• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SPIE-AAPM-NCI乳腺癌病理图像分析挑战赛:一项针对新辅助治疗后乳腺癌组织学图像中肿瘤细胞定量评估的图像分析挑战赛。

SPIE-AAPM-NCI BreastPathQ challenge: an image analysis challenge for quantitative tumor cellularity assessment in breast cancer histology images following neoadjuvant treatment.

作者信息

Petrick Nicholas, Akbar Shazia, Cha Kenny H, Nofech-Mozes Sharon, Sahiner Berkman, Gavrielides Marios A, Kalpathy-Cramer Jayashree, Drukker Karen, Martel Anne L

机构信息

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.

University of Toronto, Medical Biophysics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 May;8(3):034501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.034501. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.034501
PMID:33987451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8107263/
Abstract

: The breast pathology quantitative biomarkers (BreastPathQ) challenge was a grand challenge organized jointly by the International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The task of the BreastPathQ challenge was computerized estimation of tumor cellularity (TC) in breast cancer histology images following neoadjuvant treatment. : A total of 39 teams developed, validated, and tested their TC estimation algorithms during the challenge. The training, validation, and testing sets consisted of 2394, 185, and 1119 image patches originating from 63, 6, and 27 scanned pathology slides from 33, 4, and 18 patients, respectively. The summary performance metric used for comparing and ranking algorithms was the average prediction probability concordance (PK) using scores from two pathologists as the TC reference standard. : Test PK performance ranged from 0.497 to 0.941 across the 100 submitted algorithms. The submitted algorithms generally performed well in estimating TC, with high-performing algorithms obtaining comparable results to the average interrater PK of 0.927 from the two pathologists providing the reference TC scores. : The SPIE-AAPM-NCI BreastPathQ challenge was a success, indicating that artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms may be able to approach human performance for cellularity assessment and may have some utility in clinical practice for improving efficiency and reducing reader variability. The BreastPathQ challenge can be accessed on the Grand Challenge website.

摘要

乳腺病理定量生物标志物(BreastPathQ)挑战赛是由国际光学与光子学学会(SPIE)、美国医学物理学会(AAPM)、美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)联合举办的一项重大挑战赛。BreastPathQ挑战赛的任务是对新辅助治疗后的乳腺癌组织学图像中的肿瘤细胞密度(TC)进行计算机化估计。

共有39个团队在挑战赛期间开发、验证并测试了他们的TC估计算法。训练集、验证集和测试集分别由来自33名、4名和18名患者的63张、6张和27张扫描病理切片中的2394个、185个和1119个图像块组成。用于比较和排名算法的综合性能指标是使用两名病理学家的评分作为TC参考标准的平均预测概率一致性(PK)。

在提交的100种算法中,测试PK性能范围为0.497至0.941。提交的算法在估计TC方面总体表现良好,高性能算法获得的结果与提供参考TC评分的两名病理学家的平均评分者间PK 0.927相当。

SPIE - AAPM - NCI BreastPathQ挑战赛取得了成功,表明人工智能/机器学习算法在细胞密度评估方面可能能够接近人类表现,并且在临床实践中可能具有提高效率和减少阅片者差异的作用。可在重大挑战赛网站上访问BreastPathQ挑战赛。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/3f5d96652451/JMI-008-034501-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/50442f292416/JMI-008-034501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/8489af7d8019/JMI-008-034501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/83f737b04778/JMI-008-034501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/92651a4ebd18/JMI-008-034501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/0ea685181244/JMI-008-034501-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/a0a71221722a/JMI-008-034501-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/dbc1720cc99b/JMI-008-034501-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/3f5d96652451/JMI-008-034501-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/50442f292416/JMI-008-034501-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/8489af7d8019/JMI-008-034501-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/83f737b04778/JMI-008-034501-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/92651a4ebd18/JMI-008-034501-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/0ea685181244/JMI-008-034501-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/a0a71221722a/JMI-008-034501-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/dbc1720cc99b/JMI-008-034501-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bce1/8107263/3f5d96652451/JMI-008-034501-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
SPIE-AAPM-NCI BreastPathQ challenge: an image analysis challenge for quantitative tumor cellularity assessment in breast cancer histology images following neoadjuvant treatment.SPIE-AAPM-NCI乳腺癌病理图像分析挑战赛:一项针对新辅助治疗后乳腺癌组织学图像中肿瘤细胞定量评估的图像分析挑战赛。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 May;8(3):034501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.034501. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.用于检测乳腺癌女性患者淋巴结转移的深度学习算法的诊断评估
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2199-2210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585.
3
Morphological Estimation of Cellularity on Neo-Adjuvant Treated Breast Cancer Histological Images.新辅助治疗乳腺癌组织学图像中细胞密度的形态学评估
J Imaging. 2020 Sep 27;6(10):101. doi: 10.3390/jimaging6100101.
4
Automatic cellularity assessment from post-treated breast surgical specimens.从处理后的乳腺外科标本中进行自动细胞计数评估。
Cytometry A. 2017 Nov;91(11):1078-1087. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23244. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment.自动化和手动数字化切片肿瘤细胞计数用于肿瘤负担评估。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 1;9(1):14099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50568-4.
6
Ambiguity-aware breast tumor cellularity estimation via self-ensemble label distribution learning.通过自集成标签分布学习实现的模糊感知乳腺肿瘤细胞密度估计
Med Image Anal. 2023 Dec;90:102944. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102944. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
7
A collaborative workflow between pathologists and deep learning for the evaluation of tumour cellularity in lung adenocarcinoma.病理学家与深度学习在肺腺癌肿瘤细胞评估中的协作工作流程。
Histopathology. 2022 Dec;81(6):758-769. doi: 10.1111/his.14779. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
8
PAIP 2019: Liver cancer segmentation challenge.PAIP 2019:肝癌分割挑战赛。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Jan;67:101854. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101854. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
9
Direct Cellularity Estimation on Breast Cancer Histopathology Images Using Transfer Learning.基于迁移学习的乳腺癌组织病理学图像直接细胞计数。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2019 Jun 9;2019:3041250. doi: 10.1155/2019/3041250. eCollection 2019.
10
Report on the AAPM deep-learning spectral CT Grand Challenge.美国医学物理学家协会深度学习光谱CT重大挑战报告。
Med Phys. 2024 Feb;51(2):772-785. doi: 10.1002/mp.16363. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumour purity assessment with deep learning in colorectal cancer and impact on molecular analysis.利用深度学习评估结直肠癌肿瘤纯度及其对分子分析的影响
J Pathol. 2025 Feb;265(2):184-197. doi: 10.1002/path.6376. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
2
Cluster-based histopathology phenotype representation learning by self-supervised multi-class-token hierarchical ViT.基于聚类的组织病理学表型表示学习的自监督多类别标记层次化 ViT。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):3202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53361-0.
3
Biological insights and novel biomarker discovery through deep learning approaches in breast cancer histopathology.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Radiologist Assessment to Interpret Screening Mammograms.联合人工智能和放射科医生评估解读筛查性乳房 X 光照片的效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265.
2
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Nucleus segmentation across imaging experiments: the 2018 Data Science Bowl.
通过深度学习方法在乳腺癌组织病理学中获得生物学见解和发现新型生物标志物
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Apr 6;9(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00518-1.
4
Incorporating a Novel Dual Transfer Learning Approach for Medical Images.将一种新的双重迁移学习方法应用于医学图像。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 4;23(2):570. doi: 10.3390/s23020570.
5
Efficient Staining-Invariant Nuclei Segmentation Approach Using Self-Supervised Deep Contrastive Network.基于自监督深度对比网络的高效染色不变细胞核分割方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 2;12(12):3024. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123024.
6
Deep Learning of Histopathology Images at the Single Cell Level.单细胞水平的组织病理学图像深度学习
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Sep 10;4:754641. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.754641. eCollection 2021.
跨影像实验的核分割:2018 年数据科学竞赛
Nat Methods. 2019 Dec;16(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0612-7. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Translational AI and Deep Learning in Diagnostic Pathology.诊断病理学中的转化人工智能与深度学习
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Oct 1;6:185. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00185. eCollection 2019.
5
BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images.BACH:乳腺癌组织学图像的重大挑战。
Med Image Anal. 2019 Aug;56:122-139. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Artificial intelligence in digital pathology: a roadmap to routine use in clinical practice.人工智能在数字病理学中的应用:在临床实践中常规使用的路线图。
J Pathol. 2019 Oct;249(2):143-150. doi: 10.1002/path.5310. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
Digital pathology and artificial intelligence.数字病理学与人工智能。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):e253-e261. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30154-8.
8
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Pathology: Challenges and Opportunities.人工智能与数字病理学:挑战与机遇
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Nov 14;9:38. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_53_18. eCollection 2018.
9
Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.用于检测乳腺癌女性患者淋巴结转移的深度学习算法的诊断评估
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2199-2210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585.
10
An Image Analysis Resource for Cancer Research: PIIP-Pathology Image Informatics Platform for Visualization, Analysis, and Management.癌症研究的图像分析资源:用于可视化、分析和管理的PIIP-病理学图像信息学平台。
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e83-e86. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0323.