Kazemzadeh Khashayar, Koglin Till
Transport and Roads, Department of Technology and Society, Faculty of Engineering, LTH Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
J Transp Health. 2021 Mar;20:101014. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101014. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic affects different domains of society, including the transport system. Due to the impacts of social distancing, research concerning electric bike (e-bike) applications and non(user) health and comfort concerns is needed. This research aims to understand the health and comfort concerns of e-bike (non)users in both pre (PR) and peri (PE) pandemic situations and explore how the PE situation triggers (non)users to use e-bikes.
An interpretive description qualitative method in the form of semi-structured interviews was used to gather the empirical material for this research.
Twenty-three (non)user participants were interviewed in the PR situation, and 12 of these participants were interviewed again in the PE situation. The comfort provided by the e-bike did not outweigh its cost as a factor for nonusers considering investing in the e-bikes in the PR situation. However, nonusers acknowledged that e-bikes can serve as substitutes for public transport by eliminating social interactions and consequently potential health concerns, in addition to providing comfortable mobility. E-bike users were in agreement concerning physical activity and the health benefits of using e-bikes in the PR situation. Their opinions differed slightly, as women placed less emphasis on the physical activity provided by e-bike use. However, gender opinions converged regarding health concerns about using public transport in PE situations. Infrastructure facilities and e-bike performance are evident as users' comfort concerns in the PE situation.
The results highlight the role of the e-bike in PE situations as a reliable transport mode and suggest that there is considerable potential for e-bikes as substitutes for public transport in the post-pandemic situation. The findings are applicable to e-bike level-of-service studies in order to provide an overview of the user's experience of comfort.
史无前例的新冠疫情影响着社会的不同领域,包括交通系统。由于社交距离的影响,有必要开展关于电动自行车(以下简称“电动车”)应用以及非使用者健康与舒适度问题的研究。本研究旨在了解疫情前(PR)和疫情期间(PE)电动车(非)使用者的健康与舒适度问题,并探讨疫情期间的情况如何促使(非)使用者选择使用电动车。
本研究采用半结构化访谈形式的诠释性描述质性研究方法来收集实证材料。
在疫情前的情况下,对23名(非)使用者参与者进行了访谈,其中12名参与者在疫情期间再次接受了访谈。在疫情前的情况下,对于非使用者而言,电动车所提供的舒适度并未超过其成本,这是他们考虑购买电动车的一个因素。然而,非使用者承认,除了提供舒适的出行体验外,电动车还可以通过消除社交互动从而减少潜在的健康问题,成为公共交通的替代品。电动车使用者对于在疫情前的情况下进行体育活动以及使用电动车对健康有益这两点达成了共识。他们的观点略有不同,因为女性对使用电动车所提供的体育活动的重视程度较低。然而,在疫情期间使用公共交通对健康的担忧方面,不同性别的观点趋于一致。在疫情期间的情况下,基础设施和电动车性能显然是使用者舒适度方面所关注的问题。
研究结果凸显了电动车在疫情期间作为可靠交通方式的作用,并表明在疫情后,电动车作为公共交通替代品具有相当大的潜力。这些研究结果适用于电动车服务水平研究,以便概述使用者的舒适体验。