• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业与 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率研究:系统综述。

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies: a systematic review.

机构信息

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e063771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063771.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063771
PMID:36854599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9979591/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe and synthesise studies of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence by occupation prior to the widespread vaccine roll-out.

METHODS

We identified studies of occupational seroprevalence from a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020183634). Electronic databases, grey literature and news media were searched for studies published during January-December 2020. Seroprevalence estimates and a free-text description of the occupation were extracted and classified according to the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) 2010 system using a machine-learning algorithm. Due to heterogeneity, results were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

We identified 196 studies including 591 940 participants from 38 countries. Most studies (n=162; 83%) were conducted locally versus regionally or nationally. Sample sizes were generally small (median=220 participants per occupation) and 135 studies (69%) were at a high risk of bias. One or more estimates were available for 21/23 major SOC occupation groups, but over half of the estimates identified (n=359/600) were for healthcare-related occupations. 'Personal Care and Service Occupations' (median 22% (IQR 9-28%); n=14) had the highest median seroprevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

Many seroprevalence studies covering a broad range of occupations were published in the first year of the pandemic. Results suggest considerable differences in seroprevalence between occupations, although few large, high-quality studies were done. Well-designed studies are required to improve our understanding of the occupational risk of SARS-CoV-2 and should be considered as an element of pandemic preparedness for future respiratory pathogens.

摘要

目的

描述并综合 2020 年广泛疫苗接种前,职业相关的 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率研究。

方法

我们从一项正在进行的系统综述(PROSPERO CRD42020183634)中确定了职业血清流行率研究。电子数据库、灰色文献和新闻媒体都被用来搜索 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间发表的研究。提取血清流行率估计值和职业的自由文本描述,并使用机器学习算法根据 2010 年标准职业分类(SOC)系统进行分类。由于存在异质性,结果以叙述性方式进行综合。

结果

我们确定了 196 项研究,涉及来自 38 个国家的 591940 名参与者。大多数研究(n=162;83%)是在当地进行的,而不是在地区或国家范围内进行。样本量通常较小(中位数=每个职业 220 名参与者),135 项研究(69%)存在较高的偏倚风险。23 个主要 SOC 职业群体中有 21 个群体有一个或多个估计值,但已确定的估计值中有一半以上(n=359/600)是与医疗保健相关的职业。“个人护理和服务职业”(中位数 22%(IQR 9-28%);n=14)的血清流行率最高。

结论

在大流行的第一年,发表了许多涵盖广泛职业的血清流行率研究。结果表明,不同职业之间的血清流行率存在相当大的差异,尽管进行了少数高质量的大型研究。需要进行精心设计的研究,以提高我们对 SARS-CoV-2 职业风险的认识,并应将其视为未来呼吸道病原体大流行防范的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d66/9979591/68a225ed1e9d/bmjopen-2022-063771f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d66/9979591/40369b2a19d3/bmjopen-2022-063771f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d66/9979591/68a225ed1e9d/bmjopen-2022-063771f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d66/9979591/40369b2a19d3/bmjopen-2022-063771f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d66/9979591/68a225ed1e9d/bmjopen-2022-063771f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence studies: a systematic review.职业与 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率研究:系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 28;13(2):e063771. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063771.
2
SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence in the general population and high-risk occupational groups across 18 cities in Iran: a population-based cross-sectional study.伊朗 18 个城市一般人群和高风险职业人群中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清流行率:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;21(4):473-481. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30858-6. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
3
Systematic review of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and appraisal of evidence, prior to the widespread introduction of vaccine programmes in the WHO European Region, January-December 2020.2020 年 1 月至 12 月,在世界卫生组织欧洲区域广泛推出疫苗接种计划之前,对 SARS-CoV-2 抗体血清流行率进行系统评价,并对证据进行评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 6;13(11):e064240. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064240.
4
Importance of occupation for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and COVID-19 vaccination among correctional workers in Quebec, Canada: A cross-sectional study.重要的职业为 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率和 COVID-19 疫苗接种在魁北克省的监狱工作人员在加拿大:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;10:1021871. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1021871. eCollection 2022.
5
SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of standardised seroprevalence studies, from January 2020 to December 2021.非洲的 SARS-CoV-2 感染:2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月标准化血清流行率研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008793.
6
Update on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: regional and worldwide.关于 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率的最新信息:地区和全球。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1762-1771. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Estimated SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in US Patients Receiving Dialysis 1 Year After the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19 大流行开始一年后接受透析的美国患者中估计的 SARS-CoV-2 血清流行率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116572. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16572.
9
Demographic and occupational determinants of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity in hospital staff.医院员工抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 血清阳性的人口统计学和职业决定因素。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):234-245. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa199.
10
Evaluating the association between in-person work and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection through June 2021.评估 2021 年 6 月之前现场工作与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险之间的关联。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Mar;66(3):222-232. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23458. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among essential workers in long term care and retirement homes in Ontario, Canada: A descriptive cross-sectional study.加拿大安大略省长期护理机构和养老院一线工作人员中新冠病毒2型血清阳性模式:一项描述性横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 28;5(3):e0004294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004294. eCollection 2025.
2
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review.职业与 SARS-CoV-2 在欧洲:综述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 18;33(173). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0044-2024. Print 2024 Jul.
3
SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence by industry, workplace characteristics, and workplace infection prevention and control measures, North Carolina, USA, 2021 to 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Adapting Serosurveys for the SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Era.适应新冠病毒疫苗时代的血清学调查。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 23;9(2):ofab632. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab632. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Occupational risk of COVID-19 in the first versus second epidemic wave in Norway, 2020.2020 年挪威第一波与第二波疫情期间的 COVID-19 职业风险。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Oct;26(40). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.40.2001875.
3
Global seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体的全球血清流行率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
2021 年至 2022 年美国北卡罗来纳州按行业、工作场所特征和工作场所感染预防控制措施划分的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体流行率。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Sep 27;68(8):881-889. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae067.
4
Occupation and COVID-19: Lessons From the Pandemic.职业与 COVID-19:大流行带来的教训。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Aug;12(8):1997-2007.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.022. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
5
Education and pandemic SARS-CoV-2 infections in the German working population - the mediating role of working from home.教育程度与德国劳动人口中 SARS-CoV-2 感染-居家办公的中介作用。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Apr 1;50(3):168-177. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4144. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0252617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252617. eCollection 2021.
4
Occupational differences in COVID-19 incidence, severity, and mortality in the United Kingdom: Available data and framework for analyses.英国新冠肺炎发病率、严重程度和死亡率的职业差异:现有数据及分析框架
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Jan 13;6:102. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16729.2. eCollection 2021.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants.职业与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎风险:对120075名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 9;78(5):307-14. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731.
7
Persistence of serum and saliva antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens in COVID-19 patients.COVID-19 患者血清和唾液中针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突抗原的抗体反应持续存在。
Sci Immunol. 2020 Oct 8;5(52). doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abe5511.
8
Occupational factors in the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: compensation claims applications support establishing an occupational surveillance system.意大利 COVID-19 大流行中的职业因素:赔偿申请支持建立职业监测系统。
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec;77(12):818-821. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106844. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
9
Location Matters: Geographic Disparities and Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019.地点很重要:2019 年冠状病毒病的地理差异和影响。
J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 13;222(12):1951-1954. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa583.
10
Fighting the COVID-19 pandemic: onsite mass workplace testing for COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea.抗击新冠疫情:韩国工作场所新冠病毒现场大规模检测
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jul 2;32:e22. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e22. eCollection 2020.