Rosell® Institute for Microbiome and Probiotics, 6100 Royalmount Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H4P 2R2, Canada.
Lallemand Health Solutions, 19 Rue des Briquetiers, 31702 Blagnac, France.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 8;105:110142. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110142. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
Psychobiotics are considered among potential avenues for modulating the bidirectional communication between the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system, defined as the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA). Even though causality has not yet been established, intestinal dysbiosis has emerged as a hallmark of several diseases, including neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs). The fact that the microbiota and central nervous system are co-developing during the first years of life has provided a paradigm suggesting a potential role of psychobiotics for earlier interventions. Studies in animal models of early-life stress (ELS) have shown that they can counteract the pervasive effects of stress during this crucial developmental period, and rescue behavioral symptoms related to anxiety and depression later in life. In humans, evidence from clinical studies on the efficacy of psychobiotics at improving mental outcomes in most NPDs remain limited, except for major depressive disorder for which more studies are available. Consequently, the beneficial effect of psychobiotics on depression-related outcomes in adults are becoming clearer. While the specific mechanisms at play remain elusive, the effect of psychobiotics are generally considered to involve the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, intestinal permeability, and inflammation. It is anticipated that future clinical studies will explore the potential role of psychobiotics at mitigating the risk developing NPDs in vulnerable individuals or in the context of childhood adversity. However, such studies remain challenging at present in terms of design and target populations; the profound impact of stress on the proper development of the MGBA during the first year of life is becoming increasingly recognized, but the trajectories post-ELS in humans and the mechanisms by which stress affects the susceptibility to various NPDs are still ill-defined. As psychobiotics are likely to exert both shared and specific mechanisms, a better definition of target subpopulations would allow to tailor psychobiotics selection by aligning mechanistic properties with known pathophysiological mechanisms or risk factors. Here we review the available evidence from clinical and preclinical studies supporting a role for psychobiotics at ameliorating depression-related outcomes, highlighting the knowledge gaps and challenges associated with conducting longitudinal studies to address outstanding key questions in the field.
心理益生菌被认为是调节胃肠道和中枢神经系统之间双向通讯的潜在途径之一,这种通讯被定义为微生物群-肠道-大脑轴(MGBA)。尽管因果关系尚未确立,但肠道菌群失调已成为多种疾病的标志,包括神经精神疾病(NPD)。事实上,在生命的头几年中,微生物群和中枢神经系统是共同发育的,这为心理益生菌可能在早期干预中发挥作用提供了一个范例。在生命早期应激(ELS)的动物模型研究中,已经表明它们可以抵消这个关键发育时期普遍存在的应激影响,并在以后的生活中挽救与焦虑和抑郁相关的行为症状。在人类中,关于心理益生菌在改善大多数 NPD 患者精神结局方面的临床研究证据仍然有限,除了有更多研究的重度抑郁症。因此,心理益生菌对成年人与抑郁相关结局的有益影响变得更加清晰。虽然作用的确切机制仍难以捉摸,但心理益生菌的作用通常被认为涉及下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴、肠道通透性和炎症。预计未来的临床研究将探索心理益生菌在减轻易患 NPD 个体或在儿童逆境背景下发展 NPD 风险方面的潜在作用。然而,目前这些研究在设计和目标人群方面仍然具有挑战性;应激对 MGBA 在生命第一年的正常发育的深远影响正越来越受到认识,但人类 ELS 后的轨迹以及应激影响各种 NPD 易感性的机制仍未明确定义。由于心理益生菌可能发挥共同和特定的机制,因此更好地定义目标亚人群将通过将机制特性与已知的病理生理机制或风险因素相匹配,允许通过调整心理益生菌的选择来调整其机制特性。在这里,我们回顾了支持心理益生菌在改善与抑郁相关结局方面作用的临床和临床前研究的现有证据,强调了开展纵向研究以解决该领域未解决的关键问题所面临的知识差距和挑战。