Zheng Zhiye, Liu Taoli, Chai Nan, Zeng Dongchang, Zhang Ruixiang, Wu Yang, Hang Jiaxuan, Liu Yuxin, Deng Qindi, Tan Jiantao, Liu Jialin, Xie Xianrong, Liu Yao-Guang, Zhu Qinlong
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, College of Agriculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Landscape Resources Conservation and Sustainable Utilization in Lijiang River Basin, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.
Plant Biotechnol J. 2024 Nov;22(11):3164-3174. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14438. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
Dual base editors (DBEs) enable simultaneous A-to-G and C-to-T conversions, expanding mutation types. However, low editing efficiency and narrow targeting range limit the widespread use of DBEs in plants. The single-strand DNA binding domain of RAD51 DBD can be fused to base editors to improve their editing efficiency. However, it remains unclear how the DBD affects dual base editing performance in plants. In this study, we generated a series of novel plant DBE-SpGn tools consisting of nine constructs using the high-activity cytidine deaminase evoFERNY, adenosine deaminase TadA8e and DBD in various fusion modes with the PAM-flexible Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) nickase variant SpGn (with NG-PAM). By analysing their editing performance on 48 targets in rice, we found that DBE-SpGn constructs containing a single DBD and deaminases located at the N-terminus of SpGn exhibited the highest editing efficiencies. Meanwhile, constructs with deaminases located at the C-terminus and/or multiple DBDs failed to function normally and exhibited inhibited editing activity. We identified three particularly high-efficiency dual base editors (C-A-SpGn, C-A-D-SpGn and A-C-D-SpGn), named PhieDBEs (Plant high-efficiency dual base editors), capable of producing efficient dual base conversions within a narrow editing window (M ~ M, M = A/C). The editing efficiency of C-A-D-SpGn was as high as 95.2% at certain target sites, with frequencies of simultaneous C-to-T and A-to-G conversions as high as 81.0%. In summary, PhieDBEs (especially C-A-D-SpGn) can produce diverse mutants and may prove useful in a wide variety of applications, including plant functional genomics, precise mutagenesis, directed evolution and crop genetic improvement, among others.
双碱基编辑器(DBEs)能够同时实现A到G和C到T的转换,从而扩展了突变类型。然而,低编辑效率和狭窄的靶向范围限制了DBEs在植物中的广泛应用。RAD51 DBD的单链DNA结合结构域可以与碱基编辑器融合以提高其编辑效率。然而,DBD如何影响植物中的双碱基编辑性能仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用高活性胞苷脱氨酶evoFERNY、腺苷脱氨酶TadA8e和DBD,以各种融合模式与PAM灵活的化脓性链球菌Cas9(SpCas9)切口酶变体SpGn(具有NG-PAM)构建了一系列由九个构建体组成的新型植物DBE-SpGn工具。通过分析它们对水稻中48个靶点的编辑性能,我们发现含有单个DBD且脱氨酶位于SpGn N端的DBE-SpGn构建体表现出最高的编辑效率。同时,脱氨酶位于C端和/或多个DBD的构建体不能正常发挥作用,并表现出受抑制的编辑活性。我们鉴定出三种特别高效的双碱基编辑器(C-A-SpGn、C-A-D-SpGn和A-C-D-SpGn),命名为PhieDBEs(植物高效双碱基编辑器),它们能够在狭窄的编辑窗口(M~M,M = A/C)内实现高效的双碱基转换。在某些靶点处,C-A-D-SpGn的编辑效率高达95.2%,同时C到T和A到G转换的频率高达81.0%。总之,PhieDBEs(尤其是C-A-D-SpGn)可以产生多种突变体,并且可能在包括植物功能基因组学、精确诱变、定向进化和作物遗传改良等在内的广泛应用中发挥作用。