Fernandes Aléxia, Afonso José, Noronha Francisco, Mezêncio Bruno, Vilas-Boas João Paulo, Fernandes Ricardo J
Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport and Porto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-030, Brazil.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;10(3):308. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10030308.
Intracycle velocity variation is a swimming relevant research topic, focusing on understanding the interaction between hydrodynamic propulsive and drag forces. We have performed a systematic scoping review to map the main concepts, sources and types of evidence accomplished. Searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, as well as the Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Symposia Proceedings Book, with manual searches, snowballing citation tracking, and external experts consultation. The eligibility criteria included competitive swimmers' intracycle velocity variation assessment of any sex, distance, pace, swimming technique and protocol. Studies' characteristics were summarized and expressed in an evidence gap map, and the risk of bias was judged using RoBANS. A total of 76 studies, corresponding to 68 trials involving 1440 swimmers (55.2 and 34.1% males and females), were included, with only 20 (29.4%) presenting an overall low risk of bias. The front crawl was the most studied swimming technique and intracycle velocity variation was assessed and quantified in several ways, leading to extremely divergent results. Researchers related intracycle velocity variation to coordination, energy cost, fatigue, technical proficiency, velocity, swimming techniques variants and force. Future studies should focus on studying backstroke, breaststroke and butterfly at high intensities, in young, youth and world-class swimmers, as well as in IVV quantification.
周期内速度变化是一个与游泳相关的研究主题,重点在于理解水动力推进力和阻力之间的相互作用。我们进行了一项系统的范围综述,以梳理已完成的主要概念、证据来源和类型。检索了PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,以及《游泳生物力学与医学研讨会论文集》,并进行了手动检索、滚雪球式引文跟踪和咨询外部专家。纳入标准包括对任何性别、距离、速度、游泳技术和方案的竞技游泳运动员的周期内速度变化评估。研究特征在证据差距图中进行了总结和呈现,并使用RoBANS判断偏倚风险。共纳入76项研究,对应68项试验,涉及1440名游泳运动员(男性和女性分别占55.2%和34.1%),只有20项(29.4%)总体偏倚风险较低。自由泳是研究最多的游泳技术,周期内速度变化通过多种方式进行了评估和量化,结果差异极大。研究人员将周期内速度变化与协调性、能量消耗、疲劳、技术熟练程度、速度、游泳技术变体和力量联系起来。未来的研究应聚焦于高强度下对仰泳、蛙泳和蝶泳的研究,研究对象包括青少年和世界级游泳运动员,以及周期内速度变化的量化研究。