• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工神经网络在计算认知模型中的模型识别和参数估计中的应用。

Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 15;20(5):e1012119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012119. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012119
PMID:38748770
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11132492/
Abstract

Computational cognitive models have been used extensively to formalize cognitive processes. Model parameters offer a simple way to quantify individual differences in how humans process information. Similarly, model comparison allows researchers to identify which theories, embedded in different models, provide the best accounts of the data. Cognitive modeling uses statistical tools to quantitatively relate models to data that often rely on computing/estimating the likelihood of the data under the model. However, this likelihood is computationally intractable for a substantial number of models. These relevant models may embody reasonable theories of cognition, but are often under-explored due to the limited range of tools available to relate them to data. We contribute to filling this gap in a simple way using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to map data directly onto model identity and parameters, bypassing the likelihood estimation. We test our instantiation of an ANN as a cognitive model fitting tool on classes of cognitive models with strong inter-trial dependencies (such as reinforcement learning models), which offer unique challenges to most methods. We show that we can adequately perform both parameter estimation and model identification using our ANN approach, including for models that cannot be fit using traditional likelihood-based methods. We further discuss our work in the context of the ongoing research leveraging simulation-based approaches to parameter estimation and model identification, and how these approaches broaden the class of cognitive models researchers can quantitatively investigate.

摘要

计算认知模型被广泛用于形式化认知过程。模型参数为量化人类信息处理个体差异提供了一种简单的方法。同样,模型比较允许研究人员确定哪些理论,嵌入在不同的模型中,为数据提供了最佳解释。认知建模使用统计工具将模型与数据定量关联,而这些数据通常依赖于计算/估计模型下数据的可能性。然而,对于大量模型来说,这种可能性在计算上是难以处理的。这些相关模型可能体现了合理的认知理论,但由于可用于将它们与数据相关联的工具有限,往往没有得到充分探索。我们通过使用人工神经网络 (ANN) 以简单的方式解决了这一差距,该方法直接将数据映射到模型身份和参数上,从而绕过了可能性估计。我们在具有强试验间依赖性的认知模型类别(例如强化学习模型)上测试了我们的 ANN 作为认知模型拟合工具的实例,这些模型对大多数方法提出了独特的挑战。我们表明,我们可以使用我们的 ANN 方法充分进行参数估计和模型识别,包括那些无法使用传统基于似然的方法拟合的模型。我们进一步讨论了我们在利用基于模拟的方法进行参数估计和模型识别的研究背景下的工作,以及这些方法如何拓宽研究人员可以进行定量研究的认知模型类别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/6d4d9ca828b2/pcbi.1012119.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/7ac57d1ca175/pcbi.1012119.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/76f58ac98858/pcbi.1012119.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/1704b8b896a7/pcbi.1012119.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/f8819eab49e1/pcbi.1012119.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/d5d58ae8c25d/pcbi.1012119.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/6d4d9ca828b2/pcbi.1012119.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/7ac57d1ca175/pcbi.1012119.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/76f58ac98858/pcbi.1012119.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/1704b8b896a7/pcbi.1012119.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/f8819eab49e1/pcbi.1012119.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/d5d58ae8c25d/pcbi.1012119.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9909/11132492/6d4d9ca828b2/pcbi.1012119.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models.人工神经网络在计算认知模型中的模型识别和参数估计中的应用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 15;20(5):e1012119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012119. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Artificial neural networks for model identification and parameter estimation in computational cognitive models.用于计算认知模型中模型识别和参数估计的人工神经网络。
bioRxiv. 2024 Apr 2:2023.09.14.557793. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.14.557793.
3
Likelihood approximation networks (LANs) for fast inference of simulation models in cognitive neuroscience.用于认知神经科学中模拟模型快速推断的似然逼近网络 (LANs)。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e65074. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65074.
4
Missing data in amortized simulation-based neural posterior estimation.基于摊销模拟的神经后验估计中的缺失数据。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jun 17;20(6):e1012184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012184. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Reliable and efficient parameter estimation using approximate continuum limit descriptions of stochastic models.利用随机模型的近似连续极限描述进行可靠和高效的参数估计。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Sep 21;549:111201. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111201. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
Rethinking the performance comparison between SNNS and ANNS.重新思考 SNNS 和 ANNS 的性能比较。
Neural Netw. 2020 Jan;121:294-307. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
A parameter estimation method for chromatographic separation process based on physics-informed neural network.基于物理信息神经网络的色谱分离过程参数估计方法。
J Chromatogr A. 2024 Aug 16;1730:465077. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465077. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Construction and Supervised Learning of Long-Term Grey Cognitive Networks.长期灰色认知网络的构建与有监督学习。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2021 Feb;51(2):686-695. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2913960. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Statistical inference for assessing functional connectivity of neuronal ensembles with sparse spiking data.基于稀疏放电数据评估神经元集合功能连接的统计推断。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Apr;19(2):121-35. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2086079. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
10
Estimation of Granger causality through Artificial Neural Networks: applications to physiological systems and chaotic electronic oscillators.通过人工神经网络估计格兰杰因果关系:在生理系统和混沌电子振荡器中的应用。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 May 18;7:e429. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.429. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Latent variable sequence identification for cognitive models with neural network estimators.使用神经网络估计器的认知模型的潜在变量序列识别
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 28;57(10):272. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02794-0.
2
Comparing likelihood-based and likelihood-free approaches to fitting and comparing models of intertemporal choice.比较基于似然性和无似然性的方法来拟合和比较跨期选择模型。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 11;57(9):252. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02779-z.
3
Bridging theory and data: A computational workflow for cultural evolution.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the flexibility of neural networks to predict dynamic theoretical parameters underlying human choice behavior.利用神经网络的灵活性来预测人类选择行为背后的动态理论参数。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Jan 4;20(1):e1011678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011678. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Age-related differences in prefrontal glutamate are associated with increased working memory decay that gives the appearance of learning deficits.与工作记忆衰退相关的额前叶谷氨酸的年龄相关差异,表现出学习缺陷的表象。
Elife. 2023 Apr 18;12:e85243. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85243.
3
Troubleshooting Bayesian cognitive models.
连接理论与数据:文化进化的计算工作流程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2322887121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322887121. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
The Tweedledum and Tweedledee of dynamic decisions: Discriminating between diffusion decision and accumulator models.动态决策中的半斤八两:区分扩散决策模型和累加器模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Apr;32(2):588-613. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02587-0. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
5
Language models outperform cloze predictability in a cognitive model of reading.语言模型在阅读认知模型中优于完形预测能力。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 25;20(9):e1012117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012117. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
phyddle: software for exploring phylogenetic models with deep learning.Phyddle:用于通过深度学习探索系统发育模型的软件。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 28:2024.08.06.606717. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.06.606717.
7
Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.主动强化学习与动作偏差和滞后的比较:混合专家与非专家的控制。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Mar 29;20(3):e1011950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950. eCollection 2024 Mar.
贝叶斯认知模型故障排除
Psychol Methods. 2025 Feb;30(1):128-154. doi: 10.1037/met0000554. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
The effects of induced positive and negative affect on Pavlovian-instrumental interactions.诱发正性和负性情绪对巴甫洛夫-工具性相互作用的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Nov;36(7):1343-1360. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2109600. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
5
Flexible and efficient simulation-based inference for models of decision-making.基于模拟的灵活高效推理在决策模型中的应用。
Elife. 2022 Jul 27;11:e77220. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77220.
6
Flexibility in valenced reinforcement learning computations across development.发展过程中强化学习计算的灵活性。
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1601-1615. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13791. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Reinforcement learning and Bayesian inference provide complementary models for the unique advantage of adolescents in stochastic reversal.强化学习和贝叶斯推断为青少年在随机反转中的独特优势提供了互补的模型。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jun;55:101106. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101106. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Mice exhibit stochastic and efficient action switching during probabilistic decision making.在进行概率决策时,老鼠表现出随机且有效的动作转换。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113961119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113961119. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Impulsivity Relates to Multi-Trial Choice Strategy in Probabilistic Reversal Learning.冲动性与概率性反转学习中的多试验选择策略有关。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 14;13:800290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.800290. eCollection 2022.
10
Complex cognitive algorithms preserved by selective social learning in experimental populations.实验种群中通过选择性社会学习保留的复杂认知算法。
Science. 2022 Apr;376(6588):95-98. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0915. Epub 2022 Mar 31.