Suppr超能文献

非传统脂质参数作为尼泊尔女性心血管疾病风险的预测指标

Nontraditional Lipid Parameters as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Nepalese Women.

作者信息

Adhikaree Jasper, Shrestha Ruyusha, Bomjan Prabina, Pokharel Shreya, Shrestha Ashmita, Siwakoti Anusha, Acharya Rashila, Marzo Roy Rillera, Acharya Swosti, Pokhrel Ritesh, Rajbhandari Prachand Man Singh

机构信息

Department of Medical Biochemistry, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Gandaki, Nepal.

Department of Community Medicine, International Medical School, Management and Science University, Shah Alam, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Midlife Health. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):81-90. doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_179_23. Epub 2024 Jul 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of nontraditional lipid parameters for assessing clinical conditions is emerging; however, no study has identified thresholds for those parameters for the identification of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The present study aimed to establish the thresholds of nontraditional lipid parameters and test its ability to identify CVD risk factors.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study in women ( = 369, age: 46 ± 13 years, body mass index (BMI): 26.31 ± 2.54 kg/m) was conducted. Blood samples were collected and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TGs) were estimated. Subsequently, nontraditional lipid parameters were calculated, namely non-HDL-C, Castelli's Risk Index II (CRI-II), CRI-I, lipoprotein combined index (LCI), atherogenic index (AI), and AI of plasma (AIP).

RESULTS

Based on TC (≥200 mg/dL), the derived thresholds for non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, AI, and AIP were 139 mg/dL, 2.29, 3.689, 58,066, 2.687, and 0.487, respectively. Similarly, based on the threshold of TG (≥150 mg/dL), the derived thresholds for non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, AI, and AIP were 127 mg/dL, 2.3, 3.959, 58,251, 2.959, and 0.467, respectively. Out of considered five risk factors, non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, and AI thresholds were capable in identifying four risk factors (physical activity, blood pressure, BMI, and age) and AIP was able to associate with two risk factors at most (blood pressure and BMI).

CONCLUSION

The derived thresholds of nontraditional lipid parameters were capable of differentiating between CVD risk and nonrisk groups suggesting the possible use of these thresholds for studying CVD risk.

摘要

背景

使用非传统脂质参数评估临床状况的做法正在兴起;然而,尚无研究确定这些参数用于识别心血管疾病(CVD)风险的阈值。本研究旨在确定非传统脂质参数的阈值,并测试其识别CVD风险因素的能力。

方法

对女性(n = 369,年龄:46±13岁,体重指数(BMI):26.31±2.54 kg/m²)进行了一项横断面研究。采集血样并估算高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、总胆固醇(TC)和甘油三酯(TGs)。随后,计算非传统脂质参数,即非HDL-C、卡斯泰利风险指数II(CRI-II)、CRI-I、脂蛋白综合指数(LCI)、致动脉粥样硬化指数(AI)和血浆AI(AIP)。

结果

基于TC(≥200 mg/dL),非HDL-C、CRI-II、CRI-I、LCI、AI和AIP的推导阈值分别为139 mg/dL、2.29、3.689、58,066、2.687和0.487。同样,基于TG(≥150 mg/dL)的阈值,非HDL-C、CRI-II、CRI-I、LCI、AI和AIP的推导阈值分别为127 mg/dL、2.3、3.959、58,251、2.959和0.467。在所考虑的五个风险因素中,非HDL-C、CRI-II、CRI-I、LCI和AI阈值能够识别四个风险因素(身体活动、血压、BMI和年龄),而AIP最多能与两个风险因素(血压和BMI)相关联。

结论

推导得出的非传统脂质参数阈值能够区分CVD风险组和非风险组,表明这些阈值可能用于研究CVD风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84a7/11321523/68e89f8067e1/JMH-15-81-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验