• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓解干预措施和温度对美国30个大都市区新冠疫情期间瞬时再生数的影响。

Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas.

作者信息

Yu Xinhua

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, USA.

出版信息

One Health. 2020 Dec;10:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160. Epub 2020 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160
PMID:32864409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442557/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process.

METHODS

Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (R) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student tests were used to compare temperature and peak R cross-sectionally.

RESULTS

We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (R), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a R of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the Rs remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak R than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak.

摘要

背景

截至2020年8月10日,新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行已持续六个多月,全球死亡人数超过734,664人。本研究旨在评估缓解措施如何影响美国30个最大都市圈的疫情发展过程,以及温度在疫情发展过程中是否发挥了作用。

方法

在都市圈层面分析了公开可得的COVID-19病例和死亡时间序列数据以及天气数据。使用基于回顾性移动平均值的时变繁殖数(R)来探究趋势。采用学生检验对温度和R峰值进行横断面比较。

结果

我们发现,自3月底以来,所有地区以瞬时繁殖数(R)衡量的病毒传播力均有所下降,并且几乎所有地区在2020年4月15日之后R值都降至1或以下。主要下降时间与缓解措施的实施同步。然而,此后大多数地区的R值仍维持在1左右,一些地区出现了一些小幅度的短期反弹,这表明在措施放松时这些地区疫情持续存在。温度较高的城市其R峰值往往也低于温度较低的城市。然而,差异无统计学意义,且存在较大的地理差异。

结论

积极的干预措施可能减轻了当前COVID-19大流行,而温度可能对病毒传播影响较弱。我们可能需要为冠状病毒疫情的可能卷土重来做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/5a0625e081b4/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/2106e613455d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/c9278cb401b5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/2c2c3c128e4f/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/5a0625e081b4/fx2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/2106e613455d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/c9278cb401b5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/2c2c3c128e4f/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/385b/7582204/5a0625e081b4/fx2.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas.缓解干预措施和温度对美国30个大都市区新冠疫情期间瞬时再生数的影响。
One Health. 2020 Dec;10:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Dynamic Panel Data Modeling and Surveillance of COVID-19 in Metropolitan Areas in the United States: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.动态面板数据分析与美国大都市地区 COVID-19 的监测:纵向趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e26081. doi: 10.2196/26081.
4
Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature With the Instantaneous Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 in Counties Across the United States.社交距离、人口密度和温度与美国各县 SARS-CoV-2 瞬时繁殖数的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16099.
5
COVID-19 Surveillance Updates in US Metropolitan Areas: Dynamic Panel Data Modeling.美国大都市地区 COVID-19 监测更新:动态面板数据建模。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Feb 24;8(2):e28737. doi: 10.2196/28737.
6
Inverse correlation between average monthly high temperatures and COVID-19-related death rates in different geographical areas.不同地理区域的月平均高温与 COVID-19 相关死亡率呈反比关系。
J Transl Med. 2020 Jun 23;18(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02418-5.
7
COVID-19 pandemic dynamics in India, the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant, and implications for vaccination.印度的新冠疫情动态、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)德尔塔变异株及其对疫苗接种的影响
medRxiv. 2021 Nov 22:2021.06.21.21259268. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.21.21259268.
8
An assessment of transmission dynamics via time-varying reproduction number of the second wave of the COVID-19 epidemic in Fiji.通过随时间变化的繁殖数对斐济第二波新冠疫情传播动态的评估。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 31;9(8):220004. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220004. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Quantifying the effect of government interventions and virus mutations on transmission advantage during COVID-19 pandemic.量化 COVID-19 大流行期间政府干预和病毒突变对传播优势的影响。
J Infect Public Health. 2022 Mar;15(3):338-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.020. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
10
First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment.中国湖北省以外地区采取控制措施后第一波 COVID-19 的传染性和严重程度,以及第二波疫情情景规划:模型影响评估。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1382-1393. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30746-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the Effects of Climate Variables on COVID-19 Pandemic? A Systematic Review and Current Update.气候变量对新冠疫情有何影响?系统综述与最新进展
Adv Biomed Res. 2023 Feb 25;12:33. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_145_21. eCollection 2023.
2
Heatstroke-related ambulance dispatch risk before and during COVID-19 pandemic: Subgroup analysis by age, severity, and incident place.新冠疫情前后与热射病相关的救护车派遣风险:按年龄、严重程度和事件地点进行的亚组分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 15;821:153310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153310. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence That Higher Temperatures Are Associated With a Marginally Lower Incidence of COVID-19 Cases.有证据表明,较高的温度与 COVID-19 病例的发病率略有降低有关。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 10;8:367. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00367. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.非药物干预措施对 2019 年冠状病毒病和流感在香港的影响评估:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 - COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1-30, 2020.
非药物公共卫生干预措施对 COVID-19 的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260371. eCollection 2021.
4
Compliance with the main preventive measures of COVID-19 in Spain: The role of knowledge, attitudes, practices, and risk perception.西班牙对新冠疫情主要预防措施的遵守情况:知识、态度、行为及风险认知的作用
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Jul;69(4):e871-e882. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14364. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
5
Effective public health measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19: a systematic review.有效控制 COVID-19 传播的公共卫生措施:系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 29;21(1):1015. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11111-1.
6
Physical distancing implementation, ambient temperature and Covid-19 containment: An observational study in the United States.物理距离实施、环境温度与新冠病毒防控:美国的一项观察性研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147876. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876. Epub 2021 May 21.
7
Impact of meteorological parameters on COVID-19 transmission in Bangladesh: a spatiotemporal approach.气象参数对孟加拉国新冠病毒传播的影响:一种时空分析方法
Theor Appl Climatol. 2021;144(1-2):273-285. doi: 10.1007/s00704-021-03535-x. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
8
Health service inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic among elderly people living in large urban and non-urban areas in Florida, USA.美国佛罗里达州大城市和非城市地区老年人在新冠疫情期间的医疗服务不平等情况。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Nov 24;8:2050312120974168. doi: 10.1177/2050312120974168. eCollection 2020.
9
Modeling return of the epidemic: Impact of population structure, asymptomatic infection, case importation and personal contacts.建模疫情反弹:人口结构、无症状感染、病例输入和人际接触的影响。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020 Sep-Oct;37:101858. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101858. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2020 年 3 月 1 日至 30 日,14 个州住院的经实验室确诊的 2019 冠状病毒病患者的住院率和特征 - COVID-NET。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):458-464. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3.
4
Commentary on Ferguson, et al., "Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand".评 Ferguson 等人的“减少 COVID-19 死亡率和医疗需求的非药物干预(NPIs)的影响”一文。
Bull Math Biol. 2020 Apr 8;82(4):52. doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00726-x.
5
Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study.中国湖北省以外地区 2019 年冠状病毒病的流行病学和传播动态演变:描述性和建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):793-802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30230-9. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Asymptomatic and Human-to-Human Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a 2-Family Cluster, Xuzhou, China.中国徐州 2 户家庭聚集性疫情中 SARS-CoV-2 的无症状传播和人际传播。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1626-1628. doi: 10.3201/eid2607.200718. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
7
Serial Interval of COVID-19 among Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases.新型冠状病毒肺炎确诊病例的潜伏期。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;26(6):1341-1343. doi: 10.3201/eid2606.200357. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的潜伏期来自公开报告的确诊病例:估计和应用。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 5;172(9):577-582. doi: 10.7326/M20-0504. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections.新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染的连续间隔。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:284-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.060. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.旅行限制对 2019 年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情传播的影响。
Science. 2020 Apr 24;368(6489):395-400. doi: 10.1126/science.aba9757. Epub 2020 Mar 6.