• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子健康干预措施在管理老年人多种生活方式风险行为方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Assessing the Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions to Manage Multiple Lifestyle Risk Behaviors Among Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

School of Physical Education, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 31;26:e58174. doi: 10.2196/58174.

DOI:10.2196/58174
PMID:39083787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325121/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developing adverse lifestyle behaviors increases the risk of a variety of chronic age-related diseases, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, and Alzheimer disease. There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of eHealth-based multiple health behavior change (MHBC) interventions to manage lifestyle risk behaviors.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of eHealth MHBC interventions in changing ≥2 major lifestyle risk behaviors in people aged ≥50 years.

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in 6 electronic databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus-from inception to May 1, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of eHealth interventions targeting ≥2 of 6 behaviors of interest: alcohol use, smoking, diet, physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior, and sleep.

RESULTS

A total of 34 articles with 35 studies were included. eHealth-based MHBC interventions significantly increased smoking cessation rates (odds ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.62-2.70; P<.001), fruit intake (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.32; P=.01), vegetable intake (SMD 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.28; P=.003), self-reported total PA (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.02-0.43; P=.03), and objectively measured moderate to vigorous PA (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.41; P=.002); in addition, the interventions decreased fat intake (SMD -0.23, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.13; P<.001). No effects were observed for alcohol use, sedentary behavior, or sleep. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of the pooled results. Moreover, the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework.

CONCLUSIONS

eHealth-based MHBC interventions may be a promising strategy to increase PA, improve diet, and reduce smoking among older adults. However, the effect sizes were small. Further high-quality, older adult-oriented research is needed to develop eHealth interventions that can change multiple behaviors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42023444418; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023444418.

摘要

背景

养成不良生活方式会增加罹患多种与年龄相关的慢性疾病的风险,包括心血管疾病、肥胖和阿尔茨海默病。关于基于电子健康的多种健康行为改变(MHBC)干预措施在管理生活方式风险行为方面的有效性,证据有限。

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估针对≥50 岁人群的≥2 种主要生活方式风险行为的基于电子健康的 MHBC 干预措施的有效性。

方法

从 2024 年 5 月 1 日起,我们在 6 个电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆和 SPORTDiscus)中进行了文献检索。符合条件的研究是针对 6 种感兴趣行为中的≥2 种行为的电子健康干预措施的随机对照试验:饮酒、吸烟、饮食、身体活动(PA)、久坐行为和睡眠。

结果

共纳入 34 篇文章,涉及 35 项研究。基于电子健康的 MHBC 干预措施显著提高了戒烟率(比值比 2.09,95%置信区间 1.62-2.70;P<.001)、水果摄入量(标准化均数差[SMD]0.18,95%置信区间 0.04-0.32;P=.01)、蔬菜摄入量(SMD 0.17,95%置信区间 0.05-0.28;P=.003)、自我报告的总 PA(SMD 0.22,95%置信区间 0.02-0.43;P=.03)和客观测量的中等至剧烈 PA(SMD 0.25,95%置信区间 0.09-0.41;P=.002);此外,干预措施还降低了脂肪摄入量(SMD -0.23,95%置信区间 -0.33 至 -0.13;P<.001)。未观察到饮酒、久坐行为或睡眠方面的影响。进行了敏感性分析以测试汇总结果的稳健性。此外,使用 GRADE(评估、制定和评估推荐的分级)框架评估证据的确定性。

结论

基于电子健康的 MHBC 干预措施可能是一种增加老年人 PA、改善饮食和减少吸烟的有前途的策略。然而,效果大小较小。需要进一步开展面向老年人的高质量研究,以开发能够改变多种行为的电子健康干预措施。

试验注册

PROSPERO 国际前瞻性系统评价注册处 CRD42023444418;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023444418。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions to Manage Multiple Lifestyle Risk Behaviors Among Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估电子健康干预措施在管理老年人多种生活方式风险行为方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 31;26:e58174. doi: 10.2196/58174.
2
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Moderate-to-Vigorous Intensity Physical Activity Among Patients in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电子健康干预措施对心脏康复患者中中等至剧烈强度体力活动的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 29;25:e42845. doi: 10.2196/42845.
3
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions in the Control of Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients After a Coronary Event: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.移动医疗干预措施在控制冠心病事件后患者生活方式和心血管危险因素中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Dec 2;10(12):e39593. doi: 10.2196/39593.
4
Effectiveness of eHealth Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康戒烟干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e45111. doi: 10.2196/45111.
5
Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for promoting healthy behaviour or improving health outcomes.体育组织为促进健康行为或改善健康结果而实施的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1(1):CD012170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012170.pub2.
6
Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in Promoting Physical Activity Among College Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字健康干预措施在促进大学生身体活动方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e51714. doi: 10.2196/51714.
7
Blended Self-Management Interventions to Reduce Disease Burden in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.混合自我管理干预措施对降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘患者疾病负担的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 31;23(3):e24602. doi: 10.2196/24602.
8
Efficacy and External Validity of Electronic and Mobile Phone-Based Interventions Promoting Vegetable Intake in Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于电子设备和手机的干预措施对促进年轻人蔬菜摄入量的效果及外部效度:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 8;18(4):e58. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5082.
9
mHealth Interventions to Reduce Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.移动健康干预措施对减少儿童和青少年身体活动不足和久坐行为的影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 11;10(5):e35920. doi: 10.2196/35920.
10
Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Improving Medication Adherence Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康干预措施在提高心血管疾病患者药物依从性方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 15;26:e58013. doi: 10.2196/58013.

引用本文的文献

1
Social-Media-Based Mental Health Interventions: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.基于社交媒体的心理健康干预措施:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e67953. doi: 10.2196/67953.
2
Transforming daily support with multidisciplinary teleassistance: impact on health parameters in older adults-a randomized controlled trial.通过多学科远程协助改变日常支持:对老年人健康参数的影响——一项随机对照试验
Mhealth. 2025 Jul 14;11:30. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-24-72. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating Perceptions of the CANreduce 2.0 eHealth Intervention for Cannabis Use: Focus Group Study.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of medication adherence and management of risk factors for secondary prevention of stroke (MaMoRS) using a smartphone-based application.一项使用基于智能手机应用程序的药物依从性和二级预防中风危险因素管理(MaMoRS)的随机对照试验。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Jul;19(6):654-664. doi: 10.1177/17474930241245612. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Effectiveness of multiple health behavior change interventions in reducing symptoms of anxiety in the adult population: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.多种健康行为改变干预措施在减轻成年人群焦虑症状中的有效性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2024 Mar;180:107847. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107847. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
评估对CANreduce 2.0大麻使用电子健康干预措施的认知:焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 19;27:e65025. doi: 10.2196/65025.
Use of Biological Feedback as a Health Behavior Change Technique in Adults: Scoping Review.
生物反馈在成人健康行为改变技术中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 25;25:e44359. doi: 10.2196/44359.
4
The Effectiveness of Smartphone App-Based Interventions for Assisting Smoking Cessation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于智能手机应用程序的干预措施在协助戒烟方面的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 20;25:e43242. doi: 10.2196/43242.
5
The Effect of a mHealth App (KENPO-app) for Specific Health Guidance on Weight Changes in Adults With Obesity and Hypertension: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.KENPO 应用程序(mHealth 应用程序)对特定健康指导在肥胖和高血压成年人体重变化中的影响:试点随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Apr 12;11:e43236. doi: 10.2196/43236.
6
Health4Life eHealth intervention to modify multiple lifestyle risk behaviours among adolescent students in Australia: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.澳大利亚青少年学生中旨在改变多种生活方式风险行为的Health4Life电子健康干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 May;5(5):e276-e287. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00028-6. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
7
The effect of a game-based mobile app 'MyHeartMate' to promote lifestyle change in coronary disease patients: a randomized controlled trial.一款基于游戏的移动应用程序“MyHeartMate”对促进冠心病患者生活方式改变的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Nov 24;4(1):33-42. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac069. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Interventions Including Smart Technology Compared With Face-to-face Physical Activity Interventions in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.包含智能技术的干预措施与老年人面对面的身体活动干预措施的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 31;24(10):e36134. doi: 10.2196/36134.
9
Life's Essential 8: Updating and Enhancing the American Heart Association's Construct of Cardiovascular Health: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association.《生命的基础 8:更新和强化美国心脏协会心血管健康构建:美国心脏协会主席特别咨询报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Aug 2;146(5):e18-e43. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001078. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
10
Web-Based Versus Print-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Crossover Randomized Trial.基于网络的与基于印刷的社区居住老年人身体活动干预措施比较:交叉随机试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 23;10(3):e32212. doi: 10.2196/32212.