• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding user responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter from a terror management theory perspective: Cultural differences among the US, UK and India.从恐惧管理理论视角理解推特用户对新冠疫情的反应:美国、英国和印度之间的文化差异
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Temporal and Emotional Variations in People's Perceptions of Mass Epidemic Infectious Disease After the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Influenza A as an Example: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis Based on Weibo Data.基于微博数据的主题建模和情感分析:以甲型流感为例探讨 COVID-19 大流行后人们对大规模传染病的时间和情感变化
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 2;25:e49300. doi: 10.2196/49300.
3
Terror Management Theory and the COVID-19 Pandemic.恐惧管理理论与新冠疫情
J Humanist Psychol. 2021 Mar;61(2):173-189. doi: 10.1177/0022167820959488.
4
Understanding terror states of online users in the context of COVID-19: An application of Terror Management Theory.在新冠疫情背景下理解网络用户的恐惧状态:恐怖管理理论的应用
Comput Human Behav. 2021 Dec;125:106967. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106967. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.
6
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
7
Understanding the Public Discussion About the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Twitter Data: Text Mining Analysis Study.利用推特数据理解 COVID-19 大流行期间公众对疾病控制与预防中心的讨论:文本挖掘分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e25108. doi: 10.2196/25108.
8
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
9
Twitter Mediated Sociopolitical Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in India.印度新冠疫情危机期间推特介导的社会政治传播
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 24;12:784907. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784907. eCollection 2021.
10
Emotions and Topics Expressed on Twitter During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom: Comparative Geolocation and Text Mining Analysis.在英国 COVID-19 大流行期间在 Twitter 上表达的情绪和主题:比较地理定位和文本挖掘分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e40323. doi: 10.2196/40323.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of COVID-19 on Residents' Dietary Behaviors: Observational Study.利用社交媒体数据了解 COVID-19 对居民饮食行为的影响:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 23;27:e51638. doi: 10.2196/51638.
2
Coping with mortality salience: the role of connection thinking and afterlife beliefs in Chinese context.应对死亡突显:联结思维与来世信念在中国背景下的作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 22;14:1190906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190906. eCollection 2023.
3
Mapping the sociodemographic distribution and self-reported justifications for non-compliance with COVID-19 guidelines in the United Kingdom.绘制英国新冠疫情防控指南不遵守情况的社会人口分布及自我报告的理由
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1183789. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183789. eCollection 2023.
4
Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory.并非如此可怕?一组恐怖管理理论的死亡凸显效应的复制失败。
PLoS One. 2023 May 9;18(5):e0285267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285267. eCollection 2023.
5
Examining thematic and emotional differences across Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube: The case of COVID-19 vaccine side effects.审视推特、红迪网和优兔上的主题和情感差异:以新冠疫苗副作用为例。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107734. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
The effect of COVID-19 risk perception on pro-environmental behavior of Chinese consumers: Perspectives from affective event theory.新冠疫情风险认知对中国消费者环保行为的影响:基于情感事件理论的视角
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 4;13:1093999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093999. eCollection 2022.
7
"It's been a double-edged sword": An online qualitative exploration of the impact of COVID-19 on individuals with spinal cord injury in the US with comparisons to previous UK findings.“这是一把双刃剑”:一项针对美国脊髓损伤患者的 COVID-19 影响的在线定性探索,与之前英国的发现进行了比较。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jan;47(1):51-63. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2129164. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Tracking the Impact of COVID-19 and Lockdown Policies on Public Mental Health Using Social Media: Infoveillance Study.利用社交媒体追踪 COVID-19 和封锁政策对公众心理健康的影响:信息监测研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 13;24(10):e39676. doi: 10.2196/39676.
9
Moral expressions, sources, and frames: Examining COVID-19 vaccination posts by facebook public pages.道德表达、来源与框架:通过脸书公共页面审视新冠疫苗接种相关帖子
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jan;138:107479. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107479. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
10
Tweets Related to Motivation and Physical Activity for Obesity-Related Behavior Change: Descriptive Analysis.与肥胖相关行为改变的动机和身体活动相关的推文:描述性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jul 20;24(7):e15055. doi: 10.2196/15055.

本文引用的文献

1
Terror Management Theory and the COVID-19 Pandemic.恐惧管理理论与新冠疫情
J Humanist Psychol. 2021 Mar;61(2):173-189. doi: 10.1177/0022167820959488.
2
Don't get it or don't spread it: comparing self-interested versus prosocial motivations for COVID-19 prevention behaviors.勿受感染或勿传播:比较对 COVID-19 预防行为的自利动机与亲社会动机。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 12;11(1):20222. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97617-5.
3
'It's like being in a war with an invisible enemy': A document analysis of bereavement due to COVID-19 in UK newspapers.“这就像是在与一个无形的敌人作战”:对英国报纸上关于新冠疫情导致的丧亲之痛的文献分析
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247904. eCollection 2021.
4
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
5
Public Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.公众对 Twitter 上 COVID-19 大流行的看法:情感分析和主题建模研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 11;6(4):e21978. doi: 10.2196/21978.
6
Topics, Trends, and Sentiments of Tweets About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Temporal Infoveillance Study.关于新冠疫情的推文主题、趋势和情绪:时间信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 23;22(10):e22624. doi: 10.2196/22624.
7
Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic.两极分化与公共卫生:新冠疫情期间社会 distancing 方面的党派差异。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但原文中该词似乎有误,可能是“social distancing measures”之类表述会更准确,直接翻译的话就是“社会距离” )
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
The contagion of mortality: A terror management health model for pandemics.死亡传染:大流行病的恐惧管理健康模型。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):607-617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12392. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
10
World leaders' usage of Twitter in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a content analysis.世界各国领导人在应对 COVID-19 大流行时对 Twitter 的使用:内容分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):510-516. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa049.

从恐惧管理理论视角理解推特用户对新冠疫情的反应:美国、英国和印度之间的文化差异

Understanding user responses to the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter from a terror management theory perspective: Cultural differences among the US, UK and India.

作者信息

Kwon Soyeon, Park Albert

机构信息

Division of Digital Business, College of Global Business, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro., Sejong, 30019, South Korea.

Department of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, UNC Charlotte, Woodward 310H, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.

出版信息

Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087
PMID:34744298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8558263/
Abstract

This study uses a new approach to understand people's varied responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Heightened media coverage and surging death tolls undoubtedly increase individuals' death-related thoughts. Thus, this study draws on terror management theory to analyze the general public's reactions during which mortality is salient. Twitter data were collected from three countries-the US, the UK, and India. Topic modeling analysis using Latent Dirichlet Allocation identified a total of seven themes reflecting two types of defenses: proximal defenses and distal defenses. Proximal defenses included calls for behavioral changes in response to COVID-19. Distal defenses included searching for meaning, political polarization and government incompetence, racial division, and sharing up-to-date information. During a prolonged crisis, anxiety-buffering systems can be undermined and lead to either maladaptive defenses (i.e., psychological distress) or new forms of defenses (i.e., adjusting to the new normal). The analysis highlights cultural differences in defenses across the three countries. Theoretical and practical implications for public health practitioners and social media platform managers are then discussed.

摘要

本研究采用一种新方法来理解人们对新冠疫情的不同反应。媒体报道的增加和死亡人数的激增无疑会增加个人与死亡相关的想法。因此,本研究借鉴恐惧管理理论来分析在死亡率显著的情况下公众的反应。推特数据收集自美国、英国和印度这三个国家。使用潜在狄利克雷分配的主题建模分析共识别出七个主题,反映了两种防御类型:近端防御和远端防御。近端防御包括呼吁针对新冠疫情改变行为。远端防御包括寻找意义、政治两极分化和政府无能、种族分裂以及分享最新信息。在长期危机期间,焦虑缓冲系统可能会受到破坏,导致适应不良的防御(即心理困扰)或新的防御形式(即适应新常态)。该分析突出了这三个国家在防御方面的文化差异。随后讨论了对公共卫生从业者和社交媒体平台管理者的理论及实际意义。