Kwon Soyeon, Park Albert
Division of Digital Business, College of Global Business, Korea University, 2511 Sejong-ro., Sejong, 30019, South Korea.
Department of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, UNC Charlotte, Woodward 310H, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA.
Comput Human Behav. 2022 Mar;128:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107087. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
This study uses a new approach to understand people's varied responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Heightened media coverage and surging death tolls undoubtedly increase individuals' death-related thoughts. Thus, this study draws on terror management theory to analyze the general public's reactions during which mortality is salient. Twitter data were collected from three countries-the US, the UK, and India. Topic modeling analysis using Latent Dirichlet Allocation identified a total of seven themes reflecting two types of defenses: proximal defenses and distal defenses. Proximal defenses included calls for behavioral changes in response to COVID-19. Distal defenses included searching for meaning, political polarization and government incompetence, racial division, and sharing up-to-date information. During a prolonged crisis, anxiety-buffering systems can be undermined and lead to either maladaptive defenses (i.e., psychological distress) or new forms of defenses (i.e., adjusting to the new normal). The analysis highlights cultural differences in defenses across the three countries. Theoretical and practical implications for public health practitioners and social media platform managers are then discussed.
本研究采用一种新方法来理解人们对新冠疫情的不同反应。媒体报道的增加和死亡人数的激增无疑会增加个人与死亡相关的想法。因此,本研究借鉴恐惧管理理论来分析在死亡率显著的情况下公众的反应。推特数据收集自美国、英国和印度这三个国家。使用潜在狄利克雷分配的主题建模分析共识别出七个主题,反映了两种防御类型:近端防御和远端防御。近端防御包括呼吁针对新冠疫情改变行为。远端防御包括寻找意义、政治两极分化和政府无能、种族分裂以及分享最新信息。在长期危机期间,焦虑缓冲系统可能会受到破坏,导致适应不良的防御(即心理困扰)或新的防御形式(即适应新常态)。该分析突出了这三个国家在防御方面的文化差异。随后讨论了对公共卫生从业者和社交媒体平台管理者的理论及实际意义。