Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Neurosciences, Physiology and Psychology, Physical Activity, Health and Learning (LINP2-2APS), UFR STAPS, UPL, Paris Nanterre University, Nanterre, France.
Physical Activity, Sport and Health, UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244191. eCollection 2020.
The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of time of day (TD) on two types of exercise protocols [continuous (CP) versus alternated (AP)]. Eleven physical education students (mean ± SD: age = 24.4 ± 1.2 years, aerobic peak power (APP) = 290 ± 31.9 W) underwent four sessions. These sessions were performed at 08:00 (AM) and 18:00 (PM) and consisted of cycling exercises until voluntary exhaustion at 90% APP (CP) or 70%-105% APP (AP) with the order of testing randomly assigned. Time to exhaustion (time limit = Tlim) was measured from the start of the test to when voluntary exhaustion occurred. Heart rate (HR) was recorded at baseline (HRbaseline) and throughout the protocols to determine HR at exhaustion (HRpeak). Blood lactate ([La]) was measured at rest, immediately after exhaustion and at 2min30 post-exercise to determine [La]peak. A significantly higher means of Tlim (334 ± 57 s; 272 ± 59 s; p< 0.05), HRbaseline (72 ± 5 beats/min; 67 ± 5 beats/min; p< 0.01), HRpeak (186 ± 8 beats/min; 178 ± 9 beats/min; p< 0.01) and [La]peak (16.2 ± 2.1 mmol/l; 13.9 ± 1.9 mmol/l; p< 0.05) were observed in CP at the PM compared to the AM. In addition, a significant higher means of Tlim (380 ± 54 s; 312 ± 82 s; p< 0.05), HRbaseline (73.1 ± 5.5 beats/min; 67 ± 5.4 beats/min; p< 0.01), HRpeak (186 ± 8 beats/min; 180 ± 9 beats/min; p< 0.05) and [La]peak (17.9 ± 1.8 mmol/l; 14.7 ± 2.1 mmol/l; p< 0.01) were observed in AP at the PM compared to the AM. It is concluded that AP and CP are more appropriate in the late afternoon than in the morning for performing long-lasting exercises. The AP could be a novel strategy for increasing the engagement in physical activity.
本研究旨在探讨时间(TD)对两种运动方案[连续(CP)与交替(AP)]的影响。11 名体育专业学生(平均±标准差:年龄=24.4±1.2 岁,有氧峰值功率(APP)=290±31.9 W)进行了四次试验。这些试验分别在上午 8 点(AM)和下午 6 点(PM)进行,在 90%APP(CP)或 70%-105%APP(AP)下进行循环运动,直至自愿衰竭,测试顺序随机分配。至自愿衰竭的时间(时间限制= Tlim)从测试开始到自愿衰竭发生时测量。心率(HR)在基线(HRbaseline)和整个方案中记录,以确定衰竭时的 HR(HRpeak)。在休息时、衰竭后立即和运动后 2 分 30 秒测量血乳酸([La])以确定[La]峰值。CP 在下午的 Tlim(334±57 s;272±59 s;p<0.05)、HRbaseline(72±5 次/分钟;67±5 次/分钟;p<0.01)、HRpeak(186±8 次/分钟;178±9 次/分钟;p<0.01)和[La]peak(16.2±2.1 mmol/L;13.9±1.9 mmol/L;p<0.05)的平均值显著更高。此外,AP 在下午的 Tlim(380±54 s;312±82 s;p<0.05)、HRbaseline(73.1±5.5 次/分钟;67±5.4 次/分钟;p<0.01)、HRpeak(186±8 次/分钟;180±9 次/分钟;p<0.05)和[La]peak(17.9±1.8 mmol/L;14.7±2.1 mmol/L;p<0.01)的平均值显著更高。因此,CP 和 AP 在下午比上午更适合进行长时间的运动。AP 可能是增加身体活动参与度的新策略。