Hadique Sarah, Badami Varun, Forte Michael, Kovacic Nicole, Umer Amna, Shigle Amanda, Gardo Jordan, Sangani Rahul
Department of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Department of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Mar 19;3(3):e0371. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000371. eCollection 2021 Mar.
The recent conflicting data on the mortality benefit of neuromuscular blocking agents in acute respiratory distress syndrome and the potential adverse effects of continuous neuromuscular blocking agent necessitates that these medications should be used judiciously with dose reduction in mind. The aims of the study were to improve the process of care by provider education of neuromuscular blocking agent titration and monitoring and to determine the impact of clinical endpoint based neuromuscular blocking agent titration protocol.
We conducted a proof-of-concept historically controlled study of protocol-based intervention standardizing paralytic monitoring and titration using clinical variables. Education of the protocol was provided to ICU staff via bedside teaching and workshops. The primary outcomes were the time to reach goal paralysis and cumulative neuromuscular blocking agent dose. Secondary outcomes included maintenance of deeper sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale -5) prior to neuromuscular blocking agent initiation, total time on mechanical ventilation, length of stay, and mortality.
Medical ICU at a quaternary academic hospital between March 2019 and June 2020.
Adult severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (Pao/Fio <150) patients requiring neuromuscular blocking agent for greater than or equal to 12 hours. Eighty-two patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, 46 in the control group and 36 in the intervention group.
Education and implementation of standardized protocol.
Compared with the control group, the time to reach goal paralysis in the intervention group was shorter (8.55 ± 9.4 vs 2.63 ± 5.9 hr; < 0.0001) on significantly lower dose of cisatracurium (total dose 1,897.96 ± 1,241.0 vs 562.72 ± 546.7 mg; < 0.0001 and the rate 5.84 ± 2.66 vs 1.99 ± 0.95 µg/kg/min; < 0.0001). Deeper sedation was achieved at the time of initiation of neuromuscular blocking agent in the intervention arm (mean Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale -3.3 ± 1.9 vs -4.3 ± 1.7; = 0.015). There was no significant difference in total time on mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, and mortality between the two groups.
Implementation of comprehensive education, standardization of sedation prior to neuromuscular blocking agent initiation, integration of clinical variables in determining paralysis achievement, and proper use of peripheral nerve stimulation served as optimal strategies for the titration and monitoring of neuromuscular blocking agent in acute respiratory distress syndrome. This reduced drug utilization while continuing to achieve benefit without causing adverse effects.
近期关于急性呼吸窘迫综合征中神经肌肉阻滞剂的死亡率获益存在相互矛盾的数据,以及持续使用神经肌肉阻滞剂可能产生的不良反应,这使得在使用这些药物时应谨慎考虑剂量减少。本研究的目的是通过对医护人员进行神经肌肉阻滞剂滴定和监测的教育来改善护理过程,并确定基于临床终点的神经肌肉阻滞剂滴定方案的影响。
我们进行了一项基于历史对照的概念验证研究,采用基于方案的干预措施,使用临床变量对麻痹监测和滴定进行标准化。通过床边教学和研讨会向重症监护病房(ICU)工作人员提供该方案的教育。主要结局是达到目标麻痹的时间和神经肌肉阻滞剂的累积剂量。次要结局包括在开始使用神经肌肉阻滞剂之前维持更深程度的镇静(里士满躁动和镇静量表为-5)、机械通气总时间、住院时间和死亡率。
2019年3月至2020年6月期间一家四级学术医院的医学重症监护病房。
需要使用神经肌肉阻滞剂≥12小时的成年严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值<150)患者。82名患者符合纳入标准,对照组46例,干预组36例。
教育并实施标准化方案。
与对照组相比,干预组达到目标麻痹的时间更短(8.55±9.4 vs 2.63±5.9小时;P<0.0001),顺式阿曲库铵剂量显著更低(总剂量1897.96±1241.0 vs 562.72±546.7毫克;P<0.0001,速率5.84±2.66 vs 1.99±0.95微克/千克/分钟;P<0.0001)。干预组在开始使用神经肌肉阻滞剂时实现了更深程度的镇静(平均里士满躁动和镇静量表为-3.3±1.9 vs -4.3±1.7;P = 0.015)。两组在机械通气总时间、ICU住院时间、住院时间和死亡率方面无显著差异。
实施全面教育、在开始使用神经肌肉阻滞剂之前进行镇静标准化、在确定达到麻痹状态时整合临床变量以及正确使用外周神经刺激,是急性呼吸窘迫综合征中神经肌肉阻滞剂滴定和监测的最佳策略。这降低了药物使用率,同时在不产生不良反应的情况下持续获益。