• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的对照实验评估数字接触者追踪的流行病学影响。

A population-based controlled experiment assessing the epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing.

机构信息

Member, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), Barcelona, Spain.

Secretaría de Estado de Digitalización e Inteligencia Artificial (SEDIA), Secretaría General de Administración Digital, Ministerio de Asuntos Económicos y Transformación Digital, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20817-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-20817-6
PMID:33500407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7838392/
Abstract

While Digital contact tracing (DCT) has been argued to be a valuable complement to manual tracing in the containment of COVID-19, no empirical evidence of its effectiveness is available to date. Here, we report the results of a 4-week population-based controlled experiment that took place in La Gomera (Canary Islands, Spain) between June and July 2020, where we assessed the epidemiological impact of the Spanish DCT app Radar Covid. After a substantial communication campaign, we estimate that at least 33% of the population adopted the technology and further showed relatively high adherence and compliance as well as a quick turnaround time. The app detects about 6.3 close-contacts per primary simulated infection, a significant percentage being contacts with strangers, although the spontaneous follow-up rate of these notified cases is low. Overall, these results provide experimental evidence of the potential usefulness of DCT during an epidemic outbreak in a real population.

摘要

虽然数字接触者追踪(DCT)被认为是控制 COVID-19 中人工追踪的有价值的补充手段,但目前尚无其有效性的经验证据。在这里,我们报告了 2020 年 6 月至 7 月在加那利群岛拉戈梅拉(西班牙)进行的为期 4 周的基于人群的对照实验的结果,我们评估了西班牙 DCT 应用程序 Radar Covid 的流行病学影响。在一次大规模的宣传活动之后,我们估计至少有 33%的人口采用了这项技术,并且还表现出相对较高的坚持性和合规性,以及快速的反应时间。该应用程序每例主要模拟感染检测到约 6.3 名密切接触者,其中很大一部分是与陌生人的接触者,尽管这些被通知病例的自发随访率较低。总的来说,这些结果为在真实人群中爆发疫情期间 DCT 的潜在有用性提供了实验证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a8/7838392/d21bb079ad92/41467_2020_20817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a8/7838392/d21bb079ad92/41467_2020_20817_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a8/7838392/d21bb079ad92/41467_2020_20817_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A population-based controlled experiment assessing the epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing.基于人群的对照实验评估数字接触者追踪的流行病学影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20817-6.
2
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
3
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Exposure Notification Cascade for Digital Contact Tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland.基于数据的瑞士苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 数字接触者追踪中暴露通知级联的仿真。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8184.
4
Sociodemographic characteristics determine download and use of a Corona contact tracing app in Germany-Results of the COSMO surveys.社会人口统计学特征决定了德国 Corona 接触者追踪应用程序的下载和使用情况——COSMO 调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256660. eCollection 2021.
5
Ethical Framework for Assessing Manual and Digital Contact Tracing for COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 人工和数字接触者追踪的伦理框架。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):395-400. doi: 10.7326/M20-5834. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:基于离散选择实验预测荷兰的使用率。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 9;8(10):e20741. doi: 10.2196/20741.
7
Public attitudes towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps: A UK-based focus group study.公众对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的态度:基于英国的焦点小组研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/hex.13179. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Peer-to-Peer Contact Tracing: Development of a Privacy-Preserving Smartphone App.点对点接触追踪:隐私保护智能手机应用程序的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 7;8(4):e18936. doi: 10.2196/18936.
9
Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.
10
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilayer networks describing urban interactions for building the digital twins of five cities in Spain.用于构建西班牙五个城市数字孪生体的描述城市互动的多层网络。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 15;12(1):1227. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05551-2.
2
Effectiveness modelling of digital contact-tracing solutions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic.用于应对新冠疫情的数字接触者追踪解决方案的有效性建模
J Navig. 2021 Apr 7:1-34. doi: 10.1017/S0373463321000175.
3
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。

本文引用的文献

1
A socio-technical framework for digital contact tracing.数字接触追踪的社会技术框架。
Results Eng. 2020 Dec;8:100163. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100163. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Anatomy of digital contact tracing: Role of age, transmission setting, adoption, and case detection.数字接触者追踪的解剖:年龄、传播环境、采用率和病例发现的作用。
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 9;7(15). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8750. Print 2021 Apr.
3
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.
4
Effectiveness of probabilistic contact tracing in epidemic containment: The role of superspreaders and transmission path reconstruction.概率性接触者追踪在疫情控制中的有效性:超级传播者的作用和传播路径重建
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 3;3(9):pgae377. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae377. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Modern technologies and solutions to enhance surveillance and response systems for emerging zoonotic diseases.用于加强新发人畜共患病监测和应对系统的现代技术与解决方案。
Sci One Health. 2023 Dec 12;3:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100061. eCollection 2024.
6
Population and contact tracer uptake of New Zealand's QR-code-based digital contact tracing app for COVID-19.新西兰基于 QR 码的 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪应用程序的人口和接触者追踪参与情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Apr 17;152:e66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000608.
7
Comparing Contact Tracing Through Bluetooth and GPS Surveillance Data: Simulation-Driven Approach.通过蓝牙和 GPS 监控数据进行接触者追踪比较:仿真驱动方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e38170. doi: 10.2196/38170.
8
Combatting SARS-CoV-2 With Digital Contact Tracing and Notification: Navigating Six Points of Failure.利用数字接触者追踪和通知来对抗 SARS-CoV-2:应对六个失败点。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Dec 4;9:e49560. doi: 10.2196/49560.
9
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.
10
Individual level analysis of digital proximity tracing for COVID-19 in Belgium highlights major bottlenecks.比利时对 COVID-19 的数字接触追踪的个体层面分析凸显出主要瓶颈。
Nat Commun. 2023 Oct 23;14(1):6717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42518-6.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
4
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19.自动化和部分自动化接触者追踪:一项系统评价以提供 COVID-19 控制信息。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Nov;2(11):e607-e621. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19.建模测试、接触者追踪和家庭隔离对 COVID-19 第二波疫情的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):964-971. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
Can digital contact tracing make up for lost time?数字接触者追踪能否弥补失去的时间?
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e417-e418. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30160-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
Preparation for Quarantine on the Cruise Ship Diamond Princess in Japan due to COVID-19.因 COVID-19 对停靠在日本的“钻石公主”号游轮进行隔离的准备工作。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 11;6(2):e18821. doi: 10.2196/18821.