McCarthy L R, Senne J E
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Mar;11(3):281-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.281-285.1980.
A pH 4.0 buffered solution of the fluorochrome acridine orange was used to stain samples of 2,704 blood cultures that failed to yield visible evidence of growth after 1 day of incubation. Results obtained by the staining method were compared with those obtained by aerobic and anaerobic subcultures simultaneously performed upon the same cultures. Of the 109 culture-positive blood specimens initially detected by the acridine orange and the subculture methods, 85 (78%) were detected by both acridine orange and subcultures techniques, 14 (12.8%) were detected by subculture alone, and 10 (9.2%) were detected by acridine orange alone. The differences between the subculture and acridine orange methods were not found to be statistically significant (P less than 0.1). The acridine orange method represents a rapid and inexpensive alternative to conventional subculture techniques for the detection of bacteria in blood cultures that fail to yield visible evidence of growth after 1 day of incubation.
使用pH 4.0的荧光染料吖啶橙缓冲溶液对2704份血培养样本进行染色,这些样本在孵育1天后未产生可见生长迹象。将染色法获得的结果与对相同培养物同时进行的需氧和厌氧亚培养获得的结果进行比较。在最初通过吖啶橙和亚培养法检测到的109份培养阳性血标本中,85份(78%)通过吖啶橙和亚培养技术均检测到,14份(12.8%)仅通过亚培养检测到,10份(9.2%)仅通过吖啶橙检测到。亚培养法和吖啶橙法之间的差异无统计学意义(P小于0.1)。对于在孵育1天后未产生可见生长迹象的血培养中细菌的检测,吖啶橙法是一种快速且廉价的传统亚培养技术替代方法。