Ryntathiang Iadalin, Behera Archana, Richard Titus, Dharmalingam Jothinathan Mukesh Kumar
Centre for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IND.
Department of English, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 26;16(4):e59112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59112. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Objective This study aimed to synthesize cobalt nanoparticles (CoNPs) via the green synthesis method using , leaf (MPL), flower (BMF), and flower (MIF) as eco-friendly reducing agents. It further aimed to compare the effectiveness of these plant extracts in CoNPs production and evaluate the antioxidant activities of the synthesized nanoparticles (NPs), establishing a link between the phytochemical constituents of the extracts and the antioxidant capacity of CoNPs for potential applications in drug development and environmental sustainability. Materials and methods CoNPs were synthesized using aqueous extracts of MPL, BMF, and MIF. These extracts act as stabilizing and self-reducing agents. Initially, the presence of CoNPs was detected visually by observing a color change. To confirm this observation, UV-visible spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were employed. UV-visible spectroscopy helps in analyzing the absorption of light by the CoNPs, while FTIR spectroscopy is used to identify the functional groups present in the NPs. Subsequently, the antioxidant activity of the synthesized CoNPs was assessed using the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl hydroxyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging assay. This assay measures the ability of antioxidants to neutralize free radicals by determining the reduction in the DPPH radical's absorption. To ensure the reliability of the results, the experiments were conducted in triplicate. Statistical analysis was then performed to compare the antioxidant effectiveness of the different plant extracts used in synthesizing the CoNPs. This analysis helps in determining any significant differences in antioxidant activity among the extracts. Results UV-visible spectral analysis confirmed the successful synthesis of CoNPs, revealing characteristic absorption peaks. For leaf extract (MPLE), the maximum peak was observed at ~272 nm, while flower extract (BMFE) exhibited a peak at ~276 nm, and flower extract (MIFE) revealed a maximum peak at ~320 nm. FTIR analysis further validated the presence of organic molecules from plant components on the outer layer of CoNPs, indicating successful capping and stabilization by phytochemicals from the extracts. The spectra displayed various peaks at different wavenumbers: MPLE showed prominent peaks at 3335 cm, BMFE showed distinct peaks at 3314 cm, and MIFE exhibited significant peaks at 3261 cm. Among the three types of CoNPs tested, those synthesized using MIFE exhibited the highest inhibition of 87.67% at a concentration of 60 µL. This higher inhibition was compared to those synthesized using BMFE and MPLE. This study suggests that the CoNPs synthesized on MIFE can serve as an antioxidant agent because of their remarkable free radical-scavenging activity. Conclusions The study highlights the potential of CoNPs synthesized using MIFE as they exhibited superior antioxidant activity compared to those synthesized with BMFE and MPLE. Therefore, the study underscores the promise of MIFE as a valuable natural resource for producing CoNPs abundant in antioxidants. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of implementing environmentally friendly synthesis techniques to produce nanomaterials that are both safe for the environment and biologically effective.
目的 本研究旨在通过绿色合成方法,使用[植物名称1]叶(MPL)、[植物名称2]花(BMF)和[植物名称3]花(MIF)作为环境友好型还原剂来合成钴纳米颗粒(CoNPs)。本研究还旨在比较这些植物提取物在CoNPs制备中的有效性,并评估合成纳米颗粒(NPs)的抗氧化活性,建立提取物的植物化学成分与CoNPs抗氧化能力之间的联系,以便在药物开发和环境可持续性方面进行潜在应用。
材料和方法 使用MPL、BMF和MIF的水提取物合成CoNPs。这些提取物充当稳定剂和自还原剂。最初,通过观察颜色变化肉眼检测CoNPs的存在。为了证实这一观察结果,采用了紫外可见光谱法和傅里叶变换红外(FTIR)光谱法。紫外可见光谱法有助于分析CoNPs对光的吸收,而FTIR光谱法则用于识别NPs中存在的官能团。随后,使用1,1 - 二苯基 - 2 - 苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除试验评估合成的CoNPs的抗氧化活性。该试验通过测定DPPH自由基吸收的降低来衡量抗氧化剂中和自由基的能力。为确保结果的可靠性,实验重复进行三次。然后进行统计分析,以比较用于合成CoNPs的不同植物提取物的抗氧化有效性。该分析有助于确定提取物之间抗氧化活性的任何显著差异。
结果 紫外可见光谱分析证实了CoNPs的成功合成,显示出特征吸收峰。对于[植物名称1]叶提取物(MPLE),在约272 nm处观察到最大峰,而[植物名称2]花提取物(BMFE)在约276 nm处出现峰,[植物名称3]花提取物(MIFE)在约320 nm处显示最大峰。FTIR分析进一步验证了CoNPs外层存在来自植物成分的有机分子,表明提取物中的植物化学物质成功地进行了封端和稳定化。光谱在不同波数处显示出各种峰:MPLE在3335 cm处显示出突出峰,BMFE在3314 cm处显示出明显峰,MIFE在3261 cm处显示出显著峰。在测试的三种类型的CoNPs中,使用MIFE合成的CoNPs在浓度为60 μL时表现出最高的抑制率87.67%。与使用BMFE和MPLE合成 的CoNPs相比,这种抑制率更高。本研究表明,由于其显著的自由基清除活性,使用MIFE合成的CoNPs可以用作抗氧化剂。
结论 该研究突出了使用MIFE合成的CoNPs的潜力,因为它们与使用BMFE和MPLE合成的CoNPs相比表现出优异的抗氧化活性。因此,该研究强调了MIFE作为生产富含抗氧化剂的CoNPs的宝贵自然资源的前景。此外,它强调了采用环境友好型合成技术生产对环境安全且具有生物有效性的纳米材料的重要性。