Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Riverfield Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 6;17(10):e0274328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274328. eCollection 2022.
To determine acceptable limits of communication delays in telesurgery, we investigated the impact of communication delays under a dynamic environment using a surgical assist robot. Previous studies have evaluated acceptable delays under static environments. Effects of delays may be enhanced in dynamic environments, but studies have not yet focused on this point.
Thirty-four subjects with different surgical experience (Group1: no surgical experience; Group2: only laparoscopic surgical experience; Group3: robotic surgery experience) performed 4 tasks under different delays (0, 70, 100, 150, 200, or 300 ms) using a surgical assist robot. Task accomplishment time and total movement distance of forceps were recorded and compared under different communication delays of 0-300 ms. In addition, surgical performance was compared between Group1or Group2 without delay and Group3 with communication delays.
Significant differences in task accomplishment time were found between delays of 0 and 70 ms, but not between delays of 70 and 100 ms. Thereafter, the greater the communication delay, the longer the task accomplishment time. Similar results were obtained in total movement distance of forceps. Comparisons between Group3 with delay and Group1 or Group2 without delay demonstrated that surgical performance in Group3 with delay was superior or equal to that of Group1 or Group2 without delay as long as the delay was 100 ms or less.
Communication delays in telesurgery may be acceptable if 100 ms or less. Experienced surgeons with more than 100 ms of delay could outperform less-experienced surgeons without delay.
为了确定远程手术中可接受的通信延迟极限,我们使用手术辅助机器人研究了动态环境下通信延迟的影响。以前的研究已经评估了静态环境下的可接受延迟。在动态环境中,延迟的影响可能会增强,但目前还没有研究关注这一点。
34 名具有不同手术经验的受试者(无手术经验的组 1;仅腹腔镜手术经验的组 2;机器人手术经验的组 3)使用手术辅助机器人在不同延迟(0、70、100、150、200 或 300 ms)下完成 4 项任务。在 0-300ms 的不同通信延迟下,记录和比较完成任务的时间和钳子的总运动距离。此外,还比较了无延迟的组 1 或组 2 和有通信延迟的组 3 之间的手术表现。
在 0 与 70ms 延迟之间,任务完成时间存在显著差异,但在 70 与 100ms 延迟之间则无差异。此后,通信延迟越大,任务完成时间越长。钳子的总运动距离也得到了类似的结果。与无延迟的组 3 相比,延迟的组 3 与无延迟的组 1 或组 2 之间的比较表明,只要延迟不超过 100ms,延迟的组 3 的手术表现就优于或等于无延迟的组 1 或组 2。
如果延迟不超过 100ms,远程手术中的通信延迟是可以接受的。经验丰富的外科医生在延迟超过 100ms 的情况下可以胜过没有延迟的经验较少的外科医生。