Romano Angelo, Gross Jörg, De Dreu Carsten K W
Social, Economic, and Organizational Psychology Department, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Nov 22;1(5):pgac267. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac267. eCollection 2022 Nov.
In a globalizing world, conflict between citizens and foreigners hinders cooperation and hampers how well the global community can tackle shared problems. Here, we study conflict between citizens and foreigners and find that people substantially misperceive how competitive foreigners are. Citizens (from 51 countries; = 12,863; 656,274 decisions) interacted with foreigners in incentivized contest experiments. People across the globe systematically failed to anticipate the competitiveness of foreigners and either competed too much or too little. Competition was poorly explained by differences in cultural values or environmental stress. By contrast, competition and concomitant conflict misperceptions were robustly accounted for by differences in the wealth of nations, institutions, and histories of engaging in international conflict. Our results reveal how macro-level socio-economic differences between countries create false stereotypes and might breed conflict.
在一个全球化的世界中,公民与外国人之间的冲突阻碍了合作,并妨碍了全球社会应对共同问题的能力。在此,我们研究公民与外国人之间的冲突,发现人们严重误解了外国人的竞争程度。公民(来自51个国家;样本量=12,863;656,274次决策)在有激励的竞赛实验中与外国人互动。全球各地的人们系统性地未能预料到外国人的竞争力,要么竞争过度,要么竞争不足。文化价值观或环境压力的差异对竞争的解释力很差。相比之下,国家财富、制度以及参与国际冲突的历史差异,有力地解释了竞争以及随之而来的冲突误解。我们的研究结果揭示了国家间宏观层面的社会经济差异如何造成错误的刻板印象,并可能滋生冲突。