Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720961272. doi: 10.1177/2150132720961272.
The study aims to assess the quality of life (QOL) in newly diagnosed asthmatic children and their caregivers before and after treatment using mini pediatric asthma quality of life questionnaire (PAQLQ) and pediatric asthma caregivers quality of life questionnaire (PACQLQ) and to compare their quality of life with ACS (asthma clinical severity score).
This prospective study was done among 99 children and their caregivers, who were interviewed using mini PAQLQ and PACQLQ on 2 occasions: at the time of inclusion and 4 weeks after treatment. During their clinic visit, asthma clinical severity scoring was done, and children were treated according to GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma).
After 4 weeks of treatment, there was a significant change in all domains of mini PAQLQ ( < .001) and PACQLQ ( < .001). In children, the change in the emotional domain after treatment was minimal when compared to other domains. When ACS was compared with mini PAQLQ and PACQLQ, children with well-controlled asthma had a better quality of life than partially-controlled asthmatic children ( < .001) and there wasn't a significant change in the quality of life of the caregivers after treatment ( = .321).
During treatment, QOL of newly diagnosed asthmatic children and their caregivers showed significant improvement but children lagged in their emotional domain. Despite medical intervention, these children also require psychological support and counseling. Also, caregivers didn't perceive a change in their QOL when compared with ACS and it indicates that parent's and child health-related quality of life should be taken as independent dimensions.
本研究旨在使用迷你儿科哮喘生活质量问卷(PAQLQ)和儿科哮喘照顾者生活质量问卷(PACQLQ)评估新诊断哮喘儿童及其照顾者在治疗前后的生活质量,并与哮喘控制测试(ACS)进行比较。
本前瞻性研究纳入了 99 名儿童及其照顾者,在两次就诊时使用迷你 PAQLQ 和 PACQLQ 进行访谈:纳入时和治疗后 4 周。在就诊期间,进行哮喘临床严重程度评分,并根据 GINA(全球哮喘倡议)对儿童进行治疗。
治疗 4 周后,迷你 PAQLQ( < .001)和 PACQLQ( < .001)的所有领域均发生显著变化。与其他领域相比,治疗后儿童情绪领域的变化最小。与 ACS 相比,哮喘控制良好的儿童生活质量优于部分控制的哮喘儿童( < .001),治疗后照顾者的生活质量没有显著变化( = .321)。
在治疗期间,新诊断哮喘儿童及其照顾者的生活质量显著改善,但儿童在情绪领域落后。尽管进行了医学干预,但这些儿童还需要心理支持和咨询。此外,与 ACS 相比,照顾者并没有感觉到他们的生活质量发生了变化,这表明父母和儿童的健康相关生活质量应作为独立维度考虑。