University of Minnesota.
New York University.
Child Dev. 2021 Jul;92(4):e457-e475. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13504. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Income, education, and cumulative-risk indices likely obscure meaningful heterogeneity in the mechanisms through which poverty impacts child outcomes. This study draws from contemporary theory to specify multiple dimensions of poverty-related adversity and resources, with the aim of better capturing these nuances. Using data from the Family Life Project (N = 1,292), we leveraged moderated nonlinear factor analysis (Bauer, 2017) to establish group- and longitudinally invariant environmental measures from infancy to early adolescence. Results indicated three latent factors-material deprivation, psychosocial threat, and sociocognitive resources-were distinct from each other and from family income. Each was largely invariant across site, racial group, and development and showed convergent and discriminant relations with age-twelve criterion measures. Implications for ensuring socioculturally valid measurements of poverty are discussed.
收入、教育和累积风险指数可能掩盖了贫困影响儿童发展结果的机制中的有意义的异质性。本研究借鉴当代理论,具体说明了与贫困相关的逆境和资源的多个维度,旨在更好地捕捉这些细微差别。本研究使用家庭生活项目的数据(N=1292),利用调节非线性因子分析(Bauer,2017),从婴儿期到青少年早期建立了群体和纵向不变的环境测量。结果表明,三个潜在因素——物质剥夺、心理社会威胁和社会认知资源——彼此不同,也与家庭收入不同。每个因素在不同地点、不同种族群体和发展阶段都基本保持不变,与 12 岁的标准测量值具有收敛和区别关系。讨论了确保对贫困进行社会文化上有效的测量的意义。