• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲不同形式的社会资本对幸福感的重要性:多层次结构方程模型(GSEM)

The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Happiness in Europe: A Multilevel Structural Equation Model (GSEM).

作者信息

Gómez-Balcácer Lucía, Somarriba Arechavala Noelia, Gómez-Costilla Patricia

机构信息

Department of Applied Economics, University of Valladolid, María Zambrano Campus, Plaza de la Universidad 1, 40005 Segovia, Spain.

Department of Economic Analysis, University of Valladolid, María Zambrano Campus, Plaza de la Universidad 1, 40005 Segovia, Spain.

出版信息

Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):601-624. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10097-1. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11482-022-10097-1
PMID:36035603
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9395802/
Abstract

This paper investigates the effects of different dimensions of social capital ​on happiness of Europeans. Unlike other studies, a categorical principal component analysis (CATPCA) is applied to obtain the dimensions of social capital. The data used come from the ninth wave of the European Social Survey (ESS), year 2018. Happiness is modelled using a multilevel structural equations model (GSEM) by country to study the role of social capital in Europeans' happiness, when controlling for the effect of factors such as gender, unemployment, age, low income, higher education, and living with a partner. Social capital is measured as a multidimensional concept composed of institutional trust, social trust, social ties and voluntary association, civility and sense of belonging, and religiosity. Among the results, we found that the five dimensions that build social capital have a positive impact on happiness. In addition to the positive effects of social capital, the control variables have the expected impact. In a context marked by growing individualism and social isolation, the results of this work can guide policy makers in using the dimensions of social capital to increase the subjective well-being of the population.

摘要

本文研究了社会资本的不同维度对欧洲人幸福感的影响。与其他研究不同,本文应用了分类主成分分析(CATPCA)来获取社会资本的维度。所使用的数据来自2018年欧洲社会调查(ESS)的第九轮调查。通过国家层面的多水平结构方程模型(GSEM)对幸福感进行建模,以研究社会资本在欧洲人幸福感中的作用,同时控制性别、失业、年龄、低收入、高等教育以及与伴侣同住等因素的影响。社会资本被衡量为一个多维概念,由制度信任、社会信任、社会关系和自愿协会、文明和归属感以及宗教信仰组成。在研究结果中,我们发现构成社会资本的五个维度对幸福感有积极影响。除了社会资本的积极影响外,控制变量也产生了预期的影响。在一个以个人主义和社会孤立不断加剧为特征的背景下,这项工作的结果可以指导政策制定者利用社会资本的维度来提高民众的主观幸福感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/9395802/6e38f418705a/11482_2022_10097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/9395802/6e38f418705a/11482_2022_10097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/9395802/6e38f418705a/11482_2022_10097_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Happiness in Europe: A Multilevel Structural Equation Model (GSEM).欧洲不同形式的社会资本对幸福感的重要性:多层次结构方程模型(GSEM)
Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(1):601-624. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10097-1. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
The Impact of Psychological Capital and Social Capital on Residents' Mental Health and Happiness During COVID-19: Evidence From China.心理资本和社会资本对新冠疫情期间居民心理健康与幸福感的影响:来自中国的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 18;13:962373. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962373. eCollection 2022.
3
The Relationship Between Social Capital, the Happiness of Others, and the Happiness of Korean Adults: A National Sample Study.社会资本、他人幸福感与韩国成年人幸福感之间的关系:一项全国样本研究
Psychiatry Investig. 2022 Nov;19(11):958-964. doi: 10.30773/pi.2022.0050. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Social and psychological correlates of happiness in 17 European countries.17个欧洲国家幸福度的社会与心理关联因素
Ir J Psychol Med. 2010 Sep;27(3):130-134. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700001294.
5
Right-wing populism and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis.右翼民粹主义与欧洲自评健康:一项多层次分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):1116-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211995. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
The social context of well-being.幸福的社会背景。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1435-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.
7
The mediating role of social capital in the relationship between socioeconomic status and adolescent wellbeing: evidence from Ghana.社会资本在社会经济地位与青少年健康福祉之间关系中的中介作用:来自加纳的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8142-x.
8
Do you feel happy when other members look happy? Moderating effect of community-level social capital on interconnection of happiness.当其他成员感到快乐时,你是否也感到快乐?社区层面社会资本对幸福感互联的调节作用。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Oct;56(5):642-653. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12744. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
Income Inequality, Neighbourhood Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being in China: Exploration of a Moderating Effect.收入不平等、邻里社会资本与中国主观幸福感:调节效应的探索
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6799. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136799.
10
Which part of community social capital is related to life satisfaction and self-rated health? A multilevel analysis based on a nationwide mail survey in Japan.社区社会资本的哪个部分与生活满意度和自评健康有关?基于日本全国性邮件调查的多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:169-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Both religious and secular ethics to achieve both happiness and health: Panel data results based on a dynamic theoretical model.宗教和世俗伦理都能实现幸福和健康:基于动态理论模型的面板数据结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0301905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301905. eCollection 2024.
2
Estimating the prevalence and characteristics of people in severe social isolation in 29 European countries: A secondary analysis of data from the European Social Survey round 9 (2018-2020).估算 29 个欧洲国家中严重社会孤立人群的流行率和特征:对欧洲社会调查第 9 轮(2018-2020 年)数据的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 12;18(9):e0291341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291341. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of data reduction techniques for questionnaire validation using self-reported driver behaviors.使用自我报告的驾驶行为对问卷进行验证的数据缩减技术的比较分析。
J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Making sense of Cronbach's alpha.理解克朗巴哈系数。
Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
3
Measuring psychological resilience to disasters: are evidence-based indicators an achievable goal?衡量对灾难的心理复原力:基于证据的指标是一个可实现的目标吗?
Environ Health. 2013 Dec 20;12:115. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-115.
4
Why are religious people happy? The effect of the social norm of religiosity across countries.为什么宗教人士更快乐?宗教信仰的社会规范在各国的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 Jan;42(1):90-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
5
Re-Examining the Case for Marriage: Union Formation and Changes in Well-Being.重新审视婚姻问题:结合形式与幸福感的变化
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Feb 1;74(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00873.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
6
Nonlinear principal components analysis with CATPCA: a tutorial.非线性主成分分析与 CATPCA:教程。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(1):12-25. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.627965.
7
Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis.主观幸福感与生活事件适应:一项元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):592-615. doi: 10.1037/a0025948. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll.世界各地的收入、健康与幸福:盖洛普世界民意调查的证据
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Spring;22(2):53-72. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53.
9
Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?幸福感在生命周期中呈U形吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Apr;66(8):1733-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
10
Happiness and health: lessons--and questions--for public policy.幸福与健康:公共政策的经验教训及问题
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):72-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.72.