展、员工招聘和辅助举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/cfcfc35edee4/fpsyg-11-01496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/0bcf06177ce5/fpsyg-11-01496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/ae1dbc50ad2d/fpsyg-11-01496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/cfcfc35edee4/fpsyg-11-01496-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/0bcf06177ce5/fpsyg-11-01496-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/ae1dbc50ad2d/fpsyg-11-01496-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fcd/7378797/cfcfc35edee4/fpsyg-11-01496-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Enjoyment of Knowledge Sharing: Impact of Altruism on Tacit Knowledge-Sharing Behavior.知识共享的乐趣:利他主义对隐性知识共享行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 16;11:1496. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01496. eCollection 2020.
2
The Effect of Entrepreneurial Leadership on Employees' Tacit Knowledge Sharing in Start-Ups: A Moderated Mediation Model.创业领导力对初创企业员工隐性知识共享的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Jan 14;15:137-149. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S347523. eCollection 2022.
3
Psychological capital and breakthrough innovation: The role of tacit knowledge sharing and task interdependence.心理资本与突破性创新:隐性知识共享和任务相互依存的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 17;14:1097936. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097936. eCollection 2023.
4
Team innovation climate and knowledge sharing among healthcare managers: mediating effects of altruistic intentions.医疗保健管理者团队创新氛围与知识共享:利他意图的中介作用
Chang Gung Med J. 2012 Sep-Oct;35(5):408-19. doi: 10.4103/2319-4170.105477.
5
Entrepreneurial Leadership and Entrepreneurial Performance in Start-Ups: A Moderated Serial Mediation Model.初创企业中的创业领导力与创业绩效:一个有调节的串行中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:831555. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831555. eCollection 2022.
6
How to utilize tacit knowledge in health organizations: An Iranian perspective.如何在卫生组织中利用隐性知识:伊朗视角。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Nov 22;32:116. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.116. eCollection 2018.
7
Effects of Employee Well-Being and Self-Efficacy on the Relationship between Coaching Leadership and Knowledge Sharing Intention: A Study of UK and US Employees.员工幸福感和自我效能感对教练型领导与知识共享意愿关系的影响:对英、美员工的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010638.
8
Leader Humility and Knowledge Sharing Intention: A Serial Mediation Model.领导者谦逊与知识共享意愿:一个串行中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 8;11:560704. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560704. eCollection 2020.
9
How Does Information Sharing of a Supervisor Influence Proactive Change Behavior of an Employee? The Chain Mediating Role of Family-Like Employee-Organization Relationship and Relationship Energy.上级的信息共享如何影响员工的主动变革行为?类家庭式员工-组织关系和关系能量的链式中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 23;12:739968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739968. eCollection 2021.
10
Interpersonal Relationship, Knowledge Characteristic, and Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Online Community Members: A TAM Perspective.在线社区成员的人际关系、知识特征和知识共享行为:TAM 视角。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;2022:4188480. doi: 10.1155/2022/4188480. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors related to nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards pain management: a cross-sectional study of 32 tertiary hospitals in Anhui province, China.与护士疼痛管理知识和态度相关的因素:对中国安徽省32家三级医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e097514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097514.
2
Daily knowledge sharing at work: the role of daily knowledge sharing expectations, learning goal orientation and task interdependence.工作中的日常知识共享:日常知识共享期望、学习目标导向和任务相互依赖的作用。
Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2025 Jan 30;34(2):298-314. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2025.2458343. eCollection 2025.
3
Crucial role of craftsmanship spirit in fostering innovative behavior among skilled talents in the manufacturing sector.

本文引用的文献

1
Research altruism as motivation for participation in community-centered environmental health research.研究利他主义作为参与以社区为中心的环境健康研究的动机。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;196:175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.028. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
2
Crucial Dimensions of Human Altruism. Affective vs. Conceptual Factors Leading to Helping or Reinforcing Others.人类利他主义的关键维度。导致帮助或强化他人的情感因素与概念因素。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 13;7:519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00519. eCollection 2016.
3
Which Personality Attributes Are Most Important in the Workplace?
工匠精神在制造业技能人才创新行为培养中的关键作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1407426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1407426. eCollection 2024.
4
Investigating the linkage between knowledge sharing attitude, self-efficacy, and behavior in Bangladeshi information technology sector: Knowledge sharing intention as a mediator.探究孟加拉国信息技术行业知识共享态度、自我效能感与行为之间的联系:以知识共享意愿为中介变量
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 20;11(1):e41399. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41399. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
5
Primary health care team faultlines and team performance: the mediating role of knowledge sharing.初级卫生保健团队的断层线与团队绩效:知识共享的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1362520. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1362520. eCollection 2024.
6
Why do academicians share knowledge? A study of higher education institutions in India.院士为何分享知识?对印度高等教育机构的一项研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 1;14:1181030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181030. eCollection 2023.
7
Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy.在新兴经济体中,对 Z 世代劳动力“安静辞职”意向的组织条件的重要性进行建模。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 18;13(1):15438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3.
8
Does organizational justice facet matters in knowledge hiding?组织公正维度在知识隐藏中重要吗?
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 17;9(8):e18372. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18372. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Knowledge sharing behaviour among head nurses in online health communities: The moderating role of knowledge self-efficacy.护士长在在线健康社区中的知识共享行为:知识自我效能感的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 19;18(1):e0278721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278721. eCollection 2023.
10
The effect of audit team's emotional intelligence on reduced audit quality behavior in audit firms: Considering the mediating effect of team trust and the moderating effect of knowledge sharing.审计团队情商对审计公司审计质量行为降低的影响:考虑团队信任的中介作用和知识共享的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 13;13:1082889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082889. eCollection 2022.
职场中最重要的人格特质有哪些?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):538-51. doi: 10.1177/1745691614543972.
4
(Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management.(对)安全文化及其与安全管理的关系的误解。
Risk Anal. 2010 Oct;30(10):1466-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01452.x.
5
Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.信息共享与团队绩效:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Mar;94(2):535-46. doi: 10.1037/a0013773.
6
Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy.将利他主义回归利他主义:同理心的进化。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625.
7
Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective.积极主动型人格与工作绩效:社会资本视角
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):1011-7. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1011.
8
Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.领导者简报和团队互动培训对团队适应新环境的绩效影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Dec;85(6):971-86. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971.
9
Evaluation of a model of attention with confirmatory factor analysis.用验证性因素分析评估注意力模型。
Neuropsychology. 2000 Apr;14(2):201-208. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.14.2.201.
10
The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.归属的需求:对人际依恋的渴望是一种基本的人类动机。
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529.