• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在资源匮乏环境下对 COVID-19 样本采集、诊断和接触者追踪的成本分析:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴为例。

Cost-analysis of COVID-19 sample collection, diagnosis, and contact tracing in low resource setting: The case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

机构信息

National Data Management Center for Health, Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Partnership and Cooperation Directorate, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269458. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269458
PMID:35679290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9182302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ethiopia has been responding to the COVID-19 pandemic through a combination of interventions, including non-pharmaceutical interventions, quarantine, testing, isolation, contact tracing, and clinical management. Estimating the resources consumed for COVID-19 prevention and control could inform efficient decision-making for epidemic/pandemic-prone diseases in the future. This study aims to estimate the unit cost of COVID-19 sample collection, laboratory diagnosis, and contact tracing in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

METHODS

Primary and secondary data were collected to estimate the costs of COVID-19 sample collection, diagnosis, and contact tracing. A healthcare system perspective was used. We used a combination of micro-costing (bottom-up) and top-down approaches to estimate resources consumed and the unit costs of the interventions. We used available cost and outcome data between May and December 2020. The costs were classified into capital and recurrent inputs to estimate unit and total costs. We identified the cost drivers of the interventions. We reported the cost for the following outcome measures: (1) cost per sample collected, (2) cost per laboratory diagnosis, (3) cost per sample collected and laboratory diagnosis, (4) cost per contact traced, and (5) cost per COVID-19 positive test identified. We conducted one-way sensitivity analysis by varying the input parameters. All costs were reported in US dollars (USD).

RESULTS

The unit cost per sample collected was USD 1.33. The unit cost of tracing a contact of an index case was USD 0.66. The unit cost of COVID-19 diagnosis, excluding the cost for sample collection was USD 3.91. The unit cost of sample collection per COVID-19 positive individual was USD 11.63. The unit cost for COVID-19 positive test through contact tracing was USD 54.00. The unit cost COVID-19 DNA PCR diagnosis for identifying COVID-19 positive individuals, excluding the sample collection and transport cost, was USD 37.70. The cost per COVID-19 positive case identified was USD 49.33 including both sample collection and laboratory diagnosis costs. Among the cost drivers, personnel cost (salary and food cost) takes the highest share for all interventions, ranging from 51-76% of the total cost.

CONCLUSION

The costs of sample collection, diagnosis, and contact tracing for COVID-19 were high given the low per capita health expenditure in Ethiopia and other low-income settings. Since the personnel cost accounts for the highest cost, decision-makers should focus on minimizing this cost when faced with pandemic-prone diseases by strengthening the health system and using digital platforms. The findings of this study can help decision-makers prioritize and allocate resources for effective public health emergency response.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/0b78aa30fab8/pone.0269458.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/5acc3bf30704/pone.0269458.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/bb6ae39c8b3d/pone.0269458.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/e6ae839a7117/pone.0269458.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/0b78aa30fab8/pone.0269458.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/5acc3bf30704/pone.0269458.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/bb6ae39c8b3d/pone.0269458.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/e6ae839a7117/pone.0269458.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5639/9182302/0b78aa30fab8/pone.0269458.g004.jpg

背景

埃塞俄比亚通过综合干预措施应对 COVID-19 疫情,包括非药物干预措施、检疫、检测、隔离、接触者追踪和临床管理。估算 COVID-19 防控所消耗的资源,可以为未来应对易发生疫情/大流行的疾病提供有效的决策依据。本研究旨在估算埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴 COVID-19 样本采集、实验室诊断和接触者追踪的单位成本。

方法

收集了初级和次级数据,以估算 COVID-19 样本采集、诊断和接触者追踪的成本。采用卫生保健系统视角。我们结合微观成本法(自下而上)和自上而下的方法来估算干预措施所消耗的资源和单位成本。我们利用 2020 年 5 月至 12 月期间可用的成本和结果数据。成本分为资本和经常性投入,以估算单位和总费用。我们确定了干预措施的成本驱动因素。我们报告了以下结果指标的成本:(1)每份样本采集的成本,(2)每份实验室诊断的成本,(3)样本采集和实验室诊断的每份成本,(4)每份接触者追踪的成本,(5)每份 COVID-19 阳性检测的成本。我们通过改变输入参数进行了单因素敏感性分析。所有成本均以美元(USD)报告。

结果

每份样本采集的单位成本为 1.33 美元。追踪病例接触者的单位成本为 0.66 美元。COVID-19 诊断的单位成本(不包括样本采集成本)为 3.91 美元。每例 COVID-19 阳性个体的样本采集单位成本为 11.63 美元。通过接触者追踪发现 COVID-19 阳性个体的单位成本为 54.00 美元。用于确定 COVID-19 阳性个体的 COVID-19 DNA PCR 诊断的单位成本(不包括样本采集和运输成本)为 37.70 美元。包括样本采集和实验室诊断费用在内,每例 COVID-19 阳性病例的识别成本为 49.33 美元。在成本驱动因素中,人员成本(工资和食品成本)占所有干预措施总成本的 51%-76%,占比最高。

结论

鉴于埃塞俄比亚和其他低收入国家的人均卫生支出较低,COVID-19 的样本采集、诊断和接触者追踪成本较高。由于人员成本占总成本的比例最高,决策者在应对易发生大流行的疾病时,应着眼于通过加强卫生系统和使用数字平台来最小化这一成本。本研究的结果可以帮助决策者为有效的公共卫生应急响应确定优先事项和分配资源。

相似文献

1
Cost-analysis of COVID-19 sample collection, diagnosis, and contact tracing in low resource setting: The case of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.在资源匮乏环境下对 COVID-19 样本采集、诊断和接触者追踪的成本分析:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 9;17(6):e0269458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269458. eCollection 2022.
2
Hospitalization costs for COVID-19 in Ethiopia: Empirical data and analysis from Addis Ababa's largest dedicated treatment center.埃塞俄比亚 COVID-19 的住院费用:来自亚的斯亚贝巴最大专用治疗中心的实证数据和分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0260930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260930. eCollection 2022.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
4
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings: A cost analysis study of diagnostic tests using different Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR technologies in Mozambique.资源有限环境下的新型冠状病毒2019检测:莫桑比克使用不同抗原快速检测试剂和逆转录聚合酶链反应技术进行诊断检测的成本分析研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;3(6):e0001999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001999. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study.南非 COVID-19 疫情防控公共卫生策略的成本效益:微观模拟建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e120-e129. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30452-6. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Cost of childhood cancer treatment in Ethiopia.儿童癌症治疗在埃塞俄比亚的成本。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286461. eCollection 2023.
7
Cost-analysis of real time RT-PCR test performed for COVID-19 diagnosis at India's national reference laboratory during the early stages of pandemic mitigation.大流行缓解初期印度国家参考实验室进行的 COVID-19 诊断实时 RT-PCR 检测的成本分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 11;18(1):e0277867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277867. eCollection 2023.
8
Inpatient Care Costs of COVID-19 in South Africa's Public Healthcare System.南非公共医疗体系中 COVID-19 患者的住院费用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1354-1361. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.24. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
9
Cost-effectiveness of running a paediatric oncology unit in Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚运行儿科肿瘤病房的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 14;13(3):e068210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068210.
10
Cost-effectiveness of facility-based, stand-alone and mobile-based voluntary counseling and testing for HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴基于医疗机构、独立式和移动式的艾滋病毒自愿咨询和检测的成本效益分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Sep 11;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00231-x. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Using an app for COVID-19 contact tracing costs less per person traced than manual tracing: microcosting analysis of a randomised trial in Cameroon.使用应用程序进行新冠病毒接触者追踪的人均成本低于人工追踪:喀麦隆一项随机试验的微观成本分析
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;2(Suppl 1):e001064. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001064. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Value for money of medicine sampling and quality testing: evidence from Indonesia.药品抽样和质量检测的性价比:来自印度尼西亚的证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Sep 23;9(9):e015402. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015402.
3
From Emergence to Endemicity: A Comprehensive Review of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying optimal COVID-19 testing strategies for schools and businesses: Balancing testing frequency, individual test technology, and cost.确定学校和企业的最佳 COVID-19 检测策略:平衡检测频率、个体检测技术和成本。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248783. eCollection 2021.
2
Toward universal health coverage in the post-COVID-19 era.在后 COVID-19 时代实现全民健康覆盖。
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):380-387. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01268-y. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Hospitalizations, Fatalities, and Economic Outcomes Associated with Universal Versus Anaphylaxis Risk-Stratified COVID-19 Vaccination Strategies.
从出现到地方性流行:对新冠病毒病的全面综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48046. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48046. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings: A cost analysis study of diagnostic tests using different Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR technologies in Mozambique.资源有限环境下的新型冠状病毒2019检测:莫桑比克使用不同抗原快速检测试剂和逆转录聚合酶链反应技术进行诊断检测的成本分析研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;3(6):e0001999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001999. eCollection 2023.
5
Community Wastewater-Based Surveillance Can Be a Cost-Effective Approach to Track COVID-19 Outbreak in Low-Resource Settings: Feasibility Assessment for Ethiopia Context.社区污水监测可作为一种在资源匮乏环境中追踪 COVID-19 疫情的具有成本效益的方法:在埃塞俄比亚环境下的可行性评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148515.
一种与新冠疫苗接种策略相关的住院、死亡和经济结果的成本效益评估:普遍接种与基于过敏风险分层接种的比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jul;9(7):2658-2668.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.054. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
New COVID-19 Vaccines, Its Cost and Shelf Life: A Cost Effectiveness Analysis.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗、成本及保质期:成本效益分析
Arch Med Res. 2021 May;52(4):453. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.12.008. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
Cochrane corner: digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics.科克伦专栏:传染病中的数字接触者追踪技术。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Sep 12;37(Suppl 1):8. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.8.25986. eCollection 2020.
6
Establishment of COVID-19 testing laboratory in resource-limited settings: challenges and prospects reported from Ethiopia.资源有限环境下的 COVID-19 检测实验室的建立:来自埃塞俄比亚的报告显示的挑战与展望。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1841963. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1841963.
7
Cost-effectiveness of public health strategies for COVID-19 epidemic control in South Africa: a microsimulation modelling study.南非 COVID-19 疫情防控公共卫生策略的成本效益:微观模拟建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e120-e129. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30452-6. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
8
Protecting essential health services in low-income and middle-income countries and humanitarian settings while responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.在应对 COVID-19 大流行的同时,保护低收入和中等收入国家及人道主义环境中的基本卫生服务。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003675.
9
Clinical Impact, Costs, and Cost-effectiveness of Expanded Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Testing in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州扩大严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测的临床影响、成本及成本效益
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2908-e2917. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1418.
10
Integrating emerging technologies into COVID-19 contact tracing: Opportunities, challenges and pitfalls.将新兴技术融入 COVID-19 接触者追踪:机遇、挑战和陷阱。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Nov-Dec;14(6):1631-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 26.