Suppr超能文献

皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)、DLQI 相关和 Skindex-16 的测量特性比较研究。

A comparative study on the measurement properties of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), DLQI-Relevant and Skindex-16.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, H-1093, Budapest, Hungary.

Károly Rácz Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, 26 Üllői út, H-1085, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2022 Mar;186(3):485-495. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20765. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-16 are among the most commonly used dermatology-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instruments. DLQI has two common scoring methods, the original and the DLQI-Relevant (DLQI-R) modification. Head-to-head comparisons of the measurement properties of the DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to compare the measurement properties of the DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16.

METHODS

We analysed data from 618 patients with self-reported physician-diagnosed dermatological conditions from a cross-sectional survey carried out in Hungary in early 2020. DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 were compared in terms of ceiling and floor effects, informativity, convergent validity and known-group validity.

RESULTS

Mean DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 total scores were 3·76 ± 5·03, 4·11 ± 5·34 and 29·36 ± 26·62, respectively. Among patients with a DLQI/DLQI-R total score of zero, 64% reported problems on Skindex-16. Overall, 23-38% of patients with 'not relevant' responses on DLQI items 3 (shopping/home/gardening), 7 (working/studying), 8 (interpersonal problems) and 9 (sexual difficulties) reported problems on their corresponding Skindex-16 items. Average relative informativity (Shannon's evenness index) was the highest for Skindex-16 (0·85), followed by DLQI-R (0·66) and DLQI (0·54). DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 demonstrated similar convergent validity. DLQI was able to better discriminate between known groups of patients based on overall skin-related HRQoL impairment, whereas DLQI-R and Skindex-16 performed better with respect to self-perceived health status.

CONCLUSIONS

Skindex-16 seems to be more sensitive than DLQI/DLQI-R in capturing mild impairment in HRQoL. Our findings help to provide a fuller understanding of the difference between DLQI, DLQI-R and Skindex-16 and support the informed choice of instrument for clinical and research purposes.

摘要

背景

皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和 Skindex-16 是最常用于评估皮肤病相关生活质量(HRQoL)的特定于皮肤病的工具之一。DLQI 有两种常见的评分方法,即原始评分和 DLQI-R 修正评分。目前缺乏 DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 的测量特性的头对头比较。

目的

我们旨在比较 DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 的测量特性。

方法

我们分析了 2020 年初在匈牙利进行的横断面调查中 618 名自我报告有医生诊断的皮肤病患者的数据。比较了 DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 在天花板和地板效应、信息性、收敛有效性和已知组有效性方面的差异。

结果

平均 DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 总分分别为 3.76±5.03、4.11±5.34 和 29.36±26.62。在 DLQI/DLQI-R 总分均为 0 的患者中,64%报告在 Skindex-16 上存在问题。总体而言,23-38%的 DLQI 项目 3(购物/家务/园艺)、7(工作/学习)、8(人际问题)和 9(性困难)回答“不相关”的患者报告在其对应的 Skindex-16 项目上存在问题。信息性的平均相对信息率(Shannon 均匀度指数)最高的是 Skindex-16(0.85),其次是 DLQI-R(0.66)和 DLQI(0.54)。DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 表现出相似的收敛有效性。DLQI 能够更好地根据总体皮肤相关 HRQoL 受损程度来区分已知的患者组,而 DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 在自我感知健康状况方面表现更好。

结论

Skindex-16 在捕捉 HRQoL 轻度受损方面似乎比 DLQI/DLQI-R 更敏感。我们的发现有助于更全面地了解 DLQI、DLQI-R 和 Skindex-16 之间的差异,并支持在临床和研究目的方面根据需要选择工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验