de Silva Brian M, Higdon David M, Brunton Steven L, Kutz J Nathan
Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States.
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Apr 28;3:25. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00025. eCollection 2020.
Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification.
机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)算法如今正被用于仅从测量数据中自动发现物理原理和控制方程。然而,仅从数据中推断出通用物理定律具有挑战性,因为同时还需要提出一个伴随的差异模型,以解释理论与测量之间不可避免的不匹配。通过重新审视对不同大小和质量的落体进行建模的经典问题,我们强调了现代数据驱动的自动物理发现方法必须解决的一些细微问题。具体而言,我们表明测量噪声和复杂的次级物理机制,如不稳定的流体阻力,可能会掩盖引力的基本定律,从而导致错误的模型。我们使用非线性动力学的稀疏识别(SINDy)方法来识别实际测量数据和模拟轨迹的控制方程。将每个落体都受相似物理定律支配这一假设纳入SINDy方法,结果表明可以提高所学模型的稳健性,但由于阻力动力学中的微妙之处,预测值与观测值之间仍存在差异。这项工作凸显了这样一个事实:如果不做进一步修改,单纯应用ML/AI通常不足以推断出通用物理定律。