Suppr超能文献

长时间实际骑行和实验室模拟骑行过程中的体温调节

Thermoregulation during prolonged actual and laboratory-simulated bicycling.

作者信息

Brown S L, Banister E W

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1985;54(1):125-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00426312.

Abstract

Thermoregulatory and cardiorespiratory responses to bicycling 55 km (mean speed 9.7 m X s-1) outdoors (15 degrees C DB) were compared to equivalent cycle ergometry (90 min at 65% VO2max) in the laboratory (20-23 degrees C DB, 50% RH) in 7 trained cyclists. Outdoor environmental conditions were simulated with fans and lamps, and were contrasted with standard no-wind, no-sun laboratory conditions. Sweating rate was similar during outdoor and laboratory simulated outdoor cycling (0.90 and 0.87 to 0.94 1 X h-1 respectively). During outdoor bicycling, mean heart rate (161 bt X min-1) was 7-13% higher (p less than .05) than under laboratory conditions, suggesting a greater strain for a similar external work rate. The increase in rectal temperature (0.8 degrees C) was 33-50% less (p less than 0.05) at the cooler outdoor ambient temperature than in the laboratory. Thermoregulatory stress was greater under the no-fan, no-lamp laboratory condition than during simulated outdoor conditions (36-38% greater (p less than 0.05) sweating rate, 15-18% greater (p less than 0.01) mean skin temperature, 6.4 to 7.8 fold greater (p less than 0.01) amount of clothing-retrained sweat). The cooling wind encountered in actual road bicycling apparently reduces thermoregulatory and circulatory demands compared with stationary cycle ergometry indoors. Failure to account for this enhanced cooling may result in overestimation of the physiological stress of actual road cycling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对7名训练有素的自行车运动员在户外(干球温度15摄氏度)骑行55公里(平均速度9.7米/秒)时的体温调节和心肺反应,与在实验室(干球温度20 - 23摄氏度,相对湿度50%)进行同等强度的自行车测力计测试(90分钟,65%最大摄氧量)进行了比较。通过风扇和灯模拟户外环境条件,并与标准的无风、无阳光的实验室条件进行对比。户外骑行和实验室模拟户外骑行时的出汗率相似(分别为0.90和0.87至0.94升/小时)。在户外骑行时,平均心率(161次/分钟)比实验室条件下高7 - 13%(p < 0.05),这表明在相似的外部工作强度下,户外骑行的压力更大。在较凉爽的户外环境温度下,直肠温度的升高(0.8摄氏度)比实验室中少33 - 50%(p < 0.05)。在无风扇、无灯的实验室条件下,体温调节压力比模拟户外条件时更大(出汗率高36 - 38%(p < 0.05),平均皮肤温度高15 - 18%(p < 0.01),衣物保留汗液量高6.4至7.8倍(p < 0.01))。与室内固定的自行车测力计测试相比,实际道路骑行中遇到的冷风显然降低了体温调节和循环需求。未能考虑到这种增强的冷却作用可能会导致对实际道路骑行生理压力的高估。(摘要截选至250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验