Ionta Franciny-Querobim, Bassoto Marcela-de Azevedo-Garcia, Dos Santos Natália-Mello, Di Campli Fabiana, Honório Heitor-Marques, Cruvinel Thiago, Buzalaf Marilia-Afonso-Rabelo, Rios Daniela
DDS, PhD; Assistant Professor, Department of Odontology. University of Marília.
DDS, Graduate student, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health Bauru. Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo. Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jul 1;12(7):e638-e643. doi: 10.4317/jced.56857. eCollection 2020 Jul.
The aim was to evaluate whether aspartame regular mouthwash prior to erosive challenges with citric or hydrochloric acids would be able to prevent erosive enamel wear.
This randomized, single blind study was conducted with 3 crossover phases of 5 days. Polished bovine enamel blocks (n=252) were randomly divided among 6 groups/ 3 phases/ 21 volunteers. The groups under study were: aspartame solution (0.024% of aspartame in deionized water - experimental group), deionized water (negative-control) and stannous-containing solution (Elmex® Erosion Protection Dental Rinse; positive-control); subjected to erosion on citric acid or hydrochloric acid. Four times per day the volunteers rinsed the intraoral appliance with the respective solutions () prior to immersion of half of the appliance in 0.05M citric acid and the other half in 0.01M hydrochloric acid for 120 seconds (extraoral). The response variable was enamel loss by profilometry. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (<0.05).
No difference on enamel loss was found between aspartame solution and deionized water. Stannous-solution resulted in less enamel loss compared to deionized water. Hydrochloric acid resulted in higher enamel loss than citric acid.
In this model, aspartame was not able to prevent erosive tooth wear against citric or hydrochloric acids. Dental erosion, aspartame, stannous fluoride, citric acid, hydrochloric acid.
目的是评估在使用柠檬酸或盐酸进行侵蚀性挑战之前,阿斯巴甜常规漱口水是否能够预防牙釉质侵蚀性磨损。
本随机、单盲研究分3个交叉阶段进行,每个阶段持续5天。将抛光的牛牙釉质块(n = 252)随机分为6组/3个阶段/21名志愿者。研究的组包括:阿斯巴甜溶液(去离子水中含0.024%阿斯巴甜——实验组)、去离子水(阴性对照)和含锡溶液(Elmex®防侵蚀护齿漱口水;阳性对照);分别用柠檬酸或盐酸进行侵蚀。志愿者每天4次用相应溶液冲洗口腔矫治器,然后将矫治器的一半浸入0.05M柠檬酸中,另一半浸入0.01M盐酸中120秒(口外)。反应变量是通过轮廓测定法测量的牙釉质损失。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(<0.05)。
阿斯巴甜溶液和去离子水在牙釉质损失方面没有差异。与去离子水相比,含锡溶液导致的牙釉质损失更少。盐酸导致的牙釉质损失高于柠檬酸。
在该模型中,阿斯巴甜不能预防针对柠檬酸或盐酸的侵蚀性牙齿磨损。牙齿侵蚀、阿斯巴甜、氟化亚锡、柠檬酸、盐酸。