• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于在勾画脑部危险器官时观察者间变异性的全国性研究。

A national study on the inter-observer variability in the delineation of organs at risk in the brain.

机构信息

Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2021 Nov;60(11):1548-1554. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1975813. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2021.1975813
PMID:34629014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Danish Neuro Oncology Group (DNOG) has established national consensus guidelines for the delineation of organs at risk (OAR) structures based on published literature. This study was conducted to finalise these guidelines and evaluate the inter-observer variability of the delineated OAR structures by expert observers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The DNOG delineation guidelines were formed by participants from all Danish centres that treat brain tumours with radiotherapy. In a two-day workshop, guidelines were discussed and finalised based on a pilot study. Following this, the ten participants contoured the following OARs on T1-weighted gadolinium enhanced MRI from 13 patients with brain tumours: optic tracts, optic nerves, chiasm, spinal cord, brainstem, pituitary gland and hippocampus. The metrics used for comparison were the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), mean surface distance (MSD) and others.

RESULTS

A total of 968 contours were delineated across the 13 patients. On average eight (range six to nine) individual contour sets were made per patient. Good agreement was found across all structures with a median MSD below 1 mm for most structures, with the chiasm performing the best with a median MSD of 0.45 mm. The Dice was as expected highly volume dependent, the brainstem (the largest structure) had the highest Dice value with a median of 0.89 whereas smaller volumes such as the chiasm had a Dice of 0.71.

CONCLUSION

Except for the caudal definition of the spinal cord, the variances observed in the contours of OARs in the brain were generally low and consistent. Surface mapping revealed sub-regions of higher variance for some organs. The data set is being prepared as a validation data set for auto-segmentation algorithms for use within the Danish Comprehensive Cancer Centre - Radiotherapy and potential collaborators.

摘要

背景

丹麦神经肿瘤学组(DNOG)根据已发表的文献制定了用于勾画危及器官(OAR)结构的国家共识指南。本研究旨在最终确定这些指南,并通过专家观察者评估勾画的 OAR 结构的观察者间变异性。

材料和方法

DNOG 勾画指南由所有用放疗治疗脑肿瘤的丹麦中心的参与者制定。在为期两天的研讨会上,根据试点研究讨论并最终确定了指南。在此之后,10 名参与者根据 13 名脑肿瘤患者的 T1 加权钆增强 MRI 勾画了以下 OAR:视束、视神经、视交叉、脊髓、脑干、垂体和海马。用于比较的指标是 Dice 相似系数(Dice)、平均表面距离(MSD)和其他指标。

结果

总共对 13 名患者的 968 个轮廓进行了勾画。平均每个患者有八套(范围为六到九套)独立的轮廓。大多数结构的平均 MSD 低于 1mm,表明所有结构之间的一致性较好,其中视交叉的表现最好,平均 MSD 为 0.45mm。Dice 与体积高度相关,脑干(最大的结构)的 Dice 值最高,中位数为 0.89,而较小的体积,如视交叉,Dice 值为 0.71。

结论

除了脊髓尾部的定义外,大脑中 OAR 轮廓的观察到的变异性通常较低且一致。表面映射显示某些器官的某些亚区具有较高的变异性。该数据集正在准备作为用于丹麦综合癌症中心 - 放射治疗和潜在合作者的自动分割算法的验证数据集。

相似文献

1
A national study on the inter-observer variability in the delineation of organs at risk in the brain.一项关于在勾画脑部危险器官时观察者间变异性的全国性研究。
Acta Oncol. 2021 Nov;60(11):1548-1554. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1975813. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
2
Magnetic resonance imaging organ at risk delineation for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy: Measuring the effectiveness of an educational intervention.磁共振成像器官危及器官勾画在鼻咽癌放疗中的应用:评估一项教育干预的效果。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Apr;70 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):59-69. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.651. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
The predictive value of segmentation metrics on dosimetry in organs at risk of the brain.分割指标对脑部危险器官剂量学的预测价值。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102161. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102161. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
4
Clinical Validation of a Deep-Learning Segmentation Software in Head and Neck: An Early Analysis in a Developing Radiation Oncology Center.深度学习分割软件在头颈部的临床验证:一个发展中的放射肿瘤学中心的早期分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9057. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159057.
5
Clinical feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术后乳腺癌患者基于深度学习的靶区体积和危及器官自动分割的临床可行性
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01771-z.
6
Cranial organs at risk delineation: heterogenous practices in radiotherapy planning.颅脑危险器官勾画:放疗计划中的混杂实践。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Feb 4;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01756-y.
7
Interobserver variability in organ at risk delineation in head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症中危险器官勾画的观察者间变异性。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun 28;16(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01677-2.
8
Investigation of autosegmentation techniques on T2-weighted MRI for off-line dose reconstruction in MR-linac workflow for head and neck cancers.针对头颈癌适形调强放射治疗中基于 T2 加权 MRI 的离线剂量重建,对自动分割技术进行了研究。
Med Phys. 2024 Jan;51(1):278-291. doi: 10.1002/mp.16582. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Improving automatic delineation for head and neck organs at risk by Deep Learning Contouring.深度学习勾画技术对头颈部危险器官自动勾画的改善。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jan;142:115-123. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
Comparing deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk and clinical target volumes to expert inter-observer variability in radiotherapy planning.比较基于深度学习的危及器官和临床靶区自动分割与放射治疗计划中专家间观察者变异性。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Mar;144:152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.019. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of deep learning model uncertainty on manual corrections to MRI-based auto-segmentation in prostate cancer radiotherapy.深度学习模型不确定性对前列腺癌放疗中基于MRI的自动分割手动校正的影响。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Sep;26(9):e70221. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70221.
2
Normal tissue outlining guidelines development for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.肢体软组织肉瘤正常组织轮廓勾画指南的制定
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jul 19;54:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.101020. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Deep learning-based delineation of whole-body organs at risk empowering adaptive radiotherapy.
基于深度学习的全身危及器官勾画助力自适应放疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03062-z.
4
Observer Variability in CT Angiography Carotid Segmentation: Assessing Variability to Set Minimum Clinical Performance.CT血管造影颈动脉分割中的观察者变异性:评估变异性以设定最低临床性能
J Neuroimaging. 2025 May-Jun;35(3):e70058. doi: 10.1111/jon.70058.
5
Deep Learning for Automated Ventricle and Periventricular Space Segmentation on CT and T1CE MRI in Neuro-Oncology Patients.深度学习用于神经肿瘤患者CT和T1CE MRI上的脑室及脑室周围间隙自动分割
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 8;17(10):1598. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101598.
6
Advancements in synthetic CT generation from MRI: A review of techniques, and trends in radiation therapy planning.基于 MRI 的合成 CT 生成技术的进展:放疗计划技术和趋势的综述。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Nov;25(11):e14499. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14499. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
7
Contouring aid tools in radiotherapy. Smoothing: the false friend.放射治疗中的轮廓勾画辅助工具。平滑处理:虚假的朋友。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Aug;26(8):1956-1967. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03420-9. Epub 2024 Mar 17.
8
Deep-learning magnetic resonance imaging-based automatic segmentation for organs-at-risk in the brain: Accuracy and impact on dose distribution.基于深度学习磁共振成像的脑内危及器官自动分割:准确性及对剂量分布的影响
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023 Jun 6;27:100454. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100454. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation.比较3D、2.5D和2D方法在脑图像自动分割中的应用
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;10(2):181. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020181.