Wang Jingjing, Zhao Siqi, Xu Song, Zhao Wei, Zhang Xiaoxia, Lei Yu, Zhai Huanhuan, Huang Zhiyong
Tianjin Key Laboratory for Industrial Biological Systems and Bioprocessing Engineering, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Technology Innovation Center of Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Feb 9;14:1101773. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1101773. eCollection 2023.
Microbial inoculation with plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) is one of the most promising technologies to solve the current global challenges. Co-inoculants is more efficient and stable than mono-inoculants. However, the growth promoting mechanism of co-inoculants in complex soil system is still poorly understood. In this study, the effects on rice, soil and the microbiome of the mono-inoculant FH-1 (F) and NYM3 (N) and the co-inoculant FN obtained in previous works were compared. Correlation analysis and PLS-PM were used to explore the primary mechanism of different inoculants promoting rice growth. We hypothesized that inoculants promoted plant growth (i) by themselves, (ii) by improving soil nutrient availability or (iii) by regulating the rhizosphere microbiome in complex soil system. We also assumed that different inoculants had different ways of promoting plant growth. The results showed that FN significantly promoted rice growth and nitrogen absorption and slightly increased soil total nitrogen and microbial network complexity compared with F, N and the control (CK). FH-1 and NYM3 interfered with each other's colonization in FN. FN increased the complexity of the microbial network compared to F and N. The bacterial community of FN was quite different from CK and N, while the fungal community was not significantly different from other treatments. The species and functions enriched or inhibited by FN are part of F. The correlation analysis and PLS-PM results showed that inoculants (F/N/FN) promoted the growth of rice mainly by regulating the rhizosphere microbiome rather than by themselves or by improving soil nutrient availability. Co-inoculant FN promotes rice growth specifically by enhancing microbial nitrification function through enriching related species compared with F or N. This may provide theoretical guidance for the construction and application of co-inoculants in the future.
接种促进植物生长的微生物(PGPMs)是解决当前全球挑战最具前景的技术之一。复合菌剂比单一菌剂更高效、稳定。然而,复合菌剂在复杂土壤系统中的促生长机制仍知之甚少。本研究比较了前期工作中获得的单一菌剂FH-1(F)和NYM3(N)以及复合菌剂FN对水稻、土壤和微生物群落的影响。采用相关性分析和偏最小二乘路径模型(PLS-PM)探究不同菌剂促进水稻生长的主要机制。我们假设菌剂促进植物生长的方式有:(i)自身作用;(ii)提高土壤养分有效性;(iii)在复杂土壤系统中调节根际微生物群落。我们还假定不同菌剂促进植物生长的方式不同。结果表明,与F、N和对照(CK)相比,FN显著促进水稻生长和氮吸收,略微增加土壤全氮和微生物网络复杂性。FH-1和NYM3在FN中相互干扰彼此的定殖。与F和N相比,FN增加了微生物网络的复杂性。FN的细菌群落与CK和N有很大差异,而真菌群落与其他处理无显著差异。FN富集或抑制的物种和功能是F的一部分。相关性分析和PLS-PM结果表明,菌剂(F/N/FN)主要通过调节根际微生物群落而非自身作用或提高土壤养分有效性来促进水稻生长。与F或N相比,复合菌剂FN通过富集相关物种增强微生物硝化功能,从而特异性促进水稻生长。这可能为未来复合菌剂的构建和应用提供理论指导。