• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在放射学工作列表上实施机器学习软件可减少CT检测颅内出血时的扫描视图延迟。

Implementation of Machine Learning Software on the Radiology Worklist Decreases Scan View Delay for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage on CT.

作者信息

Ginat Daniel

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60615, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 23;11(7):832. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070832.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci11070832
PMID:34201775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8301803/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prompt identification of acute intracranial hemorrhage on CT is important. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of artificial intelligence software for prioritizing positive cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases analyzed by Aidoc (Tel Aviv, Israel) software for triaging acute intracranial hemorrhage cases on non-contrast head CT were retrospectively reviewed. The scan view delay time was calculated as the difference between the time the study was completed on PACS and the time the study was first opened by a radiologist. The scan view delay was stratified by scan location, including emergency, inpatient, and outpatient. The scan view delay times for cases flagged as positive by the software were compared to those that were not flagged.

RESULTS

A total of 8723 scans were assessed by the software, including 6894 cases that were not flagged and 1829 cases that were flagged as positive. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the scan view time for emergency cases, there was a significantly lower scan view time for positive outpatient and inpatient cases flagged by the software versus negative cases, with a reduction of 604 min on average, 90% in the scan view delay (-value < 0.0001) for outpatients, and a reduction of 38 min on average, and 10% in the scan view delay (-value <= 0.01) for inpatients.

CONCLUSION

The use of artificial intelligence triage software for acute intracranial hemorrhage on head CT scans is associated with a significantly shorter scan view delay for cases flagged as positive than cases not flagged among outpatients and inpatients at an academic medical center.

摘要

背景与目的

在CT上快速识别急性颅内出血很重要。本研究的目的是评估人工智能软件对阳性病例进行优先级排序的影响。

材料与方法

回顾性分析由以色列特拉维夫的Aidoc软件对非增强头部CT上的急性颅内出血病例进行分诊的病例。扫描查看延迟时间计算为研究在PACS上完成的时间与放射科医生首次打开研究的时间之差。扫描查看延迟按扫描部位分层,包括急诊、住院和门诊。将软件标记为阳性的病例的扫描查看延迟时间与未标记的病例进行比较。

结果

该软件共评估了8723次扫描,其中6894例未被标记,1829例被标记为阳性。虽然急诊病例的扫描查看时间没有统计学上的显著差异,但软件标记为阳性的门诊和住院病例的扫描查看时间明显低于阴性病例,门诊病例的扫描查看延迟平均减少604分钟,减少90%(P值<0.0001),住院病例的扫描查看延迟平均减少38分钟,减少10%(P值<=0.01)。

结论

在学术医疗中心,使用人工智能分诊软件对头部CT扫描中的急性颅内出血进行诊断,与未被标记的病例相比,被标记为阳性的病例的扫描查看延迟显著缩短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa6/8301803/e43ce2175154/brainsci-11-00832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa6/8301803/15442bdc216a/brainsci-11-00832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa6/8301803/e43ce2175154/brainsci-11-00832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa6/8301803/15442bdc216a/brainsci-11-00832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afa6/8301803/e43ce2175154/brainsci-11-00832-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of Machine Learning Software on the Radiology Worklist Decreases Scan View Delay for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage on CT.在放射学工作列表上实施机器学习软件可减少CT检测颅内出血时的扫描视图延迟。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 23;11(7):832. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070832.
2
Analysis of head CT scans flagged by deep learning software for acute intracranial hemorrhage.深度学习软件标记的急性颅内出血头部 CT 扫描分析。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Mar;62(3):335-340. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02330-w. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
3
Real world validation of an AI-based CT hemorrhage detection tool.基于人工智能的CT出血检测工具的真实世界验证
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 3;14:1177723. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1177723. eCollection 2023.
4
Retrospective analysis and prospective validation of an AI-based software for intracranial haemorrhage detection at a high-volume trauma centre.基于人工智能的脑出血检测软件在大容量创伤中心的回顾性分析和前瞻性验证。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 18;12(1):19885. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24504-y.
5
False Positives in Artificial Intelligence Prioritization Software for Intracranial Hemorrhage Identification in the Postoperative Period: A Report of Two Cases.人工智能颅内出血识别优先软件在术后阶段的假阳性:两例报告
Cureus. 2023 Aug 27;15(8):e44215. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44215. eCollection 2023 Aug.
6
Application of artificial intelligence centric workflows for evaluation of neuroradiology emergencies.以人工智能为中心的工作流程在神经放射学急症评估中的应用。
Clin Imaging. 2023 Sep;101:133-136. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
7
Active Reprioritization of the Reading Worklist Using Artificial Intelligence Has a Beneficial Effect on the Turnaround Time for Interpretation of Head CT with Intracranial Hemorrhage.使用人工智能对阅读工作列表进行主动重新排序对颅内出血头部CT解读的周转时间有有益影响。
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Nov 18;3(2):e200024. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020200024. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
FDA-approved deep learning software application versus radiologists with different levels of expertise: detection of intracranial hemorrhage in a retrospective single-center study.FDA批准的深度学习软件应用程序与不同专业水平的放射科医生对比:一项回顾性单中心研究中颅内出血的检测
Neuroradiology. 2022 May;64(5):981-990. doi: 10.1007/s00234-021-02874-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Artificial Intelligence Tool for Detection and Worklist Prioritization Reduces Time to Diagnosis of Incidental Pulmonary Embolism at CT.用于检测和工作列表优先级排序的人工智能工具可减少CT诊断偶然发现的肺栓塞的时间。
Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2023 Apr 20;5(2):e220163. doi: 10.1148/ryct.220163. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Utility of Artificial Intelligence Tool as a Prospective Radiology Peer Reviewer - Detection of Unreported Intracranial Hemorrhage.人工智能工具作为潜在放射学同行评审者的效用——检测未报告的颅内出血。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.035. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing AI in Routine Medical Imaging: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.常规医学影像中实施人工智能的促进因素和障碍:系统评价与定性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 21;27:e63649. doi: 10.2196/63649.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection in Non-Contrast Brain CT Scans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.深度学习在非增强脑部CT扫描中检测颅内出血的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 30;14(7):2377. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072377.
3
Assessment of commercially available artificial intelligence software for differentiating hemorrhage from contrast on head CT following thrombolysis for ischemic stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of an artificial intelligence tool with real-time clinical workflow integration - Detection of intracranial hemorrhage and pulmonary embolism.具有实时临床工作流程整合功能的人工智能工具的性能——颅内出血和肺栓塞的检测
Phys Med. 2021 Mar;83:154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Machine Learning and Improved Quality Metrics in Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage by Noncontrast Computed Tomography.机器学习和非对比 CT 改善急性颅内出血的质量指标。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022 Jul-Aug;51(4):556-561. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
3
Utility of Artificial Intelligence Tool as a Prospective Radiology Peer Reviewer - Detection of Unreported Intracranial Hemorrhage.
评估市售人工智能软件在缺血性中风溶栓后头颅CT上区分出血与造影剂的能力。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 4;16:1458142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1458142. eCollection 2025.
4
Effects of artificial intelligence implementation on efficiency in medical imaging-a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.人工智能在医学成像中的应用对效率的影响——一项系统的文献综述和荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Sep 30;7(1):265. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01248-9.
5
Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network.放射组学与深度特征:利用三维自动编码器神经网络对脑内出血进行稳健分类及再现性分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;11(7):643. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11070643.
6
Sociodemographic biases in a commercial AI model for intracranial hemorrhage detection.用于颅内出血检测的商业人工智能模型中的社会人口统计学偏差。
Emerg Radiol. 2024 Oct;31(5):713-723. doi: 10.1007/s10140-024-02270-w. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for analysing CT brain scans in people with a suspected acute stroke: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.软件采用人工智能衍生算法分析疑似急性脑卒中患者的 CT 脑扫描:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(11):1-204. doi: 10.3310/RDPA1487.
8
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Stroke: A Narrative Review of United States Food and Drug Administration-Approved Technologies.人工智能与机器学习在中风诊断和管理中的应用:美国食品药品监督管理局批准技术的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 May 30;12(11):3755. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113755.
9
Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence for Abnormality Detection in High-volume Neuroimaging and Subgroup Meta-analysis for Intracranial Hemorrhage Detection.系统评价人工智能在大容量神经影像学中的异常检测及亚组元分析在颅内出血检测中的应用
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Dec;33(4):943-956. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01291-1. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
10
The first case of glioma detected by an artificial intelligence algorithm running on real-time data in neurosurgery: illustrative case.神经外科中首例通过基于实时数据运行的人工智能算法检测出的胶质瘤病例:病例说明
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 May 8;5(19). doi: 10.3171/CASE22536.
人工智能工具作为潜在放射学同行评审者的效用——检测未报告的颅内出血。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jan;28(1):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.035. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
4
Analysis of head CT scans flagged by deep learning software for acute intracranial hemorrhage.深度学习软件标记的急性颅内出血头部 CT 扫描分析。
Neuroradiology. 2020 Mar;62(3):335-340. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02330-w. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Advanced machine learning in action: identification of intracranial hemorrhage on computed tomography scans of the head with clinical workflow integration.实用的高级机器学习:通过整合临床工作流程,在头部计算机断层扫描中识别颅内出血。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Apr 4;1:9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-017-0015-z. eCollection 2018.
6
Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study.深度学习算法在头部 CT 扫描中关键发现检测的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2388-2396. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
7
Automated deep-neural-network surveillance of cranial images for acute neurologic events.自动深度学习网络监测颅部图像中的急性神经系统事件。
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1337-1341. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0147-y. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
8
Subspecialized Radiological Reporting Expedites Turnaround Time of Radiology Reports and Increases Productivity.专科放射学报告加快了放射学报告的周转时间并提高了工作效率。
Rofo. 2018 Jul;190(7):623-629. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-100728. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Effect of Radiology Study Flow on Report Turnaround Time.放射学研究流程对报告周转时间的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec;209(6):1308-1311. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18282. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
10
Quantifying the Impact of Noninterpretive Tasks on Radiology Report Turn-Around Times.量化非解读性任务对放射学报告周转时间的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1498-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.023. Epub 2017 Sep 13.