• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年心理健康中的共同生产:系统评价。

Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Mental Health Engagement & Recovery, St. Loman's Hospital, D20 HK69 Dublin, Ireland.

Adult Continuing Education, The Laurels, University College Cork, College Road, T12 YN60 Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211897.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph182211897
PMID:34831653
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8623106/
Abstract

Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: '' and ''. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review.

摘要

心理健康服务目前正在经历许多系统和组织上的变革。许多国家通过制定国家政策和框架,采用了恢复服务提供的方法。在爱尔兰的背景下,共同生产被确定为服务实现恢复导向所必需的四个支柱之一。然而,关于儿童和青少年心理健康服务中共同生产的概念,文献却很少。本文旨在综合综述该服务中共同生产的同行评议证据。进行了一项符合 PRISMA 的系统评价。这包括评论员如何检索、筛选和选择纳入审查的研究。它概述了纳入/排除标准,以及如何通过 PICO 框架进一步制定这些标准。最后,方法还概述了评论员如何评估偏倚和质量,以及数据综合的过程。本综述纳入了两项研究,都集中在共同生产方面,但在儿童和青少年心理健康服务的不同背景下。确定了两个主题:“”和“”。这些主题和相关的子主题描述了共同生产在这些服务中的运作方式。这些结果突显了儿童和青少年心理健康领域共同生产高质量文献的匮乏。这两项研究在质量方面得分都很低。基于本次综述,需要采取一些与治疗环境有关的行动,以进一步实施共同生产。评论员没有为本论文获得任何资金。该综述没有为该审查创建或注册协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/756570115c6a/ijerph-18-11897-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/8fbbb43fd084/ijerph-18-11897-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/c3851147c2ea/ijerph-18-11897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/eeacbacda4b4/ijerph-18-11897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/bfa83652404e/ijerph-18-11897-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/756570115c6a/ijerph-18-11897-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/8fbbb43fd084/ijerph-18-11897-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/c3851147c2ea/ijerph-18-11897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/eeacbacda4b4/ijerph-18-11897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/bfa83652404e/ijerph-18-11897-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e64d/8623106/756570115c6a/ijerph-18-11897-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年心理健康中的共同生产:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211897.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Family Recovery Interventions with Families of Mental Health Service Users: A Systematic Review of the Literature.精神卫生服务使用者家庭的家庭康复干预措施:文献系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157858.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Suicide prevention: What does the evidence show for the effectiveness of safety planning for children and young people? - A systematic scoping review.自杀预防:关于儿童和青少年安全计划有效性的证据有哪些?——一项系统综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):899-910. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12928. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards Coproduction in Mental Health Academia: A Cooperative Inquiry.迈向精神卫生学术界的共同生产:合作探究
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(4):e70108. doi: 10.1111/inm.70108.
2
The use of co-design with young people for digital mental health support development: A systematic review.与年轻人共同设计以开发数字心理健康支持:一项系统综述。
Internet Interv. 2025 May 31;41:100835. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100835. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Collaborating With Young People: Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators in Co-Designed Research.

本文引用的文献

1
Family Recovery Interventions with Families of Mental Health Service Users: A Systematic Review of the Literature.精神卫生服务使用者家庭的家庭康复干预措施:文献系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 25;18(15):7858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157858.
2
Development of the Niggle App for Supporting Young People on Their Dynamic Journey to Well-being: Co-design and Qualitative Research Study.Niggle 应用程序的开发,旨在支持年轻人在动态的幸福之旅:共同设计和定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 20;9(4):e21085. doi: 10.2196/21085.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
与年轻人合作:识别共同设计研究中的障碍与促进因素
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70308. doi: 10.1111/hex.70308.
4
Pilot Testing an Ecotherapy Program for Adolescence: Initial Findings and Methodological Reflections.针对青少年的生态疗法项目的试点测试:初步结果与方法学思考
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 1;22(5):720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050720.
5
Codesign is the zeitgeist of our time, but what do we mean by this? A scoping review of the concept of codesign in collaborative research with young people.共同设计是我们这个时代的时代精神,但我们对此是什么意思呢?对与年轻人合作开展研究中的共同设计概念的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Apr 29;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01328-6.
6
A rapid realist review of literature examining Co-production in mental health services for youth.一项对有关青少年心理健康服务中共同生产的文献进行的快速实证综述。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Aug 21;4(4):e12272. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12272. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Adolescents' involvement in mental health treatment and service design: a systematic review.青少年参与心理健康治疗和服务设计:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11892-2.
8
An in-depth understanding of stakeholders' experiences about their participation in the co-production of 'Maze Out': a serious game for the treatment of eating disorders.深入了解利益相关者参与“走出迷宫”共同制作的经历:一款用于治疗饮食失调的严肃游戏。
J Eat Disord. 2024 Nov 14;12(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01136-3.
9
A protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of unguided internet cognitive behaviour therapy for grief in adolescents.一项针对青少年悲伤情绪的无指导互联网认知行为疗法的试点随机对照试验方案。
Internet Interv. 2024 Sep 3;38:100771. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100771. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
A Digital Microintervention Supporting Evidence-Based Parenting Skills: Development Study Using the Agile Scrum Methodology.一种支持循证育儿技能的数字微干预措施:采用敏捷Scrum方法的开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 28;8:e54892. doi: 10.2196/54892.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Co-creating social licence for sharing health and care data.共同创建共享健康和医疗数据的社会许可。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104439. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104439. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Co-production of knowledge: the future.知识共创:未来。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.
6
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.更新系统评价报告指南:PRISMA 2020 声明的制定。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Effects of a peer co-facilitated educational programme for parents of children with ADHD: a feasibility randomised controlled trial protocol.同伴共同促进的 ADHD 患儿家长教育计划的效果:一项可行性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):e039852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039852.
8
Is sharing really caring? A vision or an aspiration? Irelands new mental health policy 2020.分享真的是关怀吗?是愿景还是抱负?爱尔兰2020年新的心理健康政策。
Ir J Psychol Med. 2023 Jun;40(2):310-311. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.118. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Predictors of participation and quality of life following major traumatic injuries in childhood: a systematic review.儿童重大创伤后参与度和生活质量的预测因素:系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2591-2607. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1849425. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
10
Narrative Matters: Mental health recovery - considerations when working with youth.叙事治疗:精神健康康复——与年轻人一起工作时的注意事项。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020 Nov;25(4):273-276. doi: 10.1111/camh.12419. Epub 2020 Sep 1.